User talk:V1iciouslady

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You posted the following onto The Whispers page. I can not locate any reference to Hutson dying, or supporting your other claims. Can you supply a viable reference(s) ? If not, it will need to be deleted.

Derek R Bullamore (talk) 01:08, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In Memoriam[edit]

Marcus Hutson left the group in 1989 due to illness. When he passed away in 2000, the Whispers vowed to never replace Hutson, and now perform as a quartet.

February 2008[edit]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Living Single‎. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Ward3001 (talk) 03:28, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Living Single‎. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Ward3001 (talk) 03:28, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please review Wikipedia:Trivia sections & WP:RS. There you will find your answer. --Endless Dan 19:52, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

July 2008[edit]

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to Friends. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Contact me if you need assistance adding references. Thank you. Gwernol 18:22, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to reply to me you need to do so on my talk page, which is: User talk:Gwernol. Replying at Wikipedia talk:Talk page is not appropriate. I have removed your edit from there. Thanks, Gwernol 18:45, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Please also read WP:V and WP:OR which are two of the three core content policies of Wikipedia. Every editor is expected to follow these rules. While your edits may be true (I don't know) they lacked sources, so could not be verified. They also appeared to be conclusions that you had drawn, so they are original research. If you provide proper sources for your statements, then you will avoid both these problems and can add the material to the Friends article. Thanks, Gwernol 18:56, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2009[edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:35, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I Didn't Mean to Turn You On (song)[edit]

In 1986, "I Didn't Mean to Turn You On" was covered by Robert Palmer; that cover fared better in the charts than the original song.

Comment -

According to whom "that cover fared better in the charts than the original song"? Cherelle's song was a BIG hit, so who came up with this opinion? Because Robert Palmer was a Pop Artist? That is a biased and generalized statement, especially since none of the R&B radio stations EVER played his version of the song.

My suggestion - Cherelle's version was a hit with the R&B audience while Palmer's version was a hit with the Pop audience.

Feel free to discuss!

V1iciousladyV1iciouslady (talk) 20:03, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Survey Invite[edit]

I'm working on a study of political motivations and how they effect editing. I'd like to ask you to take a survey. The survey should take 5 minutes. Your survey responses will be kept private. Our project is documented at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Wikipedia_%2B_Politics.

Survey Link: http://uchicago.co1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_80J3UDCpLnKyWTH?Q_DL=2oczE7SODTUnF5j_80J3UDCpLnKyWTH_MLRP_88M7C1AwGxVhdB3&Q_CHL=gl

I am asking you to participate in this study because you are a frequent editor of pages on Wikipedia that are of political interest. We would like to learn about your experiences in dealing with editors of different political orientations.

Sincere thanks for your help! Porteclefs (talk) 15:26, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, V1iciouslady. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, V1iciouslady. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]