User talk:WRK

Welcome!

Hello, WRK, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!  Cary Bass ^demandez 12:47, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Deprecated succession box?

this:

has been replaced by this:

--emerson7 | Talk 02:58, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

in fact, it is. many haven't yet been cleaned up. --emerson7 | Talk 03:19, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

June 2007

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Romualdo Pacheco. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. emerson7 | Talk 17:39, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

tit-for-tat? lol...very mature. the facts remain the same. you are way off-base in your synthesis. you should simply take some time to cool your jets and review just how many of the redundant, deprecated navs have been--and are being--replaced. re the vandal revert....mea culpa, that was honestly and accident. cheers! --emerson7 | Talk 19:22, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Hi there, I noticed you've been talking to emerson7 about his edits. I'm having some problems too. He doesn't reply to messages and I find a lot of his edits to be detrimental, particularly in the case of the Takemitsu article which I'm working very hard at to get to FA quality. Not sure what to do... Matt.kaner 22:14, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Userpage Thanks

Thanks for fixing my userpage! It seems to work well on both IE and mozilla.

		What a Brilliant Idea Barnstar
		I, Chrislk02, award you this brilliant idea barnstar for your soultion to my userpage formatting issues. Thanks again and keep up the good work. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 17:16, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for your correction on Saxophone Quartet Concerto(Keuris)!(Addaick 13:28, 20 July 2007 (UTC))

My pleasure. WRK (talk) 21:57, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Quotation typo

Hi. Not a criticism, but a question. You corrected a typo in an quote that I placed in the American Cookery article. The spelling of millennia is, of course, correct. However, the spelling from the quotation source was millenia. I copy/pasted it. Are we supposed to leave direct quotes as they are, including spelling errors and such? Or not? I always had the understanding that in research (especially historical research), one should quote exactly, character by character, warts and all. Not sure what WP policy is, and can't seem to find it. Thanks. — Becksguy 05:39, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

Hmmm, I don't really know. In such cases, you'll often see (sic) in a quote. It might matter whether the quote is from a written source or originally from a spoken source. If the former, I would leave it misspelled and add (sic). If the latter, I'd probably fix it. Those are my two cents - I'll leave it up to you for the final decision.  :) WRK (talk) 11:55, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

The new NHL uniform is a new jersey, not the state of New Jersey

Just thought you'd like to know, since you made the edit. :P Croctotheface 19:01, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

Woops. Sorry about that. WRK (talk) 01:01, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:Patriarchy (ethnographies)

Template:Patriarchy (ethnographies) has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — Neitherday (talk) 22:34, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Nomination of Cliff Hangers for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cliff Hangers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cliff Hangers (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. --Gh87 (talk) 11:34, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Thomas Baltzell.jpg

The file File:Thomas Baltzell.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 27 June 2019 (UTC)