User talk:Uma Narmada

Uma Narmada, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Uma Narmada! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like GreenMeansGo (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

AN/I notice[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Warring between Wikicircuitz and Uma Narmada. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 09:14, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please recheck the edits by me and that user.all of my good edits are reverted ..my hardwork all gone..please block that user from vandalism and disruptive edits

Please help me Persistent disruptive editing by Uma Narmada 09:06, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please recheck the good edits done by me was reverted by that user.. Persistent disruptive editing by Uma Narmada. This user is not done any good edits. Keep change the fact and content which already in that page. Right from awards, filmography, cast and crew. Please block this user now 09:17, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please check disruptive editing by Uma Narmada here - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Uma_Narmada — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikicircuitz (talk • contribs) 09:21, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this on Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. This is not my area. Best of luck. Avoid wp:3RR, BTW. Good way to get wp:blocked irregardless of other things. Cheers Adakiko (talk) 09:23, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

List of awards and nominations received by Jyothika[edit]

Wikipedia has a definition of what is and is not vandalism. Please see wp:vandalism. List of awards and nominations received by Jyothika would be considered a wp:content dispute, not vandalism. Adakiko (talk) 09:32, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not only about this page ..all of my edit contributions are reverted by that user...all of my hard work is lost by that fellow user...block that user from such kind of disturbing edits.. Uma Narmada (talk) 09:52, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not an admin, I can't block. Please indent your talk. See wp:Indentation, for more info, see help:talk pages and wp:talk page guidelines. Adakiko (talk) 10:04, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 14:54, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

-->{{unblock|Mistakes can happen to all of us.but pointing out me as culprit without giving me an oppertunity and considering my good contributions here. Directly blocking and suppressing an upcoming editor.If someone is making more edits or contribution to wikipedia is considered as doubtfull notable one here .why ??? Not giving any kind of reservation even if blocked or account from same ip .Not what you think is right...for every admin and blocking bots here. Same ip system / phone can be used by different people of same dwelling / college. When a problem arises admins. make sure that you give justice to both one or punishment to both side..some sort and kind of policies in blocking here is equvalent to a kind atrocious to normal people like us...tried to convince several times while posted and complained about other vandalisers, disruptive editors and anonymous editors. no use of making our right way of clarification here, as all just guessing and pointing for unclear to indifferentiate kind of their fake arguments.any way no hopein such kind of admin panels and blockers...about justified result here...here too politics among the various editors here..they are not allowing to grow a good editor...~~~~}} Uma Narmada (talk) 09:41, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@User Bbb23, Don't you have anything to answer me or haven't any guts🙄🤗? You next move will be to restrict talk page of mine and removing whatever the opinions i have given here.expecting some dignified manners from you.Why you guys suppresing an upcoming editor.Don't you feel ashamed about your selfish behaviour of having a supremacy and suppressing young talents ??? There will be repercussions in one way or another way which will reflect to you anytime. Personaly or Not ..sure.. Wait and See Uma Narmada (talk) 02:20, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@ Bbb23, Feeling very sorry and despise about your behaviour 🤣🤣 that u did ur way of disrespectfull and fake agreed commitments by removing contents from by another user DakshinBeta.This simply shows you are very weak and am much better than you.You dont deserve to be here and get whipped by faking supporters here..very bad about you and am so glad that you failed before me..you may remove this because of your ashamed face.anyway very nice to see you at this very cheap level too.look after some other thingsMr./Mrs./Trans, Bbb23 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 Uma Narmada (talk) 04:02, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]