User talk:Unexpectedlydian/Archives/1
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
DYK for Cleadon
On 15 January 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Cleadon, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the recreation area in Cleadon contains the remains of an 18th-century grotto? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Cleadon. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Cleadon), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Marsden Rock
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Marsden Rock you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:01, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
February with Women in Red
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:11, 31 January 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
DYK for Marsden Rock
On 4 February 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Marsden Rock, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the naturally formed arch of Marsden Rock (pictured) collapsed in 1996 following a winter of storms? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Marsden Rock. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Marsden Rock), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile (talk) 12:02, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
|
|
Hook update | |
| Your hook reached 15,714 views (1309.5 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of February 2022 – nice work! |
Bruxton (talk) 17:06, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Gateshead Millennium Bridge
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Gateshead Millennium Bridge you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:20, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
- Hi, a human here. I've completed my review of the article; there is very little that needs fixing, though a paragraph on the tourist side would seem to be needed. Looking forward to seeing your response. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:14, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Gateshead Millennium Bridge
The article Gateshead Millennium Bridge you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:Gateshead Millennium Bridge for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:21, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
March editathons
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:38, 27 February 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
DYK for Gateshead Millennium Bridge
On 21 March 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Gateshead Millennium Bridge, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Gateshead Millennium Bridge (pictured) is the world's first tilt bridge? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Gateshead Millennium Bridge. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Gateshead Millennium Bridge), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
|
|
Hook update | |
| Your hook reached 13,037 views (1,086.4 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of March 2022 – nice work! |
Bruxton (talk) 15:11, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Whitburn, Tyne and Wear
The article Whitburn, Tyne and Wear you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold 
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Whitburn, Tyne and Wear for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tim riley -- Tim riley (talk) 15:40, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
April Editathons from Women in Red
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:46, 22 March 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
GAN: Whitburn
For some reason (perhaps I have inadvertently omitted to do something techie) the usual congrats message has not appeared here. Well, it has now. The article is safely added to the GA list and marked GA on its page and the associated talk page. Bravo/brava! (delete as applicable). Tim riley talk 21:15, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
- @Tim riley Thank you for your review and for your message! Perhaps another technical thing - I can’t see the GA icon on the article. Is that something that should be added manually as well? Unexpectedlydian (talk) 22:14, 26 March 2022 (UTC)@Tim riley
- Oh, Lord! Let's wait 24 hours and see what happens. I really don't think I've omitted anything I ought to have done, and I vaguely recall something like this before with one or two of my GAN reviews, never really explained. Let's see. Meanwhile, my personal congratulations. Tim riley talk 22:19, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
- Good morning! I've followed this up here, and it seems we can add the GA badge manually if wanted or, as one editor suggests, simply leave things as they are. What think you? Tim riley talk 10:22, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for following this up, let’s add it manually :)@Tim riley Unexpectedlydian (talk) 10:41, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
- Good morning! I've followed this up here, and it seems we can add the GA badge manually if wanted or, as one editor suggests, simply leave things as they are. What think you? Tim riley talk 10:22, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
- Oh, Lord! Let's wait 24 hours and see what happens. I really don't think I've omitted anything I ought to have done, and I vaguely recall something like this before with one or two of my GAN reviews, never really explained. Let's see. Meanwhile, my personal congratulations. Tim riley talk 22:19, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
New message from DisillusionedBitterAndKnackered
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Angel of the North § Angel model at Eggleston Hall Gardens. DBaK (talk) 12:26, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Angel of the North
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Angel of the North you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of HJ Mitchell -- HJ Mitchell (talk) 20:40, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Baltic Centre for Contemporary Art
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Baltic Centre for Contemporary Art you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ladnav no esool -- Ladnav no esool (talk) 14:00, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Marsden Rock
The article Marsden Rock you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Marsden Rock for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 12:41, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you, Unexpectedlydian, for your excellent, almost single-handed coverage of Marsden Rock. I often visited the site as a child in the 1940s and 1950s. I had not realized the arch had collapsed. Thanks also for all the women's biographies you have been writing. Great work!--Ipigott (talk) 10:02, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you for your kind message! Great to know you enjoyed reading the article. It should be featuring as a DYK soon. Unexpectedlydian (talk) 11:13, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
May 2022 at Women in Red
|
--Innisfree987 (talk) 04:57, 2 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
May 2022 at Women in Red
|
--Innisfree987 (talk) 10:07, 2 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Bluey!
Thank you for your kind thankyou and I am glad I have not caused (too much) annoyance. Ermmmm … I'd better go and listen to it now, yesno? Cheers DBaK (talk) 14:36, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
- No annoyance at all! Definitely have a listen, it's a wonderful little piece. The track in Silence & Music (2017) is a personal favourite. Although, it doesn't feature the soprano solo, but a full ensemble (see conversation with @DavidBrooks above!). Unexpectedlydian (talk) 14:42, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
- Oh thanks so much – I love to have a recommendation! I have rushed off to get it, and a score. How lovely. I adore it when stuff like this happens here … my own musicianship (such as it is) can tend towards a certain narrowness, so something as gorgeous as this, to make me think, is very welcome. I also for historical reasons have a serious bit of a soft spot for Mr McC so this is grand. Cheers DBaK (talk) 23:03, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
- Perhaps I'll take a listen too. As described above, I have a personal soft spot for Rutter's crew. But, although Higginbottom is another Cambridge connection (I followed him at Corpus Christi College), I dislike his version. The acoustic is all wrong, and for me the boys' voices don't work. David Brooks (talk) 04:10, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
- Oh thanks so much – I love to have a recommendation! I have rushed off to get it, and a score. How lovely. I adore it when stuff like this happens here … my own musicianship (such as it is) can tend towards a certain narrowness, so something as gorgeous as this, to make me think, is very welcome. I also for historical reasons have a serious bit of a soft spot for Mr McC so this is grand. Cheers DBaK (talk) 23:03, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
The Blue Bird updates
Thank you so much for continuing work on The Blue Bird. I hear it so much on various radio streams these days that I was surprised to find it missing. Two comments:
- A long time ago I'm sure I heard or read someone describe it as "the most impressionistic song in the English Language" or similar words. I can't find a source, although the much later Bitner comes close; did I imagine it?
