User talk:ViscontiEnsi

ViscontiEnsi, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi ViscontiEnsi! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like John from Idegon (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

November 2019[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making personal attacks towards other editors.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ST47 (talk) 21:26, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ViscontiEnsi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Actually I did not make personal attacks against anybody. I merely commented on contributor's research. Never attacked anybody no matter how you want to spin it. BTW I know you are friends with a certain user and wanted to ban for "sockpuppeting", but that didn't work because I didn't sockpuppet. Clearly there is a conflict of interest with ST and his friends.

The Block in question originates entirely from this talkpage, feel free to check the history of this page. If you read the rules for PA, not only did I not qualify under it, but first it's supposed to be ignored, then there's a warning after repeated attacks(which did not occur at all), then there's supposed to be an attempt at conflict resolution, etc, all come first before even a 24-hour block, let alone a permanent block, this only proved that ST has no reason for this block, except that he was friends with a certain user. No matter how much you care for 541, what you did is against Wikipedia policy, and doesn't even correspond with the article cited.

Summary:

1. I do not qualify under "harassment personal attacks".

2. Even had there been a qualification, it's supposed to be variously ignored, asked to stop, conflict resolution, and then given a warning. 3. ST is friends with a certain user, so the conflict of interest was very obvious to all who could read it.

Decline reason:

Your request seems to be "I didn't do it, but if I did, I had a good reason and shouldn't have been blocked for it." That's not very convincing. There is no entitlement to a certain number of warnings, or any warnings at all if it is deemed necessary. Personal attacks and harassment are not acceptable for any reason. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 10:39, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.