User talk:Vizulux

Vizulux, you are invited to the Teahouse[edit]

Hi Vizulux! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Rosiestep (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:07, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Romulo Yanes may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Visual Arts in [[New York]]. He assisted photographers Frances McLaughlin Gill, Irene Stern and Carl Fisher. Later he continued his career at Conde Nast's publication Gourmet.<ref>Gourmet

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:15, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mark M. Whelan FRSA[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mark M. Whelan FRSA requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Theroadislong (talk) 17:26, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Mark Whelan has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Mark Whelan. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 22:41, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mark Whelan (March 28)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chrissymad was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Still no independent coverage that establishes notability. As previous reviewers said, being a member of something that you pay to be in isn't particularly notable and neither is being stung by a jellyfish, even a deadly one. This needs to also be supported by significant coverage from independent sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mark Whelan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 16:12, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Mark Whelan concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Mark Whelan, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 20:57, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Mark Whelan[edit]

Hello, Vizulux. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mark Whelan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:25, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (April 5)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, Tessa Clarke, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Vizulux/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Vizulux/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:03, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @DoubleGrazing the author of "Tessa Clarke" reached out to me (outside of Wikipedia) and is going to delete their version, would you be so kind as to reconsider when the duplicate (first submission) is erased? Vizulux (talk) 17:38, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tessa Clarke (April 9)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Numberguy6 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

All sources are primary.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tessa Clarke and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Tessa Clarke, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Numberguy6 (talk) 05:35, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. The sources such as BBC, The Guardian, The Times, The Sunday Times, etc are verifiable, reliable and primary; therefore I am confused by your rejection, does this mean major journalistic publishers are no longer considered reliable anymore (with the journalist's name on the article, which would mean most journalists would be removed) or do I have to include the secondary sources in order to pass the submission requirements? Thank you in advance for your time. Vizulux (talk) 01:13, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Tessa Clarke has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Tessa Clarke. Thanks! SK2242 (talk) 03:55, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Tessa Clarke has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Tessa Clarke. Thanks! GoingBatty (talk) 16:33, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I think I need to change the article title therefore to "Tessa Mayes" because the majority of references pertain to her married name. Just out of curiosity, what are some examples of how a living person is identified when they change their name due to a divorce? Vizulux (talk) 21:45, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tessa Clarke (June 23)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tessa Clarke and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Tessa Clarke, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

asilvering (talk) 03:57, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Tessa Clarke[edit]

Hello, Vizulux. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tessa Clarke, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:03, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Tessa Clarke[edit]

Hello, Vizulux. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Tessa Clarke".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:57, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]