- The description of the strophic form in "Background" is a slight non-sequitur as it's not directly connected to Blue Bird at that point. Do you think you can manage that connection?
A personal anecdote. At Cambridge in either 1970 or 1971, my now-wife and I were sitting on the bank of the Cam for the Choral Society's annual performance on the river. Those days (and maybe even now), after lighting lanterns on the punts, they would start the second half with The Blue Bird. As they sang, an actual bird flew up from the grass behind them and perched on a branch, as if to listen. It was very likely that John Rutter was there (he was a post-graduate student then) and I like to think the memory carried forward to the 1986 recording. David Brooks (talk) 18:49, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
- @DavidBrooks Thank you for your kind message! I was similarly surprised to find out you only created the article back in December, it definitely feels like a piece which deserves an article of its own. Regarding your two comments, a Google search hasn't found anything which matches your quote, nor have any of the sources I've read so far (plenty about its general renown, however). I'll keep looking. And yes, I can address that point about strophic form - thanks for raising it. And thank you for sharing your anecdote, what a great story! Unexpectedlydian (talk) 19:04, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
- On your user page: [[The Blue Bird (Stanford)|''The Blue Bird'' (Stanford)]], surely? I try not to edit other peoples' user pages :-) David Brooks (talk) 21:26, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for spotting! I'll change now :) Unexpectedlydian (talk) 09:57, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
- You're very welcome. One question. Does Grove really say that CVS specified the soprano as solo? I'm sure that is a frequent practice, but it's not indicated in my copy – admittedly an American imprint, and I don't have the whole volume. When I conducted it (20 years ago!) we just split the sopranos because they outnumbered the altos anyway.David Brooks (talk) 13:59, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
- Hmmm, whilst Grove doesn't specify that it's a solo, other sources do (the 2002 Dibble biography, for example). I've also just found the entry for The Blue Bird in The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Music (5 ed.), which does say it's or sop solo. However, the Oxford Dictionary also says it's Op.119 No.4 (rather than No.3), and that it was written in 1911, so not sure what's going on there. I'm not sure how to explain that the sop part can also be sung by a full sop section other than pointing towards the recordings, as nothing I've read so far explicitly says this. Unexpectedlydian (talk) 14:33, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
- Well, my original wording said "as...the first contralto part falls within the soprano range, it can be" performed either way, because the policy for musical works is you can make claims that are self-evident from the score. But I guess that is stretching the policy. David Brooks (talk) 04:24, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
- @DavidBrooks FYI, I think the article is in a good state, so have submitted it to GAN. Hopefully getting the recognition the piece deserves! Unexpectedlydian (talk) 18:33, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
- Sounds good, and good luck. But (as I'm banned from commenting on the submission) I'd really like more attention to the authenticity of the "solo" statement. It seems extremely unlikely to me that CVS would intend a solo and then not designate the chorus as SATB. On the other hand, did he really have that many altos in mind? I wonder who wrote that in CODM, and where they got it from. I just remembered I have the non-concise 1985 ODM (Kennedy) 1989 reprint and it says the same. David Brooks (talk) 14:36, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you, I'll do some more digging and see how the article can reflect this discrepancy in the meantime! Unexpectedlydian (talk) 13:17, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
- Sounds good, and good luck. But (as I'm banned from commenting on the submission) I'd really like more attention to the authenticity of the "solo" statement. It seems extremely unlikely to me that CVS would intend a solo and then not designate the chorus as SATB. On the other hand, did he really have that many altos in mind? I wonder who wrote that in CODM, and where they got it from. I just remembered I have the non-concise 1985 ODM (Kennedy) 1989 reprint and it says the same. David Brooks (talk) 14:36, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
- @DavidBrooks FYI, I think the article is in a good state, so have submitted it to GAN. Hopefully getting the recognition the piece deserves! Unexpectedlydian (talk) 18:33, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
- Well, my original wording said "as...the first contralto part falls within the soprano range, it can be" performed either way, because the policy for musical works is you can make claims that are self-evident from the score. But I guess that is stretching the policy. David Brooks (talk) 04:24, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
- Hmmm, whilst Grove doesn't specify that it's a solo, other sources do (the 2002 Dibble biography, for example). I've also just found the entry for The Blue Bird in The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Music (5 ed.), which does say it's or sop solo. However, the Oxford Dictionary also says it's Op.119 No.4 (rather than No.3), and that it was written in 1911, so not sure what's going on there. I'm not sure how to explain that the sop part can also be sung by a full sop section other than pointing towards the recordings, as nothing I've read so far explicitly says this. Unexpectedlydian (talk) 14:33, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
- You're very welcome. One question. Does Grove really say that CVS specified the soprano as solo? I'm sure that is a frequent practice, but it's not indicated in my copy – admittedly an American imprint, and I don't have the whole volume. When I conducted it (20 years ago!) we just split the sopranos because they outnumbered the altos anyway.David Brooks (talk) 13:59, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for spotting! I'll change now :) Unexpectedlydian (talk) 09:57, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
- On your user page: [[The Blue Bird (Stanford)|''The Blue Bird'' (Stanford)]], surely? I try not to edit other peoples' user pages :-) David Brooks (talk) 21:26, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
Rejoice in the Lamb citations
I noticed your GA nomination of Rejoice in the Lamb (your page is still in my watchlist). Rather than commenting publicly, I'd just like to point out: Dibbles 1996 and Riddles 1996 have no referents. Anyway, does "Dibbles" refer to Jeremy Dibble? And Is "Riddles" the 2006 article or something else? I notice these things because I have a script that highlights missing CITEREF targets.
