User talk:VeroniqueBellamy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Instant-runoff voting[edit]

I see that you're a Bernie supporter, which indicates to me that you would support fair voting reform. The Wikipage: Instant-runoff voting.

For the group fighting for it, check out: http://www.FairVote.org.

To see why it's necessary, check out: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wqblOq8BmgM.

It's supported by the Green Party: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eb7MQ7da6sg.

Suggestions:

  • Share on Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Everywhere
  • Post a sign in your front yard that says, "The USA needs Instant-Runoff Voting!"

KnowledgeBattle (Talk) | GodlessInfidel ︻╦╤── 20:39, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge[edit]

You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:40, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kent Hovind[edit]

Dear VeroniqueBellamy: Regarding the article on Kent Hovind, editors BiologicalMe and Ravensfire are correct. These are technical legal terms. The correct term for Hovind is "tax protester." That's the term used by the courts. Hovind was never charged with tax evasion (26 USC section 7201). He was charged with willful failure to PAY tax, which is a separate crime. Please review the article.

The news media (of which I am a former member) does tend to use the term "tax evader" incorrectly to mean anyone who commits a tax crime. Tax evasion is just one kind of tax crime. If a media report uses the term "tax evader" incorrectly, we try here at Wikipedia to be accurate, and a bit more restrained -- especially in articles on living persons.

Also, your conjecture in one of your edits about the lack of validity of a renunciation of citizenship is pretty much on target, but the problem is that it is YOUR conjecture. As Wikipedia editors, we have to avoid that sort of thing. Famspear (talk) 04:05, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]