User talk:Wannabeanhonestscientist

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 06:17, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Aubrey de Grey. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:10, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Aubrey de Grey article[edit]

Hi. I thought I would send a personal message, and try to explain a couple of issues with your edits.

1. Making claims about a living person needs a lot of care. You really have to have very reliable and verifiable sources before you make claims, especially when those claims are about relationships.

2. You can't revert more than 3 times in 24 hours. I'm assuming that the IP edit was also you, so that's 4 reverts within a 24 hour period. I'd suggest going to the talk page to discuss these edits, rather than making any more reverts. Spacecowboy420 (talk) 08:47, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Thank you very much giving me the advise. I will do my best to deliver FACTs to the public.

Hello, I'm Prof. Mc. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Aubrey de Grey has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Prof. Mc (talk) 20:57, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for contravening Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 06:34, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wannabeanhonestscientist (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I included the public information. Aubrey de grey documentary. But the wikipedia page dis not includ it. <redacted> Wiki should include it. Wiki information is too biased for him. Your blocking is not reasonable. Please remove it, so I can keep edit it. I will put all the reference.

Decline reason:

Because of further BLP violations in your unblock request, I have revoked your ability to edit this page. See WP:UTRS if you wish to make another request. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 19:47, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.