User talk:Vulcanstar6

i dont need all those fancy templates, so it looks fairly plain.

Guidelines:

Please do not use profanity in your comment
Please keep comments about me and/or other users kind, and respective
Please do not delete ANY comments (that includes yours)

Things I might do:

I reserve the right to delete anything placed on this page
I may close a discussion on this page, but not delete it
I may limit a discussion to the parties involved

You will have a response in at least 48 hours

Re: Computer FAC[edit]

This disscusion has been CLOSED. Vulcanstar6 00:03, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry to have had to be instrumental in shooting down your FAC effort - but it truly had to be done. I just wanted to make sure I didn't make an enemy in the process! I'd like to cooperate in making this article fly. I'm not exactly a long-time Wikipedian - but I do have one FA under my belt (Mini) with another winding it's way through the system as we speak - so at least I know what to expect. I've also worked with a HUGE range of computers - starting back in the early 1970's - I've even designed one or two of them.

What we need to do is to look at the 'big topic' articles - Physics, Chemistry - and attack the problem that way. We need the most high level, abstract definition we can come up with - then we need to subdivide the subject matter rationally and spend a lot of thought on organising links to all of the other computer-related Wikipedia articles.

SteveBaker 04:11, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Thats fine, you and the others were perfectly kind, and helpful. no enemies. Vulcanstar6 04:13, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template request[edit]

This discussion has been CLOSED. Vulcanstar6 01:56, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A response has been posted to your request for an explicit language warning template. --CBDunkerson 12:11, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your last comment on my RFA[edit]

This discussion has been CLOSED. Vulcanstar6 01:56, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think you're a bit confused - and understandably so. Geo Swan added a comment just below my question under your vote. Then I added a reponse below Geo Swan's comment. At some point - either when Geo Swan trimmed his lengthy critique of my performance or at some other point - the formatting got messed up so it looks like one big comment from me. Quite complicated. I'll try to fix it. KI 18:24, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, i see. Vulcanstar6 18:25, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RFA[edit]

This discussion is LIMITED to parties involved. Vulcanstar6 01:56, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, this is Matt Yeager. I wanted to thank you for your vote on my request for adminship. The count was something like was 14/20/5 when I decided to withdraw the request. My decision was based on the fact that there are enough things wasting people's time on the Internet that doomed RFA's shouldn't be kept up for voters to have to think about. Regardless of the rationale behind your vote, I hope you will read this note for an extended note and discussion on what will happen before I make another try at adminship (I didn't want to clog up your userpage with drivel that you might not be interested in reading). Thank you very, very much for your vote and your time and consideration of my credentials--regardless of whether you voted support, nuetral, or oppose. Happy editing! Matt Yeager ♫ (Talk?) 01:39, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I read the page, and it was insightful (it had the overtone of "thanks for the vote, b*t*h", haha). i will most likley vote support next time. the only reason i didnt is becuase you werent here for 6 months. Vulcanstar6 01:46, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RE:your RFA[edit]

This discussion has been CLOSED. Vulcanstar6 00:09, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I see you have your name on the list of users who would like help with their eventual RFA. I'm here to help. after reviewing your edit count, contributions, and behiavor, heres my advice before we make you an RFA:

you have almost 2000 edits, i suggest you wait until you have 2000 to RFA, i myself would like 2000 to get my vote. (though im not too strict)

thats about it! everything else looks good, user page is nice, talk page is in order, you seem to be a nice kid. and youve been here long enough.

if you would like help with forming the actual RFA page, contact me. (i'd be happy to nominate you.) Vulcanstar6 02:17, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The only other thing I'm mainly waiting for is a bit more mainspace contribution, as that's what a lot of people are after (So I'd like to get the remaining 200 or so edits in mainspace.) Werdna648^T/_C\^@ 14:08, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Anglicanism and the Anglican Communion[edit]

Hello! I noticed that you have been a contributor to articles on Anglicanism and the Anglican Communion. You may be interested in checking out a new WikiProject - WikiProject Anglicanism. Please consider signing up and participating in this collaborative effort to improve and expand Anglican-related articles! Cheers! Fishhead64 23:28, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have? thats news to me. either way, thank you for the invitation.(i find this humorous as well becuase i have an atheism box on the top of my user page, :P)Vulcanstar6 00:30, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Halo[edit]

Wikiproject Halo
Call to Members

In order to streamline and coordinate further improvement to Halo-related articles, there is an active roll call to all Wikipedians who put themselves down as participants. To show your continued involvement in the project, simply go here and sign your name. If you do not wish to be active, et al, simply ignore this notice and you will not be bugged again. Thanks, David Fuchs^{(talk / frog blast the vent core!)}