User talk:Vendromeblah

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vendromeblah (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am repeatedly being blocked by bbb23 claiming I am a sock puppet of some identity I have never heard of.My intention is not to disrupt any edit or cause any problems.It is only to provide factual information to wikipedia with published sources and help in any way I canJust because people share same networks doesnt mean they are sock puppets.It is a technical assumption PLEASE Unblock me.I have a lot to contribute.If my contributions are considered as useless YES you may block me forever.But atleast give me a chance.Vendromeblah (talk) 16:09, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This account has only ever been blocked once, so if you have been repeatedly blocked on other accounts then you need to make your unblock appeal from the oldest one. And do not just create a new account whenever your latest account is blocked, for whatever reason. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:43, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

HELP-I have been blocked[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vendromeblah (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I seem to have been blocked indefinitely.I still cannot understand why I am supposed to be a sock puppet.I just happen to use a network that millions other use and many have abused it.It does not mean I have done so.I need to be given a chance.The Checkuser has blocked it.This effectively means I cannot edit Wikipedia anywhere.The person who has blocked me indefinitely has stated that there is a pattern to my editing.He knows nothing about the subjects I am editing and the pattern does not mean I am a sock puppet as long as I can contribute facts.Thank you and please consider this request once againVendromeblah (talk) 03:19, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

One open request at a time. See below. —DoRD (talk) 14:11, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

In your previous request you said "I am repeatedly being blocked..." (my emphasis). How many times have you been blocked? Under which accounts? Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 06:38, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I have been accused of being a sock puppet and a disruptor of edits based on "patterns" when I have provided substantial and valuable information.I may use different IP addresses and have specific subjects that interest me but that does not make me a Vandal or Sock puppet of some crazy identity I have never heard of.yes-If I contribute material that is of no vaue and does not meet wikipedia standards-By all means go ahead and block me.The page ==Chhota Shakeel== has been semi-protected when there is credible information that I can contibute in terms of the edit.I am an investigative journalist and not a vandal and to assume that I am a sock puppet because I use a network that a million people use is unfair and it is really sad to see me blocked permanently for an indefinite period of time.BBB23 removed all the logs on that article.He know nothing on that subject-on what basis has he done this?He repeatedly does this and I call it vandalism of a different kind.I only wanted to add an info box and add a few lines with citational sources that are published by credible platforms.
I repeat, on which other accounts have you been repeatedly blocked? Ignoring my question will not help your unblock chances. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:17, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
FRST TIME and permanently-My user page says This account is a sock puppet of Vaibhavpomal123 (talk · contribs · logs), and it has been blocked indefinitely.

Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sock puppet for evidence. This policy subsection may also be helpful.

I dont even know who Vaibhavpomal123 is
Can you help me sort this.Its too complicated.i cannot seem to figure it out.
This edit request to Chhota Shakeel has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
‹ The template Edit semi-protected is being considered for merging. ›

Your edit request is inappropriate. While blocked, you have access to this talk page solely to get unblocked. Nor did you suggest an edit, though had you done so, we'd have refused. --Yamla (talk) 11:18, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Refused even if factual content is contributed? Is not wikipedia about facts that are verifiable?Vendromeblah (talk) 11:21, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You are not permitted to edit while blocked. You have access to this page solely to discuss getting your block lifted. --Yamla (talk) 11:24, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

can you help me? I cant seem to get my way around to figuring this out.My first account and I am blocked forever?Vendromeblah (talk) 11:33, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock help[edit]

Retired

This user is no longer active on Wikipedia.

*Idont wish to be a part of this community that looks at everybody with suspicion and cannot forgive someone for creating two accounts by mistake - when he says so.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vendromeblah (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not a sock puppet,zombie or proxy.I am an investigative journalist whose only intention is to contribute valuable information which can be verified via sources.It is not my fault if a million users have the same IP address.Yes-It is my mistake that I created an account and hence am assumed to be a sock puppet Vendromeblah (talk) 11:36, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Well, your IP addresses are not used by "a million users". In fact, it is only you and Ivangregory at the moment. Unblock declined due to unambiguous, Confirmed abuse of multiple accounts. —DoRD (talk) 14:13, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I created two accounts because my IP address was being used by 'million users' not wikipedians.Thank You for the wisdom. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vendromeblah (talk • contribs) 21:01, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]