User talk:Vacumecleaner

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

February 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Glenn Rosewall has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. tutterMouse (talk) 13:07, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Glenn Rosewall. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Glenn Rosewall was changed by Vacumecleaner (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2009-02-10T13:11:17+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 13:11, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Dk and the cockslaps[edit]

A tag has been placed on Dk and the cockslaps requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. JCutter (talk) 06:01, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

April 2009[edit]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Dk and the cockslaps. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you. JCutter (talk) 06:10, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Glenn Rosewall. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. THEN WHO WAS PHONE? (talk) 06:15, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy due to persistent vandalism originating from your proxy server or network. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below. Mfield (Oi!) 06:28, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]