User talk:Veronica.Strazzari

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (May 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Veronica.Strazzari/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Veronica.Strazzari/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 19:31, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Veronica.Strazzari! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 19:31, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

Luca Locatelli article

Hello Veronica.Strazzari, I hope you and yours are well.

Many aspects of the article are good, layout, heaps of refs and so on.

The comments about neutral language/encyclopaedic tone are probably about such phrases as "...is a multi-award winning Italian...", "He produces his stories in collaboration with editors, journalists, environmentalists and scientists in order to further contextualize his research.", "Deeply rooted in documentary and journalistic production, his work revolves around the ‘making’ of the future'"

What's wrong? To use an Australianism: "too sucky", you are repeating what appear to be very flattering words either from the artist themselves or from articles heavily praising them. More neutral language would be something like "He has won a number of awards, including ..." "His practice has been describes as a colloboration...<ref>, described as 'making of the future'",<ref> "so and so states that his work is deeply rooted in documentary and journalistic..."<ref> So here you are talking about what is, not you talking about how great the artist is (they may be, but leave the saying of that to quotes from reasonable sources). Quote the sources, but as a reporting of their views not as a mutual celebration of the artist. Multi-awards: what are they, a source saying "multi-awards" is a poor source of this info.

Wikipedia endeavours to be a neutral reporting of notable things (not always successful, all that television and commercial-music stuff), so that means in commenting on art and artists, who are they, what do they do, what do people say they do? Don't forget there may be negative criticism, it may be a minority, but it reflects the overall view of the work. If the criticism is ignorant, then that might be able to pointed out ("Even though the critic has never seen the work...), if it is offensive ("I hate this art because it is by a person with brown eyes"), then yeah ignore it, or include it with any published criticisms of that criticism.

Not exactly short and sweet advice, but I hope it is of help. Thank you for starting this article, I hope it gets to the point of publication, please continue with your good work. Brunswicknic (talk) 11:16, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, Veronica.Strazzari, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at the our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

• Article development
• Standard layout
• Lead section
• How to write a great article
• The perfect article
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions ask me on my talk page or you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! CommanderWaterford (talk) 11:20, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding User:Veronica.Strazzari/sandbox

Hello, Veronica.Strazzari. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:Veronica.Strazzari/sandbox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:02, 18 October 2021 (UTC)