I sung this thing at Dulwich College mid 1960s. I can still remember the experience! David Brooks (talk) 13:52, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
- Ah thank you for spotting! I seem to have made up a new musicologist by combing the names Dibble and Riddles... I'll fix those now. I blame carelessness! Very useful script, I'll probably need it. Unexpectedlydian (talk) 15:32, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
- You're welcome. In your common.js, you can add
importScript('User:Ucucha/HarvErrors.js');which was the original, I think, but there are variants by users Svick and Trappist the monk (which has documentation at User:Trappist the monk/HarvErrors) and yours truly. Mine adds a faint note in green showing the actual format of the target CITEREF within the expansion each CS1-style template, which makes it easier to correct the error.
- You're welcome. In your common.js, you can add
- Total change of topic: mention of Britten in the context of your user name reminds me of (I'll get there, I promise) Karl Jenkins's The Armed Man: Benedictus whose opening in D major rocks between that and an E major chord (sharpened 4th, get it?) although the idea doesn't carry forward into the vocal setting. After hearing it repeatedly on Classic FM (which I no longer listen to) I listened to BB's Dream which contains exactly the same idea, same chords, somewhere in the 2nd act. It's a simple trope so I wouldn't accuse KJ of plagiarism. David Brooks (talk) 16:22, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
June events from Women in Red
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 09:22, 31 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Your GA nomination of The Blue Bird (Stanford)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Blue Bird (Stanford) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MarioSoulTruthFan -- MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 11:41, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of The Turbulent Term of Tyke Tiler
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Turbulent Term of Tyke Tiler you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Daß Wölf -- Daß Wölf (talk) 19:00, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
Thank you
Thank you for sticking with the nomination of Albert Freedman, I think your hard work has made it a much better article! Bruxton (talk) 21:47, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
- You're welcome, it was fun :) Unexpectedlydian♯4talk‽ 21:52, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red in July 2022
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:49, 27 June 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Your GA nomination of Angel of the North
The article Angel of the North you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Angel of the North for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of HJ Mitchell -- HJ Mitchell (talk) 12:21, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Rejoice in the Lamb
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Rejoice in the Lamb you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 09:20, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Scherzo in F-sharp minor (Shostakovich)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Scherzo in F-sharp minor (Shostakovich) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 07:02, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Scherzo in F-sharp minor (Shostakovich)
The article Scherzo in F-sharp minor (Shostakovich) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Scherzo in F-sharp minor (Shostakovich) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 08:42, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Baltic Centre for Contemporary Art
The article Baltic Centre for Contemporary Art you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Baltic Centre for Contemporary Art for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ganesha811 -- Ganesha811 (talk) 14:41, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
DYK for The Turbulent Term of Tyke Tiler
On 15 July 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Turbulent Term of Tyke Tiler, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that readers of The Turbulent Term of Tyke Tiler often incorrectly assume that the main character is a boy? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Turbulent Term of Tyke Tiler. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, The Turbulent Term of Tyke Tiler), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile (talk) 00:02, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red August 2022
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 11:00, 29 July 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Your GA nomination of That's Not My... (book series)
The article That's Not My... (book series) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:That's Not My... (book series) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 18:02, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red in September 2022
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:38, 31 August 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Your GA nomination of The Blue Bird (Stanford)
The article The Blue Bird (Stanford) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:The Blue Bird (Stanford) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MarioSoulTruthFan -- MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 15:41, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of The Blue Bird (Stanford)
The article The Blue Bird (Stanford) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Blue Bird (Stanford) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MarioSoulTruthFan -- MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 21:02, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
An unexpectedly Lydian funeral anthem
Jimmy Macmillan's anthem Who shall separate us?, heard at the Abbey yesterday, is ostensibly in E major but all the A's on the first stanza are unexpectedly sharpened. So of course I thought of you. David Brooks (talk) 19:13, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
- A great example of an unexpected lydian! And a great piece. I'm sure it will be featuring in the repertoires of choirs for years to come! Unexpectedlydian♯4talk‽ 21:10, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of The Gruffalo
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Gruffalo you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:00, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of The Turbulent Term of Tyke Tiler
The article The Turbulent Term of Tyke Tiler you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Turbulent Term of Tyke Tiler for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Daß Wölf -- Daß Wölf (talk) 17:21, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red October 2022
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:02, 29 September 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Your GA nomination of Rejoice in the Lamb
The article Rejoice in the Lamb you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Rejoice in the Lamb for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 20:40, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Rejoice in the Lamb
The article Rejoice in the Lamb you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Rejoice in the Lamb for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 07:41, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Scherzo in F-sharp minor (Shostakovich)
The article Scherzo in F-sharp minor (Shostakovich) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Scherzo in F-sharp minor (Shostakovich) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 07:41, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Martini Maccomo
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Martini Maccomo you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Orson12345 -- Orson12345 (talk) 22:21, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red November 2022
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 17:36, 26 October 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
DYK for Martini Maccomo
On 27 October 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Martini Maccomo, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Martini Maccomo accidentally shot someone in the eye while performing? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Martini Maccomo. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Martini Maccomo), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
WiG Editathon Barnstar
|
Women in Green Editathon — October '22 | |
| Thank you for your excellent contributions as GA reviewer for Jane Pierce at the WiG Wildcard Edition editathon! Best, Alanna the Brave (talk) 14:48, 12 November 2022 (UTC) |
Private Peaceful
The edits you made to Private Peaceful may have the wrong year on them. Great Mercian (talk) 16:41, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
- Hi @Great Mercian, thanks for your message. Can you point out which dates might be wrong? Unexpectedlydian♯4talk‽ 19:36, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
- Hi @Unexpectedlydian:.
- Pretty much anytime real life history is mentioned, for example: "Morpurgo has said that inspiration for the plot of Private Peaceful came from the story of Sergeant John Thomas Wall, who was executed for desertion on 6 September 2017." I suggest you review the text yourself as this is too complex for me. Great Mercian (talk) 21:02, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
- Ah! Thank you so much for spotting those. I am fixing them now :) Unexpectedlydian♯4talk‽ 21:36, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red in December 2022
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:57, 26 November 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Special Barnstar |
| Congratulations on being the 25th winner of Minimalist! Two excellently written articles. I'm listening to the Shostakovich scherzo now. — Bilorv (talk) 19:01, 20 December 2022 (UTC) |
- Thanks @Bilorv! What a nice surprise :) Hope you enjoy the piece! Unexpectedlydian♯4talk‽ 19:03, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of The Gruffalo
The article The Gruffalo you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Gruffalo for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:41, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
Merry Christmas!
