User talk:Two Tune

September 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm Seaphoto. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Common Core State Standards Initiative, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Seaphoto^Talk 04:49, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The New York Times with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. -down load 06:10, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Common Core State Standards Initiative[edit]

Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! Onel5969 (talk) 15:16, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license[edit]

Unspecified source/license for File:Common-core-the-peoples-cube.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Common-core-the-peoples-cube.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 15:45, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notice[edit]

Hello, I'm Strongjam. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Talk:Gamergate controversy because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! — Strongjam (talk) 22:38, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Gamergate General Sanctions Notice[edit]

Please read this notification carefully:
A community discussion has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the Gamergate controversy, such as Gamergate controversy, which you have recently edited.
The details of these sanctions are described here.

General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date. Strongjam (talk) 22:40, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

AHAHAHA[edit]

You sir, made my day. You'll probably be indef banned, but you will forever have a place in my heart for that edit. --DSA510 Pls No H8 22:42, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Ebolachan.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Ebolachan.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 12:05, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of topic ban[edit]

This is a formal notice of your topic ban.

The following sanction has been imposed on you:

Topic banned from Gamergate controversy-related pages for 90 days.

You have been sanctioned due to your violations of BLP at Zoe Quinn and for patently disruptive edits like the Hitler edit [1].

This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator as authorised by community's decision at WP:GS/GG, and the procedure described by the general sanctions guidelines. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions for that decision. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.

You may appeal this sanction at the administrators' noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. Acroterion (talk) 18:33, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Ebolachan.png[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Ebolachan.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Tutelary (talk) 18:58, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Boulder, Colorado, you may be blocked from editing. Magnolia677 (talk) 23:40, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing of various kinds, including in many cases outright vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 10:01, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]