User talk:Volcano00
June 2009[edit]
Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Criticism of atheism, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Old Moonraker (talk) 11:58, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
- I disagree. I deleted content that was not appropriate for that page. But I understand and next time I will put valid reasoning for the removal of stuff. Also you have a nice username. --Volcano00 (talk) 00:37, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
- There is inappropriate content in Criticism of atheism, but wholescale deletions like that are best delivered in stages. This gives other editors a chance to assimilate what's going on and will help you dodge such automated tools as ClueBot and Abuse filter. I see that another editor has reverted you as well, but don't give up, just proceed carefully! --Old Moonraker (talk) 06:14, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
- More unexplained deletions today. Where was the edit summary?--Old Moonraker (talk) 08:43, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
- I have added an edit summary this time. --Volcano00 (talk) 10:45, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
- OK, let's see how that one gets along. --Old Moonraker (talk) 10:52, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
- I have added an edit summary this time. --Volcano00 (talk) 10:45, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
- More unexplained deletions today. Where was the edit summary?--Old Moonraker (talk) 08:43, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
- There is inappropriate content in Criticism of atheism, but wholescale deletions like that are best delivered in stages. This gives other editors a chance to assimilate what's going on and will help you dodge such automated tools as ClueBot and Abuse filter. I see that another editor has reverted you as well, but don't give up, just proceed carefully! --Old Moonraker (talk) 06:14, 20 June 2009 (UTC)