.jpg)
.jpg)
Hello Unexpectedlydian: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, —Ganesha811 (talk) 15:36, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
,_cropped.jpg)
Happy Holidays
|
Happy Holidays | |
| Hello, I wish you the very best during the holidays. And I hope you have a very happy 2023! Bruxton (talk) 17:55, 25 December 2022 (UTC) |
Women in Red January 2023
 
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:04, 27 December 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Your GA nomination of Grey's Monument
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Grey's Monument you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Mertbiol -- Mertbiol (talk) 15:41, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
The Signpost: 1 January 2023
- Interview: ComplexRational's RfA debrief
- Technology report: Wikimedia Foundation's Abstract Wikipedia project "at substantial risk of failure"
- Essay: Mobile editing
- Arbitration report: Arbitration Committee Election 2022
- Recent research: Graham's Hierarchy of Disagreement in talk page disputes
- Featured content: Would you like to swing on a star?
- Traffic report: Football, football, football! Wikipedia Football Club!
- CommonsComix: #4: The Course of WikiEmpire
- From the archives: Five, ten, and fifteen years ago
Welcome to the 2023 WikiCup!
Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2023 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor you should be able to advance to at least the second round, improving your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page ready for you to take part. Any questions on the scoring, rules or anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email). Good luck! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:17, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Martini Maccomo
The article Martini Maccomo you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Martini Maccomo for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Orson12345 -- Orson12345 (talk) 21:01, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 9
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Harry Farr, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Portrait Gallery.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Harry Farr
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Harry Farr you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pickersgill-Cunliffe -- Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 22:23, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Bethlehem Down
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Bethlehem Down you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of LunaEatsTuna -- LunaEatsTuna (talk) 23:40, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Bethlehem Down
The article Bethlehem Down you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Bethlehem Down and Talk:Bethlehem Down/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of LunaEatsTuna -- LunaEatsTuna (talk) 00:21, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Bethlehem Down
The article Bethlehem Down you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Bethlehem Down for comments about the article, and Talk:Bethlehem Down/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of LunaEatsTuna -- LunaEatsTuna (talk) 17:21, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 16 January 2023
- Special report: Coverage of 2022 bans reveals editors serving long sentences in Saudi Arabia since 2020
- News and notes: Revised Code of Conduct Enforcement Guidelines up for vote, WMF counsel departs, generative models under discussion
- In the media: Court orders user data in libel case, Saudi Wikipedia in the crosshairs, Larry Sanger at it again
- Technology report: View it! A new tool for image discovery
- In focus: Busting into Grand Central
- Serendipity: How I bought part of Wikipedia – for less than $100
- Featured content: Flip your lid
- Traffic report: The most viewed articles of 2022
- From the archives: Five, ten, and fifteen years ago
Your GA nomination of Private Peaceful
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Private Peaceful you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 18:41, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Barnstar
|
The Invisible Barnstar | |
| For reviewing 5 nominations for a total of 6 points during the June 2022 GAN Backlog Drive, I hereby award you this barnstar. Congratulations! Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 15:55, 19 January 2023 (UTC) |
DYK for Grey's Monument
On 22 January 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Grey's Monument, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in 1941 a bolt of lightning knocked off the head of Grey's Monument (pictured)? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Grey's Monument. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Grey's Monument), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Thomas Highgate
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Thomas Highgate you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 02:43, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Thomas Highgate
The article Thomas Highgate you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Thomas Highgate and Talk:Thomas Highgate/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 03:01, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red in February 2023
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:30, 30 January 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Your GA nomination of The Lamb (Tavener)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Lamb (Tavener) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Your Power -- Your Power (talk) 09:01, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 4 February 2023
- From the editor: New for the Signpost: Author pages, tag pages, and a decent article search function
- News and notes: Foundation update on fundraising, new page patrol, Tides, and Wikipedia blocked in Pakistan
- Disinformation report: Wikipedia on Santos
- Op-Ed: Estonian businessman and political donor brings lawsuit against head of national Wikimedia chapter
- Recent research: Wikipedia's "moderate yet systematic" liberal citation bias
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Organized Labour
- Tips and tricks: XTools: Data analytics for your list of created articles
- Featured content: 20,000 Featureds under the Sea
- Traffic report: Films, deaths and ChatGPT
Your GA nomination of John S. Clarke
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article John S. Clarke you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Krisgabwoosh -- Krisgabwoosh (talk) 09:21, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Women of Britain Say 'Go!'
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Women of Britain Say 'Go!' you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of LunaEatsTuna -- LunaEatsTuna (talk) 00:42, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 20 February 2023
- In the media: Arbitrators open case after article alleges Wikipedia "intentionally distorts" Holocaust coverage
- Disinformation report: The "largest con in corporate history"?
- Tips and tricks: All about writing at DYK
- Featured content: Eden, lost.
- Gallery: Love is in the air
- From the archives: 5, 10, and 15 years ago: Let's (not) delete the Main Page!
- Humour: The RfA Candidate's Song
A Barnstar for you!!!
|
The Teamwork Barnstar | |
| For your participation and help at Wikipedia:Good Article proposal drive 2023. It wouldn't have been such a success without you. 🏵️Etrius ( Us) 20:53, 21 February 2023 (UTC) |
Women in Red March 2023
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 12:55, 26 February 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
WikiCup 2023 March newsletter
So ends the first round of the 2023 WikiCup. Everyone with a positive score moved on to Round 2, with 54 contestants qualifying. The top scorers in Round 1 were:
Unlimitedlead with 1205 points, a WikiCup newcomer, led the field with two featured articles on historical figures and several featured article candidate reviews.
Epicgenius was in second place with 789 points; a seasoned WikiCup competitor he specialises in buildings and locations in New York.
