User talk:Video killed the radiostar

Welcome!

Hello, Video killed the radiostar, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! DES ^(talk) 15:47, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Magic 1170[edit]

AfD nomination of Magic 1170[edit]

Magic 1170, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Magic 1170 satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Magic 1170 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Magic 1170 during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.Shoessss 15:24, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to say DELETE. This is not to be taken as a negative to the company or the individual writing the article. However, there is a misconception that Wikipedia can and should be used as a directory (or as we call it State side: Yellow Pages) or a listing of companies. Sometimes we forget that the Wikipedia project is supposedly an encyclopedia providing a research tool for individuals to explore “Note” worthy items that are not widely known outside there small area or are widely known, but the individual would like additional information. All-in-all, I believe the article will be deleted. However, as I stated earlier, please do not take this as a derogatory statement to you as the author or the company you are writing about. It is just a state of affairs that I believe is not a good fit for Wikipedia at this time.[[ —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Shoessss (talk) •

AfD nomination of Magic 1170[edit]

An editor has nominated Magic 1170, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Magic 1170 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 21:52, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Magic 1170[edit]

An editor has nominated Magic 1170, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Magic 1170 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 21:52, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on The Superstation, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you feel that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. ≈ The Haunted Angel 15:47, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright issue with The Superstation[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, The Superstation, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://tv.cream.org/specialassignments/radiocream/argilr.htm. As a copyright violation, The Superstation appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. The Superstation has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:The Superstation and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:The Superstation with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:The Superstation.

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. ⋐⋑ REDVEЯS 21:03, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Trax FM[edit]

Hi there

~~I just want to ask why you deleted a section of verifiable information in the Trax FM article, with no reason given for its deletion either in the edit summary or the talk page:~~

~~Edit in question: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Trax_FM&oldid=139039373~~

There is currently a dispute ongoing with that section, with one of the editors from the Lincs FM Group. --tgheretford (talk) 19:39, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ignore that last message, my popup tool which shows edits made by editors is showing false information. Apologies. --tgheretford (talk) 19:42, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DRV[edit]

I have userfied the deleted article here. Best, IronGargoyle 06:48, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Many Thanks! Video killed the radiostar 09:05, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Hospital Radio Lynn[edit]

A tag has been placed on Hospital Radio Lynn, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. WebHamster 13:08, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Thompson Creative[edit]

A tag has been placed on Thompson Creative, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per speedy deletion criterion A7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — iridescent 01:59, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tim Finlay[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Tim Finlay, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Tim Finlay. User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 16:31, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A note..from me[edit]

You may notice from the above that many ofmy articles are being deleted. This doesnt annoy me as such, thereare obvious reasons to not icludearticles on wikipedia. BUT!! Every article I have started is just as important as many many many articles on wiki.

If one hospital radio station is included then they all should be, the fact is theyre all small scale broadcasters that on whole probably arnt that important but to the hospitals they serve they are VERY important.

Thompson Creative a world wide producer of radio jingles has been removed, yet other smaller jingle companies remain.

An article on Tim Finlay, a highly respected DJ and radio broadcaster in Yorkshire has been deleted. This guy broadcast on three different stations at the same time and was a household name yet some guy called Phil Holmes remains. Who the fuck is he!?No doubt this is a vanity piece created probably by Phil Holmes himself!!!

Now i know what the answer will be here. It'll be "yes, your right, you can nominate any articles for deletion" well, the fact is why should I bloody bother!? Id be nominating forever and a day! Its ridiculous, infact i'd go as far as saying that there are some wiki jobsworths who want to make a name for themselves by nominating for deletion. These people are cretins who have nothing better to do with there time. So, if per chance your reading this why not find someone elses articles to delete? FACT: ALL radio is important!

Video killed the radiostar (talk) 21:31, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Dave Langer[edit]

A tag has been placed on Dave Langer requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Beloved Freak 21:58, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Radio Medica[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Radio Medica, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

low wattage or closed radio system available only within this hospital. Lacks 3rd party sources, lacks notability.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. RadioFan (talk) 20:07, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of IQ Beats for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article IQ Beats is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IQ Beats until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Stesmo (talk) 22:29, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Diana Luke for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Diana Luke is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diana Luke until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Flip Format (talk) 20:11, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Roger Kirk (presenter) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Roger Kirk (presenter) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roger Kirk (presenter) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Flip Format (talk) 20:15, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Steve England for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Steve England is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve England until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Flip Format (talk) 11:30, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Roger Kirk (presenter) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Roger Kirk (presenter) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roger Kirk (presenter) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Flip Format (talk) 10:52, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 1278 and 1530 AM West Yorkshire[edit]

The article 1278 and 1530 AM West Yorkshire has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Entire article is WP:OR and no sources are cited that would make the cut for WP:GNG. It seems that this was a short-lived temporary name for the radio station Pulse 2 and I cannot see why it needs its own article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Flip Format (talk) 10:27, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 1278 and 1530 AM West Yorkshire for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 1278 and 1530 AM West Yorkshire is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1278 and 1530 AM West Yorkshire until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

// Timothy :: talk 02:09, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]