User talk:Type89

March 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Kajal Aggarwal. When removing images, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the image has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Nutiketaiel (talk) 19:58, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Sonia Agarwal, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Nutiketaiel (talk) 20:01, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Abhirami (actress), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Nutiketaiel (talk) 20:01, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Adhyayan Suman, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Nutiketaiel (talk) 20:01, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Lucky Ali, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Nutiketaiel (talk) 20:01, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a reason you are making these removals of entire sections and images? Nutiketaiel (talk) 20:01, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Kajal Aggarwal, you will be blocked from editing. If there is a reason for these removals, please say so here, or in the edit summaries, or in the talk pages of the articles. Nutiketaiel (talk) 20:04, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is your final warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Kajal Aggarwal. Uncle Dick (talk) 20:07, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing, for a period of 72 hours, for unexplained deletion of material from articles. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. NW557Bot (talk) 01:40, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Editor has given a legitmate explanation for their actions. Type89, please make sure to include valid edit summaries when making possibly contentious changes and respond to other editors' concerns on the appropriate talk pages. Thanks, caknuck _° needs to be running more often 20:24, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Request handled by: caknuck _° needs to be running more often

Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request.

You do have a point, having looked at your edits just now. Part of the block is also for edit warring without discussion; if unblocked, would you agree to hold off editing these articles until you can discuss with other editors these removals? I do agree with the majority of your edits, however repeatedly reverting others without explanation doesn't help matters much. I'll contact the blocking administrator about this. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 20:16, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I was about to decline this request for the reason you mentioned- this user, although she is familiar with our acronyms on her first day, doesn't seem familiar with our custom of using edit summaries and discussion to explain our edits, especially when other users disagree with them. I'll leave it open for a bit, instead. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 20:24, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much, Caknuck. Type89, please keep the concepts of edit warring and consensus in mind when editing; if your edits are being reverted, make sure that editor knows why you're doing what it is you're doing (as we've said, edit summaries help with this considerably, but aren't a substitute for discussion). I have nominated File:Magadheera kajal.jpg for deletion, and removed the image from Lucky Ali, both for the reasons you brought up, and asked the editors who were reverting your edits to take a second look at them. Happy editing! Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 20:33, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Type89. You have new messages at Nutiketaiel's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

April 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page User:John has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. QueenCake (talk) 20:13, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page User:John. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Mikeo (talk) 20:14, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content from pages without explanation, as you did with this edit to User:John. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Zhang He (talk) 20:14, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits, such as this edit you made to User talk:John. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing without further notice. Zhang He (talk) 20:15, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism-only account[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Ian Cairns (talk) 20:17, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]