User talk:Vdiest
User WikiProject South Africa
Coal-fired power stations in South Africa[edit]
The article Coal-fired power stations in South Africa doesn't exist, so I think you are actually referring to Category:Coal-fired power stations in South Africa? That is a category page, which is used to organise articles. To add to that category, you have to add the text [[Category:Coal-fired power stations in South Africa]] to the article on the specific power station. So the only way to add other power stations to the category is to write articles about each one. What you could do, though, is create an article List of coal-fired power stations in South Africa and make that a complete list. - htonl (talk) 12:38, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
- See Wikipedia:Categorization for a better explanation of how categories work. - htonl (talk) 12:55, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
- I stumbled on this by accident. If you visit the article on Colenso you will find a section on the now-defunct Colenso Power Station. Although I had first-hand knowledge of that power station (I lived there for 13 years), I believe that everything that I wrote came from the Eskom website rather than my first-hand knowledge (references in the article). (BTW, I am half English and half Dutch (though some might say a quarter Dutch and a quarter Fries), and was brought up in South Africa). I now live in the United Kingdom. Martinvl (talk) 21:11, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 22:15, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
Nice work on this list, it looks far better already --NJR_ZA (talk) 12:26, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
Coordinates in articles[edit]
You may want to take a look at how I formatted the coordinates in some of your pass articles. The template {{coord}} allows you to create links to WP:GeoHack, which allows users to view locations using Google Maps and other such tools. Let me know if you have any questions. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 05:45, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
WikiTravel[edit]
Hi,
Don't want to chase you away here, but I think you might also be interested in WikiTravel. It not associated with Wikipedia and concentrates on Travel, specifically How to get to places, the accommodation at those places, what to see and do and what it will cost you. Their rules on Notability and Referencing is a lot more relaxed. See South Africa and Kruger National Park as examples --NJR_ZA (talk) 08:26, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
Easy referencing[edit]
There is an easy way to add references. Visit Special:Preferences, select the Editing tab, check Show edit toolbar (requires JavaScript) and save your preferences. This will give you a nice toolbar above the text box when you edit.
Next, select the Gadgets tab and look under Editing gadgets for refTools. If you check this and save your preferences you will find a that you have a button on the right of the the edit toolbar labled cite. If you click on that and click on web or book etc you will get a nice popup form to fill in the reference details. Click on the correct location in the edit box where you want the ref to appear, the click on Add citation and a nicely formatted ref is inserted into the edit box. --NJR_ZA (talk) 13:22, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
Great job![edit]
Great job on Lion Sands Reserve! I just saw it, and it was really well done. I still haven't created any articles near that! Congrats(: Saebjorn! 00:20, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
Dams[edit]
I have added a partial list of dams at User:NJR ZA/Dams with data from ListofRegisteredDamsSep2009.xls. It still needs cleanup of wikilinks for the dam and river names, but most importantly, a lot of the data seems questionable. When using the volume and area provided to calculate the average depth, a number of dams calculate to ridiculous depths, up to 6500m. I'm rather hesitant to use data this as reference data if it is not good data. --NJR_ZA (talk) 16:30, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
Copyright concern[edit]
Hi, thanks for your contributions on South African rivers, but I am concerned that you are copying text directly from the eWISA website. While using websites as a source of information is allowed, copying text word by word from them is usually not because the text on the website is copyrighted (see the site's terms of use), and submitting such information to Wikipedia constitutes a copyright violation. The rivers are all notable, and deserve articles, but articles which are copied verbatim from websites are liable to being speedy deleted under speedy criterion G12. It is better if you can write about the rivers in your own words. Sjakkalle (Check!) 13:02, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
Status and Advice[edit]
As reviewing administrator, I recognize that you are using minimal amounts from these sources, and that sometimes the facts are hard to express in other ways. Even so, you should change the wording, so it does not show up as a copyvio in an automated search. DGG ( talk ) 16:18, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
I have made some minor changes in order to get the sorting working:
- Removed the {{convert}} template. Apparantly it does not play well with javascript sorting
- Move all the references and notes out of the numeric fields
I have also removed the {{disputed}} template and added {{refimprove}}. The data looks good, but it will still be a good thing to add more references if and when we can find them.
Thanks for all your hard work and thanks for taking my criticisms in the spirit it was intended. We now have an excellent List of reservoirs and dams in South Africa :)
I have placed a request to a robot (see bottom of Xenobot Mk V) to add all the new dam articles you have created to WP:SAFRICA. This should happen in a couple of days. Will do the same with the rivers at a later stage.
--NJR_ZA (talk) 16:17, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
Loskop Dam[edit]
Sure, can change it back if you like. I just thought that a dam and a reservoir in South Africa are often considered the same. In Dutch and maybe in English the dam refers to the wall specifically, while the reservoir may be the water body. But in South African usage "dam reservoir" sounds like a tautology. JMK (talk) 13:12, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
Bloukrans River (KwaZulu-Natal) and other articles[edit]
It is vital that you reference and categorise your articles. Please do so. Ironholds (talk) 12:35, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
Notice[edit]
Your addition to Pongola River has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. VernoWhitney (talk) 00:59, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
April 2010[edit]
Your edits to Mkhonto Local Municipality
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Wikipedia. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Extra999 (Contact me + contribs) 10:53, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
You are now a Reviewer[edit]
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.
