User talk:Ubuibiok

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

No nation has ever recognized Tibet as independent.[10]

http://www.claudearpi.net/maintenance/uploaded_pics/SimlaConvention.pdf The Simla Convention: Ninety Two Years Later Colonial India: a Centenary Tribute to Prof. K.K. Datta, Edited by Prof Surendra Gopal, Veer Kunwar Singh University, Arrah, 2006, pp 140-157)

http://www.tibetjustice.org/materials/treaties/treaties16.html, Convention Between Great Britain, China, and Tibet, Simla (1914) [400] CONVENTION BETWEEN GREAT BRITAIN, CHINA, AND TIBET SIMLA 1914,Attached to the Anglo-Tibetan Declaration, of 3 July 1914


Treaties & Conventions Relating to Tibet[edit]

Sino-Tibetan Treaty, 821/823 A.D. [371]

Peace Treaty Between Ladakh and Tibet at Tingmosgang (1684) [372]

Ladakhi Letter of Agreement (1842) [374]

Agreement Between Tibet and Kashmir (1852) [375]

Treaty Between Tibet and Nepal (1856) [376]

Treaty Between Nepal and Tibet (1856) [378]

Chefoo Convention (1876) [380]

Convention Relating to Burmah and Thibet (1886) [381]

Convention Between Great Britain and China Relating to Sikkim and Tibet (1890) [382]

Convention Between Great Britain and Thibet (1904) [385]

Convention Between Great Britain and China Respecting Tibet (1906) [389]

Convention Between Great Britain and Russia (1907) [391]

Agreement Between Great Britain, China and Tibet Amending Trade Regulations of 1893 (1908) [393]

Treaty of Friendship and Alliance Between the Government of Mongolia and Tibet (1913) [397]

Anglo-Tibetan Declaration (1914) [399]

Convention Between Great Britain, China, and Tibet, Simla (1914) [400]

Anglo-Tibetan Trade Regulations (1914) [403]

Agreement for the Restoration of Peaceful Relations Between China and Tibet (1918) [406]

Supplementary Agreement Regarding Mutual Withdrawal of Troops and Cessation of Hostilities Between Chinese and Tibetans (1918) [409]


United Nations Resolutions & Reports[edit]

Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) [p.1]

Appeal by His Holiness the Dalai Lama of Tibet to the United Nations (1950) [p.5]

United Nations G.A. Resolution 1353 (XIV) on Tibet (1959) [p.7]

United Nations G.A. Resolution 1514 (XV) on Independence for Colonized Peoples (1960) [p.8]

United Nations G.A. Resolution 1723 (XVI) on Tibet (1961) [p.10]

United Nations G.A. Resolution 2079 (XX) on Tibet (1965) [p.11]

Commission on Human Rights: Sub-Commission Resolution 1991/10: Situation in Tibet [p.12]

Secretary-General's Report: Situation in Tibet, E/CN.4/1992/37 [p.13]

Report: Special Rapporteur on Torture, E/CN.4/1995/34 (excerpt) [p.61]

Report: Working Group on Enforced Disappearances, E/CN.4/1995/36 (excerpt) [p.64]

Report: Special Rapporteur on Extrajudicial Executions, E/CN.4/1995/61 (excerpt) [p.66]

Report: Special Rapporteur on Religious Intolerance, E/CN.4/1995/91 (excerpt) [p.68]

Report: Special Rapporteur on Religious Intolerance, Addendum, E/CN.4/1995/91/Add.1 (excerpt) [p.83]

Report: Committee against Torture, A/51/44 (1996) (excerpt) [p.89]

Concluding Observations of the UN Committee On Racial Discrimination 1996 (excerpt) [p.91]

Concluding Observations of the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child (1996) (excerpt) [p.94]

Report: Special Rapporteur on Extrajudicial Executions, E/CN.4/1996/4 (excerpt) [p.95]

Report: Special Rapporteur on Torture, E/CN.4/1996/35 (excerpt) [p.97]

Report: Special Rapporteur on Torture, Addendum, E/CN.4/1996/35/Add.1 (excerpt) [p.98]

Report: Working Group on Enforced Disappearances, E/CN.4/1996/38 (excerpt) [p.101]

Report: Working Group on Arbitrary Detention, E/CN.4/1996/40 (excerpt) [p.103]

Report: Special Rapporteur on Religious Intolerance, E/CN.4/1996/95 (excerpt) [p.105]

  • Numbers in brackets (e.g. [p.1]) indicate page in print version.

        • The statment that "No Nation". has ever recongnized is false Russia, Great Britain, China, Nepal, India, El Salvador








  • El Salvador

http://www.tibet.ca/en/about_tibet/current_status_of_tibet Tibet at the UN General Assembly 1950 A month after the People’s Liberation Army pierced the Eastern frontier of Central Tibet in October 1950, El Salvador responded to Tibet's plea, submitting adraft resolution to the UN entitled “Invasion of Tibet by Foreign Forces.”


Ubuibiok (talk) 00:41, 10 May 2008 (UTC)Ubuibiok (talk) 01:08, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much Ubuibiok[edit]

Thank you so much for your very generous comments on my work on the merger of history from the Tibet page to the History of Tibet page. Unfortunately, I haven't completed the merger yet - and I have not been able to check the references of everything I have moved across. I am trying to do it in a big hurry as I am leaving on a 2-month trip next Wednesday. So, any help you could give checking it and tidying it up would be much appreciated. Also, I am not an editor - so can't "lock it down". Can you do this so that every "Johnnie-come-lately" (and there are so many of these on pages relating to Tibet) doesn't vandalise it immediately? Many thanks again, and in advance for any help you may be able to give. Cheers and best wishes, John Hill (talk) 01:25, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Confusion[edit]

I didn't write the controversial comment. I justt reinserted it after someone removed it. In fact, I have actively campaigned for a free tibet Formerly 82.46.93.158 (talk) 19:17, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Board[edit]

Hi thanks for the good word but you would like me to be elected?? Please elaborate a little. Do you mean the Wikimedia Foundation? Thanks ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ $1,000,000? 09:43, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

Ubuibiok, thank you for your "thank you" regarding one of the Koch brothers articles. And thank you for pointing to the the article URL in the New Yorker which I had not read nor seen but hopefully will have the chance to integrate into one or some of the articles on the conflicts presented by the Koch brothers. Take care... Stevenmitchell (talk) 01:13, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 13 December[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:18, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]