User talk:VP44444

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hello, VP44444! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! XLinkBot (talk) 22:02, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines
The community
Writing articles
Miscellaneous

July 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Big Time Love Song has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://www.facebook.com/bigtimerush/.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 22:02, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Big Time Bad Boy do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.  
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://www.facebook.com/bigtimerush/.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 22:11, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Big Time Love Song. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article.   — Jeff G. ツ 22:12, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Big Time Mansion. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.   — Jeff G. ツ 23:55, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.   — Jeff G. ツ 05:50, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Big Time Mansion[edit]

I have nominated Big Time Mansion, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Big Time Mansion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.   — Jeff G. ツ 23:57, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case[edit]

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/VP44444 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page.   — Jeff G. ツ 00:08, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Big Time Bad Boy[edit]

The article Big Time Bad Boy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Should be merged with Big Time Rush

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Diego Grez let's talk 19:12, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Big Time Dance[edit]

The article Big Time Dance has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Should be merged with Big Time Rush

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Diego Grez let's talk 19:12, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Big Time Bad Boy, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Please do not remove the PROD tags, these actions constitute vandalism and you could get blocked. Please don't do that anymore. Thanks! Diego Grez let's talk 19:41, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Big Time Dance[edit]

I have nominated Big Time Dance, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Big Time Dance. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Diego Grez let's talk 20:09, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Big-time-rush-jjj-interview.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Big-time-rush-jjj-interview.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 06:24, 8 August 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 06:24, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Big-time-rush-jjj-interview.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Big-time-rush-jjj-interview.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor (talk) 03:54, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Btr logo.png[edit]

File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Btr logo.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 03:56, 10 August 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 03:56, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Th btr logo.png[edit]

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Th btr logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:41, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Btr logo.png[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Btr logo.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:01, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

--PMDrive1061 (talk) 17:52, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

VP44444 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I've only been helping Wikipedia. User:Mario96 blocked me for no reason, because according to the "block page", he blocked me. I did not vandalize, as I was editing for the better. You have to unblock me and block him instead, because he has been abusing many Wikipedia accounts.

Decline reason:

He has been abusing many Wikipedia accounts and this appears to be one of them. Please review our rules on alternate accounts. TNXMan 20:36, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{{unblock|I have never abused a Wikipedia account. I've only been editing articles on "Big Time Rush" since people keep messing it up. For example, if you look at the "List of Big Time Rush episodes" section, the "Season 2: 2010-2011" bar is messed up. I was about to fix it until i found out I have been blocked. I have not been reported for abusing any accounts. It is for that reason you must unblock me. If you don't believe me, you can look at my "talk page" and you won't see see one article that says I have been abusing accounts.}}

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

I believe your explanation and it would seem that you got caught up while I was blocking some real Mario96 socks. I'm terribly sorry for the inconvenience and for the error. Thank you very much for your contributions and for keeping a cool head in the wake of this error.

Request handled by: PMDrive1061 (talk)

Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request.

Orphaned non-free image File:Big-time-rush-logo.jpg[edit]

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Big-time-rush-logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 03:36, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Big-Time-Rush.png[edit]

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Big-Time-Rush.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 03:36, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Big-Time-Rush.png[edit]

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Big-Time-Rush.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:32, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Big-Time-Rush3.jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Big-Time-Rush3.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Theleftorium (talk) 12:24, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Big Time Rush 0001.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Big Time Rush 0001.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 00:48, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Stephen Keys[edit]

The article Stephen Keys has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. The-Pope (talk) 16:13, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:BTRalbum.gif[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:BTRalbum.gif requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eeekster (talk) 01:17, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bigtimerushbtr.jpg[edit]

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bigtimerushbtr.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:39, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of songs by Big Time Rush for deletion[edit]

A discussion has begun about whether the article List of songs by Big Time Rush, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of songs by Big Time Rush until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 16:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Big Time Rush discography for deletion[edit]

A discussion has begun about whether the article Big Time Rush discography, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Big Time Rush discography until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 16:55, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bigtimerushbtr.jpg[edit]

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bigtimerushbtr.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 04:43, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Adding redirects[edit]

Hey, on the article iCarly: iGot a Hot Room, I noticed you added a redirect without notice. Please discuss it on the talkpage before adding a redirect. Thanks! Endofskull (talk) 21:59, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Big time rush.jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Big time rush.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free image with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria.

If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the image can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{non-free fair use in|article name that the image is used in}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the image. If the image has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 22:11, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ronhjones tagged it for deletion because you gave a rationale for a logo, which this image definitely isn't. I've declined to delete it, because the rationale is easily fixed; however, since the rationale wasn't valid, I've removed it. Please add a valid rationale soon; if you don't provide one within a week, the image will be deleted. Nyttend (talk) 00:35, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case[edit]

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/65.24.251.120 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page.--Illinois1986 (talk) 22:27, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:BTRTilForgetAboutYou.jpg[edit]

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BTRTilForgetAboutYou.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:30, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you[edit]

The Modest Barnstar
Thanks for your recent contributions! Mike Restivo (talk) 05:29, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of Big Time Rush concert tours[edit]

The article List of Big Time Rush concert tours has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not in source cited. No reliable sources = not notable (if real).

