User talk:U rob me

Welcome!

Hello, U rob me! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 00:58, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

January 2015[edit]

Hello, I'm Barek. I noticed that you made a change to an article, PIGS (economics), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 01:50, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

April 2015[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Corruption, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Wikipedia articles cannot serve as references. See WP:CIRCULAR NeilN ^{talk to me} 21:21, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry NeilN, the Wiki article I cited includes the respective references. Therefore, I will just link them to my new article in "Corruption". Hope that is OK with you.U rob me (talk) 14:09, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Corruption, you may be blocked from editing. Your continued attempts at adding the same material and this edit summary leads me to think you are trying to use the article as a soapbox. Please stop. NeilN ^{talk to me} 21:07, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello NeilN, obviously I am not experienced enough to contribute in a way that everybody can accept my article. Sorry again, I don't want to bother you. However, perhaps you could give me a hint how to modify it. I just want to give a typical example of a national law on "Legal Corruption":

My text contains 90% citations of some official records of the Bonn Parliament from 1993-1995. There is one "Parliamentary Proposal" with its "Motivation" as well as the governmental reaction which is also cited from the official records. There is no "commentary and personal analysis" from me. Even in my introducing sentence: "Resounding efficiency in fostering corruption of private corporations against other countries was achieved in Germany after the EC southern expansion." Most parts (except of "Resounding efficiency") are translated from those Parliamentary records.

Because I believe that my contribution is important, please help me to improve it. What part shall be removed/modified? Is it my introduction or does my reference to those German Parliamentary records violate Wikipedia's rules? U rob me (talk) 22:28, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:PRIMARY - You need secondary sources to interpret what the official records mean. Your intro sounds as if the government wanted to encourage corruption. What secondary source is saying this? --NeilN ^{talk to me} 22:38, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your interpretation is correct. My intro refers to the "Motivation" (below) of the respective Parliamentary proposal. In those years the government decided to encourage (only) foreign corruption. They earned a lot of criticism from the parliament and from OECD for years. Until they stopped bribe tax deduction in 1999 and more consequent in 2002. Those laws even prevented that prosecutors could have access to files from tax offices where bribe money was declared officially. All that is discussed in the records. Shall I translate every single phrase there? Thanks for your time. U rob me (talk) 22:55, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Like I said above, you need to find a secondary source that has this interpretation. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 23:13, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]