User talk:Veroni4ka.Lime

This is Veroni4ka.Lime's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: AirSlate (July 26)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Theroadislong were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

press releases and their own website are not independent sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:AirSlate and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 11:22, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the feedback, Theroadislong!

I'll correct the links and improve the writing for it to read like an encyclopedia entry. Veroni4ka.Lime (talk) 13:08, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Veroni4ka.Lime! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 11:22, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

paid editing[edit]

Hello Veroni4ka.Lime. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Veroni4ka.Lime. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Veroni4ka.Lime|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Theroadislong (talk) 09:30, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your answer @Theroadislong. I'm not getting payed to publish this article.

It's a startup founded by immigrants from my home country that recently became a unicorn. It was quite a big news since we don't have many of those.

Please note that I'm not the initial author of this draft but I believe that this is an interesting subject to cover, so I started correcting it. Unfortunately I lack experience in Wikipedia editing so I hoped that the community might help me and experienced editors like yourself could hint me towards making it more neutral. Veroni4ka.Lime (talk) 09:56, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022[edit]

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:

Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.

Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:04, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|reason=I have read and understood the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.

The COI is the state of origin of the company I intended to write about (the company founders are immigrants from Ukraine). I'm not getting compensated to edit this draft page but I have strong feelings for Ukraine and this has led to a conflict and reflected on making my writing being not neutral. I apologize to the Wikipedia community for this and hope for your understanding.

I will always ask the Wikipedia community to help review any edits on the drafts I make prior to publishing it and will keep always review any materials that I write to have a neutral point of view

I hereby kindly ask you to unblock my account}} Veroni4ka.Lime (talk) 08:53, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]