User talk:Welldug

Welcome![edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, Welldug! Thank you for your contributions. I am Vanjagenije and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Vanjagenije (talk) 12:05, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An award for you![edit]

		The Human Rights Barnstar
		Very promising first article! Keep it up, and ask for help anytime you need assistance. Djembayz (talk) 01:11, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

We always need more articles on Africa and on human rights. I did an article on Refugees in Cameroon a while ago; you might consider creating Refugees in Chad with some info on the folks fleeing Nigeria. There's also a lot of material in The Uganda Journal that hasn't made it into Wikipedia yet. --Djembayz (talk) 01:11, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join WikiProject Uganda, WikiProject Human Rights, and the Teahouse![edit]

Sign up at either of these message boards, and you can meet other editors with your interests. Or you can find folks who specialize in coaching new editors at the Teahouse.

This user is a participant in WikiProject Uganda

WikiProject Human rights invitation[edit]

WikiProject Human rights
Dear Welldug,

We would like to invite you to join WikiProject Human rights, a group of Wikipedians devoted to improving articles related to the Human rights. If you're interested, consider adding yourself to the list of participants and joining the discussion on the talkpage. Thank you!

Hello! Welldug, you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse. The Teahouse is an awesome place to meet people, ask questions and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us!

--Djembayz (talk) 01:11, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Peter Paul Piech has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Peter Paul Piech. Thanks! FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 18:36, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Peter Paul Piech (May 17)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Adyoo3 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Peter Paul Piech and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Adyoo3 (talk) 23:56, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Peter Paul Piech concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Peter Paul Piech, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:37, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Ed Emery (writer) has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ed Emery (writer). Thanks! /wia /tlk 22:44, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ed Emery (writer) (December 4)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ed Emery (writer) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 22:47, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ed Emery (writer) (February 20)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ed Emery (writer) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:16, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Peter Paul Piech concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Peter Paul Piech, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Peter Paul Piech[edit]

Hello, Welldug. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Peter Paul Piech".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Puffin ^{Let's talk!} 10:42, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ed Emery (writer) has been accepted[edit]

Ed Emery (writer), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 01:18, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lord Lisvane[edit]

His title is Baron Lisvane. He is referred to as Lord Lisvane, as is normal for barons. There is no such title as "lord" in the UK peerage except for the pretitle used by the younger sons of dukes and marquesses. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:20, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]