User talk:Vanished user 24kwjf10h32h/Archive March 1 - March 7 2008
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
 | |
| Wikipedia ads | file info – show another – #200 |
| This is a subpage of Vanished user 24kwjf10h32h's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Re: About sockpuppet
It takes quite a lot more to offend me. Just wanted to get sure you understood that, with your reasoning, any editor editing a couple of minutes after another makes him a sockpuppet. Cheers! -- ReyBrujo (talk) 02:20, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Mileyworld.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Mileyworld.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 15:13, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:12 Inch Collection 1999 (Rick Astley album).jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:12 Inch Collection 1999 (Rick Astley album).jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 02:50, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
I have requested that this article be moved back to its earlier namespace at Never Gonna Give You Up, replacing the disambiguation page which you recently created. I explain the reasons on the article's talk Page and in its entry at Wikipedia:Requested Moves. You are welcome to dicuss the proposed move at these places.
Also, when you make significant changes to an article please be sure to include an edit summary for the benefit of other editors. Thank you. InnocuousPseudonym (talk) 04:32, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Image:Mapa pichilemu.jpg
A tag has been placed on Image:Mapa pichilemu.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Mapa pichilemu.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jespinos (talk) 22:24, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
Your signature
Your signature is wildly in violation of WP:SIG. Please refactor it. Thank you. Horologium (talk) 00:48, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading Image:NeverGonnavideo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Yamla (talk) 17:43, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:FBI with Astley.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:FBI with Astley.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Yamla (talk) 17:47, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for March 3rd, 2008.
 |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 10 | 3 March 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:10, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
Image tags
Please do not remove image tags, such as you did to Image:NeverGonnavideo.jpg, unless you have addressed the issue. Thanks. --Yamla (talk) 18:59, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
CSD A7
I've removed the CSD tag you placed on Cheri (2009 film), because it does not fit the criteria. A7 only applies to people, organizations, companies, and web content, and as the subject of this article is a film it is not speedily deletable. If you still think the article should be deleted I would suggest that you pursue the articles for deletion process. Natalie (talk) 20:27, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
CSD A7 on OpenStore for File Servers
Please do not haphazardly throw out speedy deletion recommendations. Your reasoning is completely unrelated to the article content whatsoever.
According to the comment, "The reason given is: It is an article about a web site, blog, online forum, webcomic, podcast, online game, or similar web content that does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject. (CSD A7)"
This page has nothing to do with any of those supposed definitions. This page is describing a product and was created as a branch explanation of other software products.
According to A7, "A7 applies only to articles about web content or articles on people and organizations themselves, not articles on their books, albums, software and so on. Other article types are not eligible for deletion by this criterion."
Xaminmo (talk) 22:30, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:NeverGonnavideo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 20:10, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Dance mixes back.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:Dance mixes back.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 20:12, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
Pablo Zamora and Kurt Carrera
A tag has been placed on Pablo Zamora and Kurt Carrera requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. ✤ JonHarder talk 01:43, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
LoveToKnow Classic Encyclopedia
A tag has been placed on LoveToKnow Classic Encyclopedia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. ✤ JonHarder talk 01:47, 7 March 2008 (UTC)