User talk:Veerashok163

Welcome!

Hello, Veerashok163! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 22:45, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

November 2014[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Dhedh has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Dhedh was changed by Veerashok163 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.983723 on 2014-11-01T18:13:50+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:13, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Dhedh has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Dhedh was changed by Veerashok163 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.962055 on 2014-11-06T16:05:25+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:05, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dhedh[edit]

If the speedy deletion has been declined by an administrator, you may not re-add it. If you feel that it should be deleted, you must make your case using the procedure at WP:AFD. ... discospinster _talk 16:14, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014[edit]

Hi Veerashok163. Thank you for your work on patrolling new pages and tagging for speedy deletion. I'm just letting you know that I declined your deletion request for Dhedh, a page that you tagged for speedy deletion, because the criterion you used or the reason you gave does not cover this kind of page. Please take a moment to look at the suggested tasks for patrollers, criteria for speedy deletion, and particularly, the section covering non-criteria. Such pages are best tagged with proposed deletion or proposed deletion for biographies of living persons, or sent to the appropriate deletion discussion. Thanks! ... discospinster _talk 16:15, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Dhedh with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. ... discospinster _talk 16:16, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Dhedh with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. ... discospinster _talk 16:21, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Dhedh. ... discospinster _talk 16:23, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been indefinitely blocked from editing for Vandalism. If you feel this block is unjustified, you may contest it by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. ... discospinster _talk 16:27, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Veerashok163 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am really trying for the some serious issue and I tried to delete that page. I am really sorry if that was my mistake. I was new on wikipedia and now learning how to raise my point properly. I want to ensure you that I won't repeat that mistake again and I will try to contribute something useful to our wikipedia society.

Decline reason:

I will accept, if you so claim, that you were attempting to act in good faith, but you removed the text nine times, and each time it was replaced by an experienced editor. did you not think to ask why? Please understand that you, as an ordinary editor, are not allowed to delete pages. Also please note that Wikipedia is not censored, and if an article is accurate and correctly sourced the fact that someone may find it offensive is not a reason for deletion. You have received, above on this page, guidance on many aspects of editing. Please read this (left-click on the blue links) and when you have done so apply again for unblock. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 21:58, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Veerashok163 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It isn't not about only me. It is against a race. Title which was used on your article is used by some dominant class to abuse the depressed class. You should know the fact that internet isn't accessible to everyone so you didn't get much problem with this article. I request you delete the article and unblock me otherwise I will be forced to take a legal action against website and person whoever created it. I understand the well that this isn't the right way to handle this issue but I do understand that you have some faith in humanity you will understand the problem and you will take seriously. In fact I sure that this article is created for fun purpose and to make mockery of someone. hope you will get my message. It is up to you weather you want to keep me block or whatever but it's your responsibility to handle the things seriously

Decline reason:

Piling on legal threats is not an effective way to get unblocked. Your talk page access has been revoked as a result. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 02:03, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.