FrB.TG was in third place with 625 points, garnered from a featured article on a filmmaker which qualified for an impressive number of bonus points.
TheJoebro64, another WikiCup newcomer, came next with 600 points gained from two featured articles on video games.
Iazyges was in fifth place with 532 points, from two featured articles on classical history.
The top sixteen contestants at the end of Round 1 had all scored over 300 points; these included 
LunaEatsTuna, 
Thebiguglyalien, 
Sammi Brie, 
Trainsandotherthings, 
Lee Vilenski, 
Juxlos, 
Unexpectedlydian, 
SounderBruce, 
Kosack, 
BennyOnTheLoose and 
PCN02WPS. It was a high-scoring start to the competition.
These contestants, like all the others, now have to start again from scratch. The first round finished on February 26. Remember that any content promoted after that date but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Some contestants made claims before the new submissions pages were set up, and they will need to resubmit them. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed.
If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:37, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 9 March 2023
- News and notes: What's going on with the Wikimedia Endowment?
- Technology report: Second flight of the Soviet space bears: Testing ChatGPT's accuracy
- In the media: What should Wikipedia do? Publish Russian propaganda? Be less woke? Cover the Holocaust in Poland differently?
- Featured content: In which over two-thirds of the featured articles section needs to be copied over to WikiProject Military History's newsletter
- Recent research: "Wikipedia's Intentional Distortion of the Holocaust" in Poland and "self-focus bias" in coverage of global events
- From the archives: Five, ten, and fifteen years ago
DYK for Women of Britain Say 'Go!'
On 13 March 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Women of Britain Say 'Go!', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the propaganda poster "Women of Britain Say 'Go!'" (pictured) was part of an attempt to ignore pre-war advances by women and reinforce gender stereotypes? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Women of Britain Say 'Go!'. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Women of Britain Say 'Go!'), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
BorgQueen (talk) 00:02, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
|
|
Hook update | |
| Your hook reached 14,058 views (1,171.5 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of March 2023 – nice work! |
GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:27, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
DYK for Private Peaceful
On 18 March 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Private Peaceful, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the name of the book Private Peaceful came from a misspelled gravestone? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Private Peaceful. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Private Peaceful), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
BorgQueen (talk) 12:03, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 20 March 2023
- News and notes: Wikimania submissions deadline looms, Russian government after our lucky charms, AI woes nix CNET from RS slate
- Eyewitness: Three more stories from Ukrainian Wikimedians
- In the media: Paid editing, plagiarism payouts, proponents of a ploy, and people peeved at perceived preferences
- Featured content: Way too many featured articles
- Interview: 228/2/1: the inside scoop on Aoidh's RfA
- Traffic report: Who died? Who won? Who lost?
Your GA nomination of Daddy, what did you do in the Great War?
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Daddy, what did you do in the Great War? you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of BennyOnTheLoose -- BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 00:02, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Daddy, what did you do in the Great War?
The article Daddy, what did you do in the Great War? you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Daddy, what did you do in the Great War? and Talk:Daddy, what did you do in the Great War?/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of BennyOnTheLoose -- BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 13:03, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
DYK for Thomas Highgate
On 24 March 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Thomas Highgate, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Thomas Highgate was the first British soldier on the Western Front to be executed for desertion during the First World War? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Thomas Highgate. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Thomas Highgate), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
BorgQueen (talk) 00:03, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red April 2023
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:54, 27 March 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Your GA nomination of Grey's Monument
The article Grey's Monument you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Grey's Monument for comments about the article, and Talk:Grey's Monument/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Mertbiol -- Mertbiol (talk) 18:22, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 03 April 2023
- From the editor: Some long-overdue retractions
- News and notes: Sounding out, a universal code of conduct, and dealing with AI
- Arbitration report: "World War II and the history of Jews in Poland" case is ongoing
- Featured content: Hail, poetry! Thou heav'n-born maid
- Recent research: Language bias: Wikipedia captures at least the "silhouette of the elephant", unlike ChatGPT
- From the archives: April Fools' through the ages
- Disinformation report: Sus socks support suits, seems systemic
Your GA nomination of Harry Farr
The article Harry Farr you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Harry Farr for comments about the article, and Talk:Harry Farr/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pickersgill-Cunliffe -- Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 17:42, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
DYK for Daddy, what did you do in the Great War?
On 17 April 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Daddy, what did you do in the Great War?, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that some British soldiers hung the First World War propaganda poster "Daddy, what did you do in the Great War?" in the trenches and left sarcastic answers to the daughter's question? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Daddy, what did you do in the Great War?. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Daddy, what did you do in the Great War?), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Aoidh (talk) 00:02, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
|
|
Hook update | |
| Your hook reached 56,008 views (2,333.6 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of April 2023 – nice work! |
GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:27, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Private Peaceful
The article Private Peaceful you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Private Peaceful for comments about the article, and Talk:Private Peaceful/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:41, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 26 April 2023
- News and notes: Staff departures at Wikimedia Foundation, Jimbo hands in the bits, and graphs' zeppelin burns
- In the media: Contested truth claims in Wikipedia
- Obituary: Remembering David "DGG" Goodman
- Arbitration report: Holocaust in Poland, Jimbo in the hot seat, and a desysopping
- Special report: Signpost statistics between years 2005 and 2022
- News from the WMF: Collective planning with the Wikimedia Foundation
- Featured content: In which we described the featured articles in rhyme again
- From the archives: April Fools' through the ages, part two
- Humour: The law of hats
- Traffic report: Long live machine, the future supreme
Women in Red May 2023
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:30, 27 April 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Your GA nomination of Thomas Highgate
The article Thomas Highgate you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Thomas Highgate for comments about the article, and Talk:Thomas Highgate/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 21:22, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
WikiCup 2023 May newsletter
The second round of the 2023 WikiCup has now finished. Contestants needed to have scored 60 points to advance into round 3. Our top five scorers in round 2 all included a featured article among their submissions and each scored over 500 points. They were:
- Iazyges (1040) with three FAs on Byzantine emperors, and lots of bonus points.
- Unlimitedlead (847), with three FAs on ancient history, one GA and nine reviews.
