User talk:UCSFrb1983
Welcome[edit]
(UCSFrb1983 (talk) 23:24, 30 March 2014 (UTC))
- Hello UCSFrb1983, you might have just seen me briefly on the google hangout. I noticed your user talk page had a signature stamp on it. Thanks for testing it out. This is where people can correspond with you. The WP:Teahouse is a good place to ask questions for beginners. You also have the option of emailing me when you're logged in. Best. Biosthmors (talk) pls notify me (i.e. {{U}}) while signing a reply, thx 21:00, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure![edit]
- Hi ! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 14:57, Saturday, May 25, 2024 (UTC)
| Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
| Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Article Selection[edit]
Could you please verify which article you have selected? You can put it in the table on the main course page or put it here on your talk page, or on my talk page. Thanks Valswisher (talk) 03:33, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Welcome[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. We at WP:MED look forwards to your efforts. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 04:59, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi Fellow UCSF Wikipedian[edit]
Hey, I'm one of the students who took the course last time it was offered. Just wanted to offer any support/help I could provide. Feel free to message me on my talk page or it shouldn't be too hard to figure out my UCSF email. Emhawkins (talk) 20:12, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
A cup of coffee for you![edit]
|
Thanks for not being shy about editing the lead of the diabetes article. Many people would be. If you look at the history of the article, your edits got the response of other edits. Blue Rasberry (talk) 22:37, 13 April 2014 (UTC) |
Refs[edit]
These refs are not formatted very well [1]. Also UpToDate is not the best source for Wikipedia because there is not a static version that one can really refer to and it is difficult to access. Review articles and major textbooks are better. The cite book template works well for books. All you need is the ISBN and page number. Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 07:17, 24 April 2014 (UTC)