If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:
If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Valesaro Pictures with a link to where we can find that note;
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on the article Talk page. Alternatively, you may create a note on your web page releasing the work under the GFDL and then leave a note at Talk:Valesaro Pictures with a link to the details.
Otherwise, you are encouraged to rewrite this article in your own original words to avoid any copyright infringement. Thank you. Exxolon 22:20, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. Tiddly Tom 22:57, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Id just like to say that these gusy have tried to scam money from me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.37.135.181 (talk) 07:23, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Its a one-man solo scam artist, I know of another individual that was scammed out of money. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.119.235.67 (talk) 06:57, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
A tag has been placed on Valesaro, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD g11.
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 00:54, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from articles you have created yourself. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you.
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Merope 14:30, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
NONE OF WHAT I DID OR PUT UP ON HERE WAS BREAKING ANY RULES. I AM NOT ADVERTISING, NOR PROMOTING ANYTHING. ARE YOU ALL A BUNCH OF HOMOSEXUAL LOSERS, OR WHAT?!?!?!?!?!
Valesaro 14:33, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. Every single person on Wikipedia is a homosexual. Also, your edits include spamming, self-promotion, and personal attacks. You're getting one last chance. -- Merope 14:35, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Then tell me this please. If other film stars and companies can be listed on here, then why can't I? Does Wikipedia not believe in fairness and equality? I think it's reasonable to assume that if George Lucas or Steven Spielberg can have a listing then so can I. I am a film producer and director with my own motion picture company. Please advise. Thank you. Valesaro 09:30, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Um. George Lucas and Steven Spielberg are what we call "notable"; they are the subject of multiple, non-trivial, independent published sources, have won major awards, and basically meet the criteria set forth in our notability criteria for persons. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and is thus used to chronicle subjects that have already been covered in secondary sources. It is not a tool for self-promotion. -- Merope 12:45, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Valheader.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Videmus OmniaTalk 03:23, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button 
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. Tiddly Tom 22:57, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
