User talk:Voortrekker70

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Voortrekker70, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Teahouse.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents / Department directory

The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)
The Signpost, our newspaper

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

Voortrekker70, good luck, and have fun. 25 CENTS VICTORIOUS ^☣ 11:53, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Military intelligence[edit]

I have military intelligence logo Boyal12598 (talk) 16:52, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Revert[edit]

I reverted your edit on Indian Army operations in Jammu and Kashmir. Please explain clearly why the matter should. go? DTM (talk) 17:37, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020[edit]

Hello, I'm TheImaCow. I noticed that you recently removed content from List of Kashmiri Hindus without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. TheImaCow (talk) 07:23, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm S0091. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Research and Analysis Wing, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. S0091 (talk) 19:28, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at CIA activities in Pakistan, you may be blocked from editing. 17jiangz1 (talk) 20:34, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at 2016–2018 India–Pakistan border skirmishes. Blablubbs (talk) 11:11, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 15[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Research and Analysis Wing, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BND (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:26, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020[edit]

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to Khalistan Zindabad Force ‎ while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. GSS ^💬 17:04, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you blank out or remove content from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Border Security Force. Materialscientist (talk) 06:27, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

China-India skirmish edit[edit]

Please revert your edit here [1]. Its miss-representing the Asian News International report on Chinese casualties which states 43 soldiers were killed AND injured. Not just killed. EkoGraf (talk) 18:26, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please revert this edit as well [2]. 4 Indian soldiers were injured in the Pangong Tso incident on the 10th, while 72 were injured in the separate Sikkim incident. That's a total of 76 injured that day. EkoGraf (talk) 19:00, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The source for the 72 injured is right there in the infobox and there is one in the article itself as well. Here, I will link them [3][4]. Also, again, please reinsert into the infobox the fact that 43 is both "killed and injured" and not just "killed". Thanks! EkoGraf (talk) 19:07, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2020 China–India skirmishes. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. As soon as EkoGraf pointed out some of the mistakes you did at the article you should've gone through WP:NPOV, WP:RS, WP:MOS rather than edit warring in the article. Your recent edit here is nothing but a continuation of the above attempted disruptive edits. Please refrain from such editing behaviour. Drat8sub (talk) 07:38, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 2020 China–India skirmishes, you may be blocked from editing. Drat8sub (talk) 08:08, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020[edit]

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to Border Security Force while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. GSS ^💬 13:03, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries[edit]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! regentspark (comment) 00:54, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Editing issues[edit]

Hello. I took a look at your edits and notice that you both remove sourced information as well as add unsourced information. And, you neither use article talk pages nor your own user talk page when other editors post here. This is not promising. Please note that there are discretionary sanctions in effect on all India/Pakistan articles (I'm posting the formal notice below). --regentspark (comment) 01:11, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions alert[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

--regentspark (comment) 01:12, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Faizabad. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 08:59, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Research and Analysis Wing. S0091 (talk) 05:05, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. regentspark (comment) 12:16, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Voortrekker. You've been blocked because you're repeatedly removing sourced content and are not communicating on talk pages (not even through edit summaries). Please rethink your editing style once this block ends. --regentspark (comment) 12:18, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Research and Analysis Wing[edit]

Hi Voortrekker70, while the edit summary is a good start, I highly suggest starting a discussion on the article's talk page as the changes you are suggesting may be controversial. Content decisions on Wikipedia are made by consensus. You may also want to read WP:TP for guidance on using talk pages. S0091 (talk) 22:50, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 23[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Research and Analysis Wing, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jammu and Kashmir (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:31, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

While editing this page , I was cautioned by Wikipedia that thier is blocked link somewhere in citation provided by me. Please, can help and remove blocked link . Voortrekker70 (talk) 06:39, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Chittisinghpura massacre. There is no consensus about the perpetrators of the Chittisinghpura massacre. Read Talk and stop POV pushing. — kashmīrī ^TALK 09:40, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have no right to bully an amateur editor. It's a clear fact that Chittsinghpura massacre was committed by globally designated terrorist organization Lashkar-e-Taiba. Voortrekker70 (talk) 09:50, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is based on sources and not on any editor's "clear facts". The available sources disagree as regards the perpetrators. Please do not push your version into an article that is edited and discussed by a lot of editors.

Also, for a new editor with a relatively low edit count you've collected an incredible number of warnings and a block. Doesn't it makes you wonder about your editing? — kashmīrī ^TALK 09:56, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There are multiple citations and references given itself in the article about Lashkar-e-Taiba being the perpetrator of this attack. I am not pushing "my own version". Most of the warning are based on small and minute mistakes, and on me not writing the what part of article has been edited by me. 90% of my edition is based on wikipedia verified citations and references. Your bulling tactics goes against the rules of wikipedia. Your own talk page is filled with multiple allegations. Voortrekker70 (talk) 10:15, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Several sources independent from the Indian Government, including the ones who interviewed the massacre survivor, do question the official Indian narrative. This is a global encyclopaedia, not a mouthpiece of the Research and Analysis Wing. — kashmīrī ^TALK 10:24, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Pilgrimage places in India, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — kashmīrī ^TALK 10:39, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What has Reaserch and Analysis wing to do with a terrorist attack by Pakistan based Islamic terrorist organization. I know your are verified Anti-Indian bot. You digging up my old edits is clear example of your bullying tactics. You should not misuse your position. You don't have any logical argument to back up the claim that perpetrators of this attack were not LeT terrorists, so you have gone down to troll me. Voortrekker70 (talk) 11:41, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 30[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Arambam Boby (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Meitei

Bedashwor Singh (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Meitei

Khalistan Zindabad Force (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Jammu and Kashmir

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced content in biographies - last warning[edit]

Re: this, you don't get to decide what ethnicity or caste/community someone belongs to. That content must be self-identified and properly sourced. You have a wall of warnings on your talk page about problematic editing, and this is yet another problem. Don't add content unless you provide a source. If you add any more unsourced or poorly sourced content, especially as it pertains to the very sensitive area of Indian ethnic backgrounds and castes, you will have your editing privileges interrupted. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:38, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

HAL Tejas[edit]

Plese dont remove things like fails verification tags as you did on this article without some explanation why you disagree, preferably on the talk page, thanks. MilborneOne (talk) 10:22, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]