User talk:Tychu9
Hi Tychu9! Yes, I am the one who usually updates the Positions by Round info.
I actually wrote a nifty little Python program that scrapes the data from the MLS website, and then figures out all of the positions.
In this case, after they had played 29 games, Portland had 37 points, New York had 36 points, and Houston had 36 points (NY had a better goal differential, which is the tiebreaker). Although Chicago hasn't yet played their 29th game, they only have 30 points, so they can't pass any of the teams. And, while DC has only played 28 games, they have 38 points, meaning that they will have passed all 3 of these teams once their position is finalized (Technically, they could still pass some more teams depending on what happens in their 29th game.).
As for the 30th round, Portland has 37 points, which puts them below DC, yet still enough above Chicago that Chicago can't catch them, even with 2 games in hand.
I know that someone was keeping each round's data (wins, losses, goals, etc.) in a spreadsheet, but I don't know if they've continued to update it. I've just been using my program.
If you see any problems with my calculations, then please let me know!
Jdfoote (talk) 05:43, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Bolding[edit]
Hi, please notice that when you start bolding or italics or something similar you must also end it. For example '''[[link]] is not okay and should be '''[[link]]'''. Please keep this in mind. Thank you. Qed237 (talk) 21:00, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
New York Cosmos[edit]
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]
Hello, Tychu9. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]
Hello, Tychu9. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
The article 2018 New York Cosmos season has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Only clubs that play in a WP:FPL can have a season-article page. NPSL is not WP:FPL.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ArsenalFan700 (talk) 20:03, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of 2018 New York Cosmos season for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2018 New York Cosmos season is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2018 New York Cosmos season until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ArsenalFan700 (talk) 03:18, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
2018 Cosmos season[edit]
Hello, Tychu9. Wikipedia needs people who propose articles for deletion. I don't see them as the police. Rather, they are simply making sure that whatever is included in the encyclopedia is notable. Whether an article is notable is based on the guidelines at WP:N. If an article addresses subject matter that is part of a WikiProject, the members of the project typically refine the general notability guidelines to define what is and isn't notable. Without the concept of notability applied, nothing would stop an editor from writing an article about the season of the youth-league team on which his or her child plays. There needs to be a line somewhere, even if the line is fuzzy. WikiProject Football's notability guidelines don't mention articles about team seasons. However, the notability guidelines for sports articles says that articles about individual seasons almost always meet the notability requirements, if they are about teams playing in top professional leagues. You may have noticed that, based on this, the article is a candidate for deletion. It is important that the point be made that the guideline is not a rule, and there are frequent departures. For example, no one disputes the notability of 2017–18 Bolton Wanderers F.C. season, even though Bolton Wanderers are not playing in a top league. Also, the USSF is treating the Cosmos in a manner similar to that of a team playing in a fully professional league: the Cosmos have been granted an entry into the 2018 U.S. Open Cup. While all teams in fully professional leagues may compete in the tournament, NPSL teams had to qualify based on their 2017 league results. The Cosmos have no 2017 NPSL results, but were given a special entry into the competition anyway. Since the USSF is not treating the Cosmos like a team paying in something other than a fully professional league, Wikipedia should not do so either. The 2018 Cosmos received national media coverage on ESPN's website, which reported the team's appeal to the USSF for an entry in the Open Cup. Once I've goten my thoughts together, I intend to express them on the article's request for deletion page. I suggest you do the same. Taxman1913 (talk) 05:39, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
- It will also be helpful if there is some narrative prose added to the article. Right now, it looks too much like a collection of statistics. I intend to add something over the next few days. Taxman1913 (talk) 05:48, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
- I just made my plea on the article's request for deletion page. We'll see how it goes. Taxman1913 (talk) 05:33, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
If you look carefully at the guideline it says top leagues, not fully professional. Bolton does not play in a top league. The nominator created the standard of fully professional leagues on his own. I agree with the principle of what they're saying about "other things exist," but that doesn't preclude the article from deserving inclusion in Wikipedia. They are correct to point out that NPSL is not officially sanctioned by USSF; it is unofficially a fourth tier league. I do think that WikiProject Football should have a serious discussion about team season articles, since the standard applicable to sports teams in general is clearly not being followed. While I respect your opinion and your right to it, I don't agree that simply because someone is willing to write an article about a semi-pro team's season that it belongs in Wikipedia. There needs to be a reason why articles are included—they should be notable, whatever that means. In general, NPSL teams should not have articles. The 2018 Cosmos are an exception in my opinion. Taxman1913 (talk) 15:01, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]
Hello, Tychu9. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]
| Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Disambiguation link notification for August 15[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020–21 New York Cosmos season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Placeholder. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:23, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 17[edit]
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Martinique national football team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Canada national soccer team.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:20, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]
| Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]
| Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |