User talk:Vivaldi/Archive 6
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | ← | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 |
 Archives |
|---|
Sollog
I was happy to see that the article about Sollog was deleted. I spent many hours trying to convince people that using a weekly rag to trash a living person was in poor form for an encyclopedia. Sollog was a USENET crank, but he was hardly notable other than the meta discussion of himself here on a Wikipedia article about himself that he created himself and then later tried to remove when editors started using it to out him for criminal activities unrelated to his limited notoriety as a USENET crank.
I was also happy to see the article about Fred Phelps was heavily edited so that it wasn't entirely sourced to a supposedly unpublished book. I despise Fred Phelps as a person, but my hatred of the man should not influence the types of sources that are allowed to be used on Wikipedia, especially in articles about living persons. I tried in vain for many months to get people to understand that it is inappropriate to use unpublished works as sources of information about living persons.
I've also tried mostly in vain to get a few other articles about various evangelical churches and ministers free from poorly sourced and self-published works, mainly by preachers with opposing doctrinal views of Christianity. Reliable sources should ideally be independent third parties and not parties with active and fervent disagreement with the subject matter. Vivaldi (talk) 01:52, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.
When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 01:18, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
Re: Chris Brown (Nude photo incident)
Umm... excuse me but how is my comment "idiotic?!" It is a comment I put on there and I am the one who added that section, so don't judge my comments, okay?! The Smell of Magic 00:31, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
- The comment saying that the image "lives on forever on the Internet" is pure idiocy. Every nude photo of every celebrity lives on forever on the Internet. Why is this Chris Brown nude photo so special that we need to remind people that it "lives on forever on the Internet"? None of the other nude photos of celebrities have this line mentioned about their photos in Wikipedia, so why should we say it about Chris Brown's nude photo?
- Reminder- This is Wikipedia, please don't become attached to the words and phrases that you use when you edit. As a collaborative effort, the words you use will inevitably be edited to make them better or more clear by many many people as time goes on. Vivaldi (talk) 13:38, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 16
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Learjet 70/75, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bombardier (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ian Fried (actor), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Alice and Different Strokes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
File:MissionEarthTapeCover-01.JPG listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:MissionEarthTapeCover-01.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 10:39, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Personal Freedom Outreach for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Personal Freedom Outreach is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Personal Freedom Outreach (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.BayShrimp (talk) 20:38, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: Talk:TechJect Dragonfly UAV
Hello Vivaldi. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Talk:TechJect Dragonfly UAV, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The reason given is not a valid speedy deletion criterion. If you think the article TechJect Dragonfly UAV should be deleted, nominate it by WP:Proposed deletion or WP:Articles for deletion. JohnCD (talk) 17:14, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
- You are wrong. It most certainly does qualify for meeting one of the speedy deletion criterion, but I'm not going to waste any more time on that steaming pile of horse pucky that portends to be an encyclopedia article. It is PATENT NONSENSE, which is a perfectly valid reason for speedy deletion. It is gibbishish. Words on paper signifying nothing. You might as well have an article about Invisible Pink Unicorns. Oh wait. Vivaldi (talk) 17:37, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
- No. The speedy-deletion criteria are carefully defined, for good reason. Read WP:CSD#G1: it says "if you can understand it, G1 does not apply." You may not like what the article says, you may think it describes a failing or non-notable project, but you can understand it. It is not speediable: WP:AFD is that-away. JohnCD (talk) 19:47, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
- You are over-estimating my comprehension skills. I do not understand it. It makes no sense. And I don't think it describes a failing or non-notable project. I think it's a steaming pile of words that are unintelligible to sentient beings. I've already wasted too much time on it. Someone else will delete the page later when it goes through AfD. Vivaldi (talk) 21:56, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Vivaldi. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Vivaldi. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ina Fried, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Alice and Different Strokes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Vivaldi. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Spirit AeroSystems, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Subang (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:20, 30 May 2019 (UTC)