User talk:Ujjwalkumar 47

Welcome to Wikipedia![edit]

Hello, Ujjwalkumar 47, and welcome to Wikipedia!

An edit that you recently made seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox.

Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or type {{Help me}} on your talk page here, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Green Giant supports NonFreeWiki (talk) 06:56, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021[edit]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to G.N. Saibaba. Thank you. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 09:28, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Which part was poorly referenced? GN saibaba is convicted terrorist, co conspirator and jailed convict, as per the decision of honorable court of India under UAPA Section 13, 18 and many more. The articles were also given. Ujjwalkumar 47 (talk) 12:06, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also, How come reputed Print Media Houses and UAPA Acts are poor reference when they are clearly saying he is a co conspirator of Naxal Terrorism, with questionable history of legal toruble. On the other hand "Dalit Mirror" is a rich reference which phrases anti terror ops of State of India as "Perpetration". Perpetration means "Action of crime", which simply means something against the law. How can state action be considered illegal as per state law, but he cant be called a terrorist which has been established by the same law itself? Ujjwalkumar 47 (talk) 12:14, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 18:03, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions notification[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

--RegentsPark (comment) 20:45, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]