User talk:Voteforthisguy

April 2015[edit]

Hello, I'm Loriendrew. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Salt Lake City because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 01:18, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at University of Kansas. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 01:20, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 01:22, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 02:26, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My ban[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Voteforthisguy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I ran a test to see how quick people on Wikipedia were to notice mistakes. I made spelling errors in a few pages. The test had good results. I was not trying to vandalize anything, and I meant no harm. I just wanted to run a test . That is why I ask you to reinstate my editing privileges. Have a good day! P.S. The results were very good. All were fixed in 5 to minutes Voteforthisguy (talk) 12:30, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Wikipedia is not a place for you to run an experiment or test our abilities to stop nonsense edits; what you did was waste time from other editors who had to fix your tests. I see no compelling reasons to unblock this account. only (talk) 12:37, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

My edits[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Voteforthisguy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Im really sorry. I did not mean any harm. Could you at least give me a timetable, or reinstate my other account BlockyMan1? I really like editing, and stopping vandalism. I promise I will never do this again. Again, I really like editing and helping Wikipedia. I know what I did wrong, and try my best to make productive edits. Please reconsider this. Voteforthisguy (talk) 12:40, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I really do not understand your motivation for your disruptive editing here. Nor do I see what you need two accounts.--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 12:56, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

.

Note to the next admin to look at this: BlockyMan1 was not directly blocked at the time of this request; I have now blocked it indefinitely. Presumably the "reinstate my other account" refers to that account having an autoblock on it. only (talk) 12:52, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My ban[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Voteforthisguy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Anthony my reason for two accounts is because this is my test account that I used specifically for the test. The other one is my good account, which I did not abuse or vandalize or do anything bad with. My reason for running the test (which is stated in my first appeal) is because I heard about a guy who ran a test with the same thing I did and I thought it would be fun to try. Please reconsider. Voteforthisguy (talk) 13:15, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

If you're impressionable enough to come to the conclusion that wasting other volunteers' time is "fun", then perhaps it would be better if you returned when you are more mature. Kuru (talk) 14:32, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.