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SummerPhD (talk) 20:53, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Stephen Keys[edit]

The article Stephen Keys has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:MUSIC: no evidence of notability independent of the group.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SummerPhD (talk) 20:56, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Chelsea Ricketts[edit]

The article Chelsea Ricketts has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Best known for a minor role. Not notable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SummerPhD (talk) 21:03, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Stephen Keys for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stephen Keys is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen Keys until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. NW (Talk) 02:16, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dj sdwuvfzs 170x170-75.jpg[edit]

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dj sdwuvfzs 170x170-75.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 05:33, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:City Is Ours album cover.jpg[edit]

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:City Is Ours album cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:38, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:20100808022148!Th btr logo.png[edit]

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:20100808022148!Th btr logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:48, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of ICarly (iOMG story arc) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ICarly (iOMG story arc) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ICarly (iOMG story arc) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Geraldo Perez (talk) 16:10, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello[edit]

Hey VP44444, just wanted to let you know that I saw that you created the new article ICarly (iOMG story arc)--It would be great if you could also upload a picture for the related article ICarly.

Happy editing! Hope your day is going well and you are having fun. Jipinghe (talk) 18:31, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

October 2011[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to ICarly, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, reduces edit conflicts, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 21:18, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:457px-Seddie kiss HD 5.jpg[edit]

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:457px-Seddie kiss HD 5.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 05:01, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:20100808022148!Th btr logo.png[edit]

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:20100808022148!Th btr logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 18:14, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:20100808022148!Th btr logo.png[edit]

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:20100808022148!Th btr logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 17:43, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:BigTimeRushHolidayBundle.jpg[edit]

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BigTimeRushHolidayBundle.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:37, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Spongebob vs. SpongeBob[edit]

Hi, I've noticed you using "Spongebob" instead of "SpongeBob". Is there a reason for this? I'm asking mostly of my own benefit in case my instincts are wrong. But I've seen you change it here as well as here, here, here, etc., so I thought I'd ask ya. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:30, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, VP44444. You have new messages at [[User talk:Talk:SpongeBob SquarePants#Episode overviews|User talk:Talk:SpongeBob SquarePants#Episode overviews]].
Message added 03:28, 17 August 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:28, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries[edit]

Hi, VP44444, I would like to encourage you to please use edit summaries when making changes to articles, especially when reverting other editors' contributions ( so they know the rationale behind your bold edits. A few relevant diffs: [1], [2], [3] Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:01, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


stop Please stop reverting other editors' contributions without using edit summaries. While the bold, revert, discuss cycle is crucial to our community's editing process, leaving out the discussion step of the cycle runs contrary to community standards, and continued resubmission of contested content without discussion can be construed edit-warring. Diffs: 19 You are once again invited to a discussion at Talk:SpongeBob Squarepants Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:14, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at SpongeBob SquarePants (season 9). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

  • If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
  • If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. (You appear to be edit-warring with yourself. Instead, you should use the Show Preview button before saving.) Jackmcbarn (talk) 04:08, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@VP44444: A very specific, disruptive problem that I have with your edits, is that you appear to be making constant edit tests in the article space instead of finalizing your changes in your sandbox before submitting them. The result, is that your edits are taking up far too much of the article's edit history, and other editors' watchlists, without any significant constructive addition being made. For example, in these two edits, [4][5] you add trivial information about SpongeBob premiering in May, then you cut it. (And rightfully so.) And you've been having exceptional difficulty for days trying to work out the sentence that describes SpongeBob Season 9's transition to an HD format. The sentence was fine the last time I edited it, but then you added "with a picture suitable for HDTV" [6], which you then changed erroneously to "HDTV's" (erroneous, because plurals don't have apostrophes before them) [7], which you then changed to "format especially suitable for HDTV's"[8] etc. You really need to tone this stuff down. It's disruptive to the way other editors review articles. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:18, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

stop Please stop making edit tests in the article space. Use the preview button. If you continue this disruptive style of editing, (edit, save, revert, save, re-edit, save, delete, save) I will seek the attention of an administrator and/or begin a request for comment on your behavior. Examples:

Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:16, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't remove access dates from references. Because web pages are subject to change, giving the date that a URL was accessed is important, so that others know what version of the page was used as a source. Thanks. Trivialist (talk) 11:51, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

stop This is your last warning. Stop making disruptive test edits to live articles, even if you intend to change them back. Diff: SpongeBob S5, SpongeBob S6, SpongeBob S9 Cyphoidbomb (talk) 08:51, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WP/ANI[edit]

Information icon Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:37, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Big Time Rush[edit]

By editing this article through the semi-protection and disregarding the call for talk page discussion you have caused the article to be fully protected. I will be undoing your edit so that your preferred version will not be sustained. Do not misunderstand my message; I have no preference with regard to the article content. Discussion must take place, and consensus determined, before the protection will be lifted. If you have any questions or require any clarification you may leave a message on the article talk page. Tiderolls 23:55, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • No response at all? The re-sizing of an infobox image twice was more important than addressing another editor's concern with your editing a protected article? Tiderolls 08:11, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:25, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:BigTimeRushConcert.jpg[edit]

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BigTimeRushConcert.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:29, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:BigTimeAudition.jpg[edit]

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BigTimeAudition.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:07, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:VP44444&oldid=1142709224"