User talk:Virginexplorer

Proposed deletion of The Knowledge Which No One Can Have[edit]

The article The Knowledge Which No One Can Have has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Essay with inadequate references, likely composed of lots of original research

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Anome (talk) 11:09, 16 October 2009 (UTC) The initial reason given was insufficient references. The verifiable references has been added. What else has to be done so that the article is acceptable to wikipedia. I have completely revised. Is there anything else which I have to paraphrase or delete? Kindly let me know.[reply]

AfD nomination of The Knowledge Which No One Can Have[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, The Knowledge Which No One Can Have, is being discussed for (possible) deletion. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Knowledge Which No One Can Have. Thank you. • Anakin (talk) 12:17, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

The need for this article[edit]

Keep First of all, this artcile is not out of any original research. Every part of the artcile can be found as facts in various textbooks and research articles. Students are generally informed on the relationship between the knoweldge one can have about a thing and the properties of things, and about the limits of human knowledge. No part of the article is a new knowledge acquired through any extensive research. Although it is told in the classroom, no attempt has been made to prepare and publish a formal article. The reason for preparing this article now is that the present day schools teacings make the students to think that there is no conceptual relationship among the subjects which they study in schools. Being a biophysical chemistry teacher, for the last four or five batch of students, I find that the students completely fail to beyond what they have studied in the undergraduate courses and make a exhaustive search on the knowledge base. Other than this, there is no intention in putting this artcile in wikipedia or any other site.

The article has been completely revised again so that it meets the wikipedia quality standards. If any further references or any modfifiation is to be know, kindly let me know before deltion. I can spent time to revise, if any further modification is required.

My humble questions to wikipedia are:

Are the information content of this article not known to the people before?
Is the information content of this article offensive?
Is this artcile inadequately referenced?
Is the information content of the article unverifiable?
Is this article worthless?
Do the younger generation have no right to know the knowledge which no one can have?
Do the younger generation be ignorant of the relationship between the properties of things and the human knowledge?

--Virginexplorer (talk) 10:33, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 10:31, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Your recent edit [1] seems to be announcing your intention to disrupt Wikipedia using other people as proxies. In addition, you seem to be trying to promote the link you posted in that comment by adding it to other pages. Please do not do this, or you will be blocked from editing. -- The Anome (talk) 13:06, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]