- Epicgenius (636), a WikiCup veteran, with one FA on the New Amsterdam Theatre, four GAs and eleven DYKs
BennyOnTheLoose (553), a seasoned competitor, with one FA on snooker, six GAs and seven reviews.- FrB.TG (525), with one FA, a Lady Gaga song and a mass of bonus points.
Other notable performances were put in by Sammi Brie, Thebiguglyalien, 
MyCatIsAChonk, PCN02WPS, and 
AirshipJungleman29.
So far contestants have achieved thirteen featured articles between them, one being a joint effort, and forty-nine good articles. The judges are pleased with the thorough reviews that are being performed, and have hardly had to reject any. As we enter the third round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed in round 3. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them.
If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:15, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of The Lamb (Tavener)
The article The Lamb (Tavener) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:The Lamb (Tavener) and Talk:The Lamb (Tavener)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Your Power -- Your Power (talk) 08:22, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of The Lamb (Tavener)
The article The Lamb (Tavener) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Lamb (Tavener) for comments about the article, and Talk:The Lamb (Tavener)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Your Power -- Your Power (talk) 19:22, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 8 May 2023
- News and notes: New legal "deVLOPments" in the EU
- In the media: Vivek's smelly socks, online safety, and politics
- Recent research: Gender, race and notability in deletion discussions
- Featured content: I wrote a poem for each article, I found rhymes for all the lists; My first featured picture of this year now finally exists!
- Arbitration report: "World War II and the history of Jews in Poland" approaches conclusion
- News from the WMF: Planning together with the Wikimedia Foundation
Your GA nomination of John S. Clarke
The article John S. Clarke you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:John S. Clarke for comments about the article, and Talk:John S. Clarke/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Krisgabwoosh -- Krisgabwoosh (talk) 23:41, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Women of Britain Say 'Go!'
The article Women of Britain Say 'Go!' you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Women of Britain Say 'Go!' and Talk:Women of Britain Say 'Go!'/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of LunaEatsTuna -- LunaEatsTuna (talk) 22:21, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Women of Britain Say 'Go!'
The article Women of Britain Say 'Go!' you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Women of Britain Say 'Go!' for comments about the article, and Talk:Women of Britain Say 'Go!'/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of LunaEatsTuna -- LunaEatsTuna (talk) 23:01, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 22 May 2023
- In the media: History, propaganda and censorship
- Arbitration report: Final decision in "World War II and the history of Jews in Poland"
- Featured content: A very musical week for featured articles
- Traffic report: Coronation, chatbot, celebs
Women in Red - June 2023
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 09:17, 28 May 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
The Signpost: 5 June 2023
- News and notes: WMRU director forks new 'pedia, birds flap in top '22 piccy, WMF weighs in on Indian gov's map axe plea
- Featured content: Poetry under pressure
- Traffic report: Celebs, controversies and a chatbot in the public eye
The Signpost: 19 June 2023
- News and notes: WMF Terms of Use now in force, new Creative Commons licensing
- Featured content: Content, featured
- Recent research: Hoaxers prefer currently-popular topics
Your GA nomination of Daddy, what did you do in the Great War?
The article Daddy, what did you do in the Great War? you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Daddy, what did you do in the Great War? for comments about the article, and Talk:Daddy, what did you do in the Great War?/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of BennyOnTheLoose -- BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 00:01, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red July 2023
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:44, 27 June 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
The Signpost: 3 July 2023
- Disinformation report: Imploded submersible outfit foiled trying to sing own praises on Wikipedia
- Featured content: Incensed
- Traffic report: Are you afraid of spiders? Arnold? The Idol? ChatGPT?
WikiCup 2023 July newsletter
The third round of the 2023 WikiCup has come to an end. The 16 users who made it to the fourth round had at least 175 points. Our top scorers in round 3 were:
Thebiguglyalien, with 919 points from a featured article on Frances Cleveland as well as five good articles and many reviews,- Unlimitedlead, with 862 points from a high-scoring featured articles on Henry II of England and numerous reviews,
- Iazyges, with 560 points from a high-scoring featured article on Tiberius III.
Contestants achieved 11 featured articles, 2 featured lists, 47 good articles, 72 featured or good article reviews, over 100 DYKs and 40 ITN appearances. As always, any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met. Please also remember that all submissions must meet core Wikipedia policies, regardless of the review process.
If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:18, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 17 July 2023
- In the media: Tentacles of Emirates plot attempt to ensnare Wikipedia
- Tips and tricks: What automation can do for you (and your WikiProject)
- Featured content: Scrollin', scrollin', scrollin', keep those readers scrollin', got to keep on scrollin', Rawhide!
- Traffic report: The Idol becomes the Master
Women in Red 8th Anniversary
|
|
Women in Red 8th Anniversary |
| In July 2015 around 15.5% of the English Wikipedia's biographies were about women. As of July 2023, 19.61% of the English Wikipedia's biographies are about women. That's a lot of biographies created in the effort to close the gender gap. Happy 8th Anniversary! Join us for some virtual cake and add comments or memories and please keep on editing to close the gap! |
--Lajmmoore (talk) 11:02, 18 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red August 2023
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 19:26, 28 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive
| Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive |  |
August 2023 Backlog Drive:
| |
| Other ways to participate: | |
| You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. | |
The Signpost: 1 August 2023
- News and notes: City officials attempt to doxx Wikipedians, Ruwiki founder banned, WMF launches Mastodon server
- In the media: Truth, AI, bull from politicians, and climate change
- Disinformation report: Hot climate, hot hit, hot money, hot news hot off the presses!
- Tips and tricks: Citation tools for dummies!
- In focus: Journals cited by Wikipedia
- Opinion: Are global bans the last step?
