User talk:We233ws

Welcome!

Hello, We233ws, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! DavidOaks (talk) 18:31, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

September 2010[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:24, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Man. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:57, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Man, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Wikipedia is not censored for anyone, so stop removing this perfectly acceptable image, and stop your edit warring -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:58, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:20, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RFC for Man[edit]

Hi. In the light of the current dispute regarding the inclusion of an image in the article Man, and the heated exchanges that have led to the need to temporarily protect the article, I have started an RFC at Talk:Man#RFC: image in article. Please do add your opinion, and hopefully we can achieve a policy-based consensus. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 21:19, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Man[edit]

As one of the parties in the dispute, you can not decide for yourself that a consensus has been reached to remove material - especially as a consensus clearly has not been reached. You must wait for an uninvolved person, who is experienced with assessing consensus, to make the decision. Best regards, -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:10, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

PS: Apologies for the "vandalism" edit summary - I intended to add a summary saying "Consensus has not been reached", but I hit the wrong Twinkle button. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:19, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please wait for a consensus on whether or not the image has to be removed before you remove it from the article. Discuss everything at Talk:Man to help come to a conclusion instead of just removing the image. You are on the verge of being reported for edit warring for this. --5 albert square (talk) 02:49, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Dabomb87 (talk) 03:07, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the second time you have been blocked for edit-warring over the image in Man, including violation of the three-revert rule. If you don't clean up your act and learn to abide by Wikipedia's normal dispute-resolution norms, you may be facing a much longer block the next time around. Dabomb87 (talk) 03:11, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reblocked[edit]

For continued edit warring through the form of sockpuppetry with this sock, Itiiti2itiitiitiitiitiitiiti (talk · contribs), I have reblocked and extended your block to 2 weeks. Continued sockpuppetry and edit warring will result in an extended block. Elockid ^(Talk) 04:02, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have extended your block to indefinite for repeated edit warring despite four blocks and continued sockpuppetry. Elockid ^(Talk) 21:26, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]