User talk:Usien6

Welcome!

Hello, Usien6, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! --Nlu (talk) 17:55, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: CS. banning[edit]

You're welcome. Happy editing! --Silver Edge (talk) 04:19, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Chatr (HP-UX command) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chatr (HP-UX command) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chatr (HP-UX command) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Liam987 (talk) 21:58, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

hey[edit]

in muammar gaddafi, are you testing me to see if I break the 3rr? Outedexits (talk) 16:26, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Caro @Outedexits: Não vou cair na sua provocação barata [1][2][3], apenas vou aguardar o seu banimento por fantochismo com Tetra quark. Att., --Usien6 ^{msg • his} 16:39, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Por que raios tu resolveu sair da wikipédia em português pra vir pra cá? Tu entende que cada wikipédia é um projeto diferente? Outedexits (talk) 17:17, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Outedexits: Desde a metade desse ano o login é 100% global. Agora me diga, por que você diz ser brasileiro mas escreve como tuga? --Usien6 ^{msg • his} 17:25, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

O que é "tuga"? Outedexits (talk) 18:01, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Uh, "tuga" é um outro editor da Wikipédia? Agora fiquei curioso, por que a pergunta?? --Usien6 ^{msg • his} 18:12, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Eu perguntei por que não faço idéia do que tuga signifique. Outedexits (talk) 18:15, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

E por sinal, meu inglês é ótimo. Não tem nada de errado nele. Outedexits (talk) 18:03, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Outedexits: For a moment I wondered if you use to write so bad deliberately, as an puppetry strategy. But, now I see how fool I was. Please reefer me this teacher who managed to teach you the whole English grammar sooo fast. Is it a he or a she? --Usien6 ^{msg • his} 18:55, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pequenas correções. Primeiro, "used to" é mais adequado. Segundo, é "a puppetry", não "an puppetry". Outedexits (talk) 19:50, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Outedexits: 64½ million can't be wrong. Cheers --Usien6 ^{msg • his} 20:09, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Miro Weinberger[edit]

You added a See Also about the list of Socialist mayors of the United States to the Miro Weinberger article. Why did you do this? Weinberger wasn't elected as a socialist. Thanks, Dismas|^(talk) 22:06, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done^[4] @Dismas: My bad !!

--Usien6 ^{msg • his} 22:17, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted Page[edit]

See also: User talk:Houseofcrowns § Speedy deletion nomination of Draft talk:Nomni (rev. 816561867)

You just recently deleted a draft I was working on! I am not really sure why as the details you gave are vague on the true reason why my draft was deleted. I responded back but no reply. I am new to but I am well groomed in article writing. There was no clear proof of spamming as this is the reason it' say my page was deleted. I can even see the original work I did any more. All my content is gone.I need clear and concise example on how the article called draft:nomni is spam. Nothing about this was pointed on why the draft is not acceptable. And why are people allowed to delete material that your working on shouldn't this be private work of the individual till it's time to go public. The article must be submitted for review. So please can you assist me in this matter. At least with the intellectual property of the article that I wrote I would at least like to obtain my content thank you.Houseofcrowns (talk) 04:17, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dear @Houseofcrowns: The following pages:

…where deleted in accordance to the following policies and guidelines:

It is also worth mentioning that all these four pages had the very same content, for no good reason, other than spamming. Note that there is not such a thing as "private work" in Wikipedia. Furthermore, when you uploaded your draft to our servers, you have agreed to license it in the terms of Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0. Finally, you should definitively check WP:YFA and WP:HOW out. Kind regards, --User:Usien6 11:28, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

RE: The following terms need to be understood.

"Distribute" means to make available to the public the original and copies of the Work or Adaptation, as appropriate, through sale or other transfer of ownership.
"License Elements" means the following high-level license attributes as selected by Licensor and indicated in the title of this License: Attribution, ShareAlike.
"Licensor" means the individual, individuals, entity or entities that offer(s) the Work under the terms of this License.
"Original Author" means, in the case of a literary or artistic work, the individual, individuals, entity or entities who created the Work or if no individual or entity can be identified, the publisher; and in addition (i) in the case of a performance the actors, singers, musicians, dancers, and other persons who act, sing, deliver, declaim, play in, interpret or otherwise perform literary or artistic works or expressions of folklore; (ii) in the case of a phonogram the producer being the person or legal entity who first fixes the sounds of a performance or other sounds; and, (iii) in the case of broadcasts, the organization that transmits the broadcast.
"Work" means the literary and/or artistic work offered under the terms of this License including without limitation any production in the literary, scientific and artistic domain, whatever may be the mode or form of its expression including digital form, such as a book, pamphlet and other writing; a lecture, address, sermon or other work of the same nature; a dramatic or dramatico-musical work; a choreographic work or entertainment in dumb show; a musical composition with or without words; a cinematographic work to which are assimilated works expressed by a process analogous to cinematography; a work of drawing, painting, architecture, sculpture, engraving or lithography; a photographic work to which are assimilated works expressed by a process analogous to photography; a work of applied art; an illustration, map, plan, sketch or three-dimensional work relative to geography, topography, architecture or science; a performance; a broadcast; a phonogram; a compilation of data to the extent it is protected as a copyrightable work; or a work performed by a variety or circus performer to the extent it is not otherwise considered a literary or artistic work.

You mention no good reason and these seem to be assumptions base off your personal opinion alone here. There is no evidences the other pre-templates drafts for other connected informative pages that were to be drafted after the first page and connected were actually spam. Which you made no distinction which parts are spammy, etc. There was no inquiry into the matter. Which I've also read the deletion process which mention how I am able to retrieve "MY CONTENT". This is not going accordingly to the rules so please can you please restore my content. So I can finish drafting the informative works on behalf of my community. Who needs there own page accordingly; as I also have read the article for the relevant need of a article. I also read where you were are to be submitted for review. I read all the articles you post and nothing in them clearly explain your reasoning; which is why this response is sent to you. Because even the deletion process mention how I am able to retrieve "MY CONTENT". Thank you. -- Houseofcrowns (talk) 13:17, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Houseofcrowns: Yeah, dude, whatever… Merry Christmas, --Usien6 14:50, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lsattr (AIX command)[edit]

The article Lsattr (AIX command) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:N. The only reference is to documentation (a primary source).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 99Electrons (talk) 07:47, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]