- Featured content: Featured Content, 1 to 15 July
- Traffic report: Come on Oppie, let's go party
The Signpost: 15 August 2023
- News and notes: Dude, Where's My Donations? Wikimedia Foundation announces another million in grants for non-Wikimedia-related projects
- Tips and tricks: How to find images for your articles, check their copyright, upload them, and restore them
- Cobwebs: Getting serious about writing
- Serendipity: Why I stopped taking photographs almost altogether
- Featured content: Barbenheimer confirmed
- Traffic report: 'Cause today it just goes with the fashion
September 2023 at Women in Red
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Victuallers (talk) 16:59, 25 August 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
The Signpost: 31 August 2023
- From the editor: Beta version of signpost.news now online
- News and notes: You like RecentChanges?
- In the media: Taking it sleazy
- Recent research: The five barriers that impede "stitching" collaboration between Commons and Wikipedia
- Draftspace: Bad Jokes and Other Draftspace Novelties
- Humour: The Dehumourification Plan
- Traffic report: Raise your drinking glass, here's to yesterday
WikiCup 2023 September newsletter
The fourth round of the competition has finished, with anyone scoring less than 673 points being eliminated. It was a high scoring round with all but one of the contestants who progressed to the final having achieved an FA during the round. The highest scorers were
- Epicgenius, with 2173 points topping the scores, gained mainly from a featured article, 38 good articles and 9 DYKs. He was followed by
Sammi Brie, with 1575 points, gained mainly from a featured article, 28 good articles and 50 good article reviews. Close behind was- Thebiguglyalien, with 1535 points mainly gained from a featured article, 15 good articles, 26 good article reviews and lots of bonus points.
Between them during round 4, contestants achieved 12 featured articles, 3 featured lists, 3 featured pictures, 126 good articles, 46 DYK entries, 14 ITN entries, 67 featured article candidate reviews and 147 good article reviews. Congratulations to our eight finalists and all who participated! It was a generally high-scoring and productive round and I think we can expect a highly competitive finish to the competition.
Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them and within 24 hours of the end of the final. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send.
I will be standing down as a judge after the end of the contest. I think the Cup encourages productive editors to improve their contributions to Wikipedia and I hope that someone else will step up to take over the running of the Cup. Sturmvogel 66 (talk), and Cwmhiraeth (talk)
The Signpost: 16 September 2023
- In the media: "Just flirting", going Dutch and Shapps for the defence?
- Obituary: Nosebagbear
- Featured content: Catching up
- Traffic report: Some of it's magic, some of it's tragic
Women in Red October 2023
See also
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:54, 29 September 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
The Signpost: 3 October 2023
- News and notes: Wikimedia Endowment financial statement published
- Recent research: Readers prefer ChatGPT over Wikipedia; concerns about limiting "anyone can edit" principle "may be overstated"
- Featured content: By your logic,
- Poetry: "The Sight"
The Signpost: 23 October 2023
- News and notes: Where have all the administrators gone?
- In the media: Thirst traps, the fastest loading sites on the web, and the original collaborative writing
- Gallery: Before and After: Why you don't need to know how to restore images to make massive improvements
- Featured content: Yo, ho! Blow the man down!
- Traffic report: The calm and the storm
- News from Diff: Sawtpedia: Giving a Voice to Wikipedia Using QR Codes
Women in Red - November 2023
See also Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 08:23, 26 October 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
WikiCup 2023 November newsletter
The WikiCup is a marathon rather than a sprint and all those reaching the final round have been involved in the competition for the last ten months, improving Wikipedia vastly during the process. After all this hard work, 
BeanieFan11 has emerged as the 2023 winner and the WikiCup Champion. The finalists this year were:-
BeanieFan11 with 2582 points- Thebiguglyalien with 1615 points
- Epicgenius with 1518 points
MyCatIsAChonk with 1012 points- BennyOnTheLoose with 974 points
AirshipJungleman29 with 673 points- Sammi Brie with 520 points
- Unlimitedlead with 5 points
Congratulations to everyone who participated in this year's WikiCup, whether they made it to the final round or not, and particular congratulations to the newcomers to the competition, some of whom did very well. Wikipedia has benefitted greatly from the quality creations, expansions and improvements made, and the numerous reviews performed. All those who reached the final round will win awards. The following special awards will be made based on high performance in particular areas of content creation and review. Awards will be handed out in the next few days.
- Unlimitedlead wins the featured article prize, for 7 FAs in total including 3 in round 2.
- MyCatIsAChonk wins the featured list prize, for 5 FLs in total.
Lee Vilenski wins the featured topic prize, for a 6-article featured topic in round 4.- MyCatIsAChonk wins the featured picture prize, for 6 FPs in total.
- BeanieFan11 wins the good article prize, for 75 GAs in total, including 61 in the final round.
- Epicgenius wins the good topic prize, for a 41-article good topic in the final round.
LunaEatsTuna wins the GA reviewer prize, for 70 GA reviews in round 1.- MyCatIsAChonk wins the FA reviewer prize, for 66 FA reviews in the final round.
- Epicgenius wins the DYK prize, for 49 did you know articles in total.
Muboshgu wins the ITN prize, for 46 in the news articles in total.
The WikiCup has run every year since 2007. With the 2023 contest now concluded, I will be standing down as a judge due to real life commitments, so I hope that another editor will take over running the competition. Please get in touch if you are interested. Next year's competition will hopefully begin on 1 January 2024. You are invited to sign up to participate in the contest; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors. It only remains to congratulate our worthy winners once again and thank all participants for their involvement! (If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send.) Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:52, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 6 November 2023
- Arbitration report: Admin bewilderingly unmasks self as sockpuppet of other admin who was extremely banned in 2015
- In the media: UK shadow chancellor accused of ripping off WP articles for book, Wikipedians accused of being dicks by a rich man
- Opinion: An open letter to Elon Musk
- WikiCup report: The WikiCup 2023
- News from Wiki Ed: Equity lists on Wikipedia
- Recent research: How English Wikipedia drove out fringe editors over two decades
- Featured content: Like putting a golf course in a historic site.
