User talk:WarHawk

Supreme_cmdr please stop using this SPA and sock puppet and wait till the ban on your account stops. Please do not revert whole chunks of text as you are doing now. Kerr avon 23:39, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You cannot be serious. So anyone who edits this page is now Derek Smart, me or someone else? Have you heard of the WP:GF? WarHawk 00:08, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for edit warring on Derek Smart for a period of 24 hours. To contest this block, please reply here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock}} along with the reason you believe the block is unjustified, or email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Cowman109^Talk 00:27, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring is clearly getting nowhere on the article. It's much better to discuss instead of simply blindly reverting other user's attempts to improve the state of the article. Thank you. Cowman109^Talk 00:27, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet Block[edit]

{unblock|I am not a sockpuppet. Seems to me like you have a think against that Supreme_Cmdr fellow because apart from incorrectly blocking him for blanking, you have now once again incorrectly blocked both of us for being sockpuppet. } WarHawk 20:08, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm reducing this block back down to the ~ 4 hours remaining on the original 24 hour block, since CheckUser has refuted the sockpuppetry allegation. Mango juice^talk 20:39, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Autoblock[edit]

{unblock-auto|204.13.5.61|Autoblocked because your IP address has been recently used by "WarHawk". The reason given for WarHawk's block is: "Edit warring...".}

I removed the autoblock. Things should be working fine now. Cowman109^Talk 15:07, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Its all good now.WarHawk 18:22, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

3RR[edit]

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert a single page more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. Note that you're at four reverts on the Derek Smart article for today. Ehheh 14:49, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reverts[edit]

Do not pointlessly and needlessly revert comment and make defamatory remarks in your edit summaries Lordkazan 14:37, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There was NO additional information added by Kerr. The edit was unnecessary. WarHawk 14:46, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]