When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 01:18, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
An Invite to join the Highways WikiProject[edit]
|
|
|
| - - - - - - - - - - - - WikiProject Highways - - - - - - - - - - - - | ||
|---|---|---|
| Hi, Vdiest, you are graciously extended an invitation to join the International Highways WikiProject and its new regional taskforces! The Highways WikiProject is an evolving and expanding WikiProject. We are a group of editors who are dedicated to creating, revising, and expanding articles, lists, categories, and Wikiprojects, or anything related to International Roads. This includes supporting existing regional road WikiProjects and fostering the development of new international highway WikiProjects. We have recently created five regional task forces focused on Europe, Asia, Africa, Oceania and Latin America.
To improve road and highway articles, here are guidelines for B class criteria. Please add any higher GA, FA quality articles to the international roads portal. Also, please help out by inviting new or unfamiliar editors with the Wikipedia:WikiProject Highways/New articles/Invite template. | ||
| We look forward to welcoming you to the project! | ||
JCbot (talk) 01:53, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
Stellenbosch to bid for Wikimania 2012![edit]
Hi Vdiest!
The nascent South African Wikimedia chapter has decided to bid to host Wikimania in Stellenbosch, South Africa in 2012. This would be the first Wikimania in South Africa, and would be a great advertisement for our country. Please take a look at meta:Wikimania_2012/Bids/Stellenbosch. If you can add to the discussion, please do. If you feel that you are able to do anything to help, please join the Wikimedia South Africa mailing list and let us know. Even simple messages of support are valued!
Best regards,
Proposed adding of "Type of waterfall" column[edit]
Hi Vdiest, please read & respond to my proposal at List of waterfalls of South Africa talkpage, since I see u made most contributions to this article. Thanks, Aliwal2012 (talk) 13:02, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Monuments in South Africa[edit]
Dear WikiProject South Africa Wikipedians
This is an urgent call from Wikimedia South Africa. We are currently working hard on the South African side of the exciting international photographic competition, Wiki Loves Monuments [1]. We have been planning to make this national competition really take off, but to do so, we need your help! The competition starts on the 1st September, and we need your help now! If you are interested in being part of or can help the Wiki Loves Monuments national organising team, then please join here [ http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Wiki_Loves_Monuments_2012_in_South_Africa]. If you have limited time, but want to help out at an upload marathon at a heritage site near you, please then contact either Lourie [louriepieterse@yahoo.com] or Isla [islahf@africacentre.net]. We look forward to hearing from you!"
Kind regards, Lourie
Sent by Lucia Bot in 14:05, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Call for Wikipedians in Residence in Africa[edit]
Hello,
I hope you are well and thriving!! WikiAfrica has just put out a call for two Wikipedians in Residence. One in Cape Town at WikiAfrica, at the Africa Centre; and the other for WikiAfrica Cameroon in Douala, at doual’art. If you are interested, please contact either Marilyn [marilyn.doualabell
doualart.org] for the WikiAfrica Cameroon call or Isla [islahfafricacentre.net] for the WikiAfrica position in Cape Town.
If you are not interested in applying, I would be very grateful if you could spread this call far and wide among your networks to ensure that both projects get excellent candidates. Here is the link for the information page: http://www.wikiafrica.net/two-wikipedians-in-residence-for-africa/
Best regards, Islahaddow
(This message was sent using Lucia Bot at 22:35, 16 November 2012 (UTC))
RfC:Infobox Road proposal[edit]
WP:AURD (Australian Roads), is inviting comment on a proposal to convert Australian road articles to {{infobox road}}. Please come and discuss. The vote will be after concerns have been looked into.
You are being notified as a member on the list of WP:HWY
Nbound (talk) 22:59, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
Notification of automated file description generation[edit]
Your upload of File:Attakwaskloofo1.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.
This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:30, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
- Another one of your uploads, File:Bainskloof pass.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:37, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
- Another one of your uploads, File:Baineskloof pass02.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:39, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
- Another one of your uploads, File:Bothmanskloof.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:01, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
File:Attakwaskloofo1.jpg missing description details[edit]
is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 04:26, 11 January 2014 (UTC)Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Mabusa Nature Reserve[edit]
The article Mabusa Nature Reserve has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- No content since 2009
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Xx236 (talk) 11:39, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!
Nomination of Olifants/Doorn Water Management Area for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Olifants/Doorn Water Management Area is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olifants/Doorn Water Management Area until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheMrP (talk) 19:18, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
The file File:Bergendal camping.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
File:Bergendal camping.jpg listed for discussion[edit]
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bergendal camping.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:03, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
The article Namibie Partial Reserve has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Article created in 2009 that is unreferenced.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 11:07, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Crocodile (West) and Marico Water Management Area for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crocodile (West) and Marico Water Management Area until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Boleyn (talk) 15:12, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
Masekwaspoort moved to draftspace[edit]
An article you recently created, Masekwaspoort, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dan arndt (talk) 05:59, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
The article Masekwaspoort has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:GNG, lacks any sources or references. Has been tagged a such since November 2009, without any improvement or referencing.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dan arndt (talk) 03:38, 15 February 2024 (UTC)