- Traffic report: Cricket jumpscare
The Signpost: 20 November 2023
- In the media: Propaganda and photos, lunatics and a lunar backup
- News and notes: Update on Wikimedia's financial health
- Traffic report: If it bleeds, it leads
- Recent research: Canceling disputes as the real function of ArbCom
- Wikimania: Wikimania 2024 scholarships
Women in Red December 2023
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:25, 27 November 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 4 December 2023
- In the media: Turmoil on Hebrew Wikipedia, grave dancing, Olga's impact and inspiring Bhutanese nuns
- Disinformation report: "Wikipedia and the assault on history"
- Comix: Bold comics for a new age
- Essay: I am going to die
- Featured content: Real gangsters move in silence
- Traffic report: And it's hard to watch some cricket, in the cold November Rain
- Humour: Mandy Rice-Davies Applies
The Signpost: 24 December 2023
- Special report: Did the Chinese Communist Party send astroturfers to sabotage a hacktivist's Wikipedia article?
- News and notes: The Italian Public Domain wars continue, Wikimedia RU set to dissolve, and a recap of WLM 2023
- In the media: Consider the humble fork
- Discussion report: Arabic Wikipedia blackout; Wikimedians discuss SpongeBob, copyrights, and AI
- In focus: Liquidation of Wikimedia RU
- Technology report: Dark mode is coming
- Recent research: "LLMs Know More, Hallucinate Less" with Wikidata
- Gallery: A feast of holidays and carols
- Comix: Lollus lmaois 200C tincture
- Crossword: when the crossword is sus
- Traffic report: What's the big deal? I'm an animal!
- From the editor: A piccy iz worth OVAR 9000!!!11oneone! wordz ^_^
- Humour: Guess the joke contest
Women in Red January 2024
Announcement
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:19, 28 December 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Mars Society GA, again!
Hey, I saw you active on Wikipedia again. Would you like to review Mars Society GAN? CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 03:02, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Hello! Thanks for getting in touch :) I may have time to review this after Christmas, unless someone gets there before me! Unexpectedlydian♯4talk‽ 14:48, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you so so much! Hopefully the article is now much better than before. CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 16:11, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Hey @CactiStaccingCrane, looks like Mars Society isn't currently a GA nominee. I've just read your comment on the FAC page – I'm sorry you've had bad experiences with the GAN process. I appreciate it can take ages for articles to get picked up, and the thoroughness of reviews can vary. I would recommend putting it up for GAN though. I agree with you that it looks better than when I last reviewed it :) Happy new year! Unexpectedlydian♯4talk‽ 20:32, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you so so much! Hopefully the article is now much better than before. CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 16:11, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Welcome to the 2024 WikiCup!
Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2024 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor you should be able to advance to at least the second round, improving your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page ready for you to take part. Any questions on the scoring, rules or anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close on 31 January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email), Epicgenius (talk · contribs · email), and Frostly (talk · contribs · email). Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
The Signpost: 10 January 2024
- From the editor: NINETEEN MORE YEARS! NINETEEN MORE YEARS!
- Special report: Public Domain Day 2024
- Technology report: Wikipedia: A Multigenerational Pursuit
- News and notes: In other news ... see ya in court!
- WikiProject report: WikiProjects Israel and Palestine
- Obituary: Anthony Bradbury
- Traffic report: The most viewed articles of 2023
- Comix: Conflict resolution
John Smith Clarke 1885 - 1959
Hi Thank you for contacting me. I've researched our family tree for 10 yrs on Ancestry and it's only recently I've been puzzled as to why everywhere I read it suggests John came from a circus family. My close and distant dna cousins on Ancestry also have the same records and history as myself for John Smith Clarke. I'm just reading his book Circus Parade atm and am ordering his two other autobiographies. His father was a cloth salesman and a 'Window ticker writer' 1901 Census, later in his life. Maybe he was a ticket writer for the Circus, but that would also be an assumption and that also doesn't suggest his son was born into a circus family. I've nothing against circus people and would be just as accepting if those were the facts but I can't find anything on our family records that suggest this. Thank you Jane — Preceding unsigned comment added by ChewMagna (talk • contribs) 10:52, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @ChewMagna, thank you for taking an interest in editing Wikipedia! The Oxford Dictionary of National Biography has this to say of Clarke's family connection with the circus: "Clarke was proud that his family had been pioneers of the circus, performing in the open air before there was a giant top." This may be where the fact has come from, echoed in the Class Movement Library's article on Clarke: "He was born into a circus family in Jarrow in 1885...". If you come across any information in reliable sources, please feel free to add it to the article with an appropriate citation. Hope this helps! Unexpectedlydian♯4talk‽ 16:15, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red February 2024
Announcement
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:11, 28 January 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
The Signpost: 31 January 2024
- News and notes: Wikipedian Osama Khalid celebrated his 30th birthday in jail
- Opinion: Until it happens to you
- Disinformation report: How paid editors squeeze you dry
- Recent research: Croatian takeover was enabled by "lack of bureaucratic openness and rules constraining [admins]"
- Traffic report: DJ, gonna burn this goddamn house right down
WikiCup 2024 February newsletter
The 2024 WikiCup is off to a flying start, with 135 participants. This is the largest number of participants we have seen since 2017.
Our current leader is newcomer 
Generalissima (submissions), who has one FA on John Littlejohn (preacher) and 10 GAs and 12 DYKs mostly on New Zealand coinage and Inuit figures. Here are some more noteworthy scorers:
AirshipJungleman29 (submissions), with one FA on Hö'elün, two GAs on Mongolia-related articles, and two DYKs;
Vami_IV (submissions), with one FA on Doom (2016 video game), one GA on Boundary Fire (2017), and 11 reviews;
MaranoFan (submissions), with one FA on Holidays (Meghan Trainor song), a nine-article FT on 30 (album), and two DYKs;
Skyshifter (submissions), with one FA on OneShot and one DYK;- Sammi Brie (submissions), with five GAs and five DYKs on television and radio stations;
voorts (submissions) and 
Elli (submissions), both with one FA and one DYK each.
As a reminder, competitors may submit work for the first round until 23:59 (UTC) on 27 February, and the second round starts 1 March. Remember that only the top 64 scoring competitors will make it through to the second round; currently, competitors need at least 15 points to progress. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAN, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:58, 11 February 2024 (UTC)