Jump to content

User talk:WaltzingwithWeasleys

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Welcome![edit]

Hello, WaltzingwithWeasleys, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Shalor and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Additional Resources
  • You can find answers to many student questions on our Q&A site, ask.wikiedu.org

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 19:38, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Notes[edit]

Hi! Here are my notes:

  • I like that you are discussing this on the article's talk page with other editors. I just wanted to highlight that since communication is so incredibly important on Wikipedia. It looks like they've made some tweaks to the live content since you last posted to the article as well.
  • It looks like the two major concerns brought up by the other editor were sourcing and how things were written. Basically, they just wanted more sourcing that covers the UFW as it pertains to labor history and to show where its major. As far as verbiage goes, it's always a good idea to be careful of point of view terms like powerful, as they're so frequently used to pose arguments and emphasize viewpoints that they're seen as being at least somewhat inherently non-neutral. Attribution is often a good way around concerns like this since it will attribute these claims to the person(s) making them.
The sourcing looks like it will probably be one of the bigger sticking points since you will need to provide sourcing to show where there's a wider impact outside of the single state. Remember - we can only summarize what has been explicitly stated in the source material, so the sourcing really is key for this.

At this point what I recommend is to further discuss this on the article's talk page. You can provide more sourcing and list them there to back up your points. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 21:12, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]