User talk:Werideatdusk33

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

=

Orphaned non-free image (Image:VieuphoriaVHS.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:VieuphoriaVHS.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 00:38, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject The Smashing Pumpkins[edit]

I've noticed you've been making edits to pages concerning The Smashing Pumpkins. Because of this, I'd like to invite you to join the WikiProject The Smashing Pumpkins. There, you can find others to collaborate with on articles concerning The Smashing Pumpkins, and maybe even help bring some pages to featured status. Regardless of whether you join or not, thank you for your edits. Godlord2 06:07, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vinyl Adore[edit]

I noticed that you mentioned that you owned a vinyl copy of Adore different than what we currently have, and I was wondering if you could possibly scan it to replace what we have now (which is, as you said, unsourced). Thanks, --Brandt Luke Zorn 06:16, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:SP_Zeitgeist_green.JPG[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:SP_Zeitgeist_green.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. The Sunshine Man 17:50, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:SP_Zeitgeist_orange.jpg[edit]

I have tagged Image:SP_Zeitgeist_orange.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. The Sunshine Man 17:51, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Skunk (band)[edit]

A tag has been placed on Skunk (band), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --Finngall talk 22:21, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Zeitgeist[edit]

Regarding your edit with the description "touched up a bit of the language... why call it "Corgan's decision to reunite the band with only two members"? whats the source on it being Corgan's CHOICE?". I didn't revert your edit because it's just as accetable, but I think what that sentence is saying is that he made the decision to reunite with only 2 members, regardless of whether that was his original intention. In the end, it's still his choice to go ahead with 2. Make sense? Cheers :) The KZA (formerly MrHate) 04:39, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You reverted literal devices saying that doesn't exist. I'd like to direct you to this site. You're probably right about the use in the article, however. :) Lara♥Love 19:33, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Wolf Man[edit]

Hey, I just wanted to let you know that you should have used the "move" feature to move the article from The Wolf Man (2008 film) to The Wolf Man (2009 film). This feature moves the page history, whereas you just created the new articles and copied/pasted. The page histories are supposed to carry over, so I'm going to request an admin to move the page histories. Just letting you know for future reference. —Erik (talkcontrib) - 03:26, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Corgan[edit]

History is irrelevant in such cases and my comment was directed at no individual. If a page is categorised based on an unsubstantiated claim then that is wrong (though it seems to be the most common of practices on this resource). There was no requirement to research the genesis of this article. 86.17.211.191 17:41, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Image talk:Billy Corgan 24.05.07.JPG, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD G1.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. OsamaK 02:33, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, Wikipedia is not a forum! --OsamaK 10:07, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fwd: Early 1989 Demos[edit]

See Template talk:Smashing Pumpkins#Early 1989 Demos. --PEJL 14:03, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Splogo.png)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Splogo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:14, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jimmy Chamberlin[edit]

Hey there! I know you've worked quite a bit on the Jimmy Chamberlin article and I was wondering if you think that a nomination to become a good article would be a good idea right now, or if you think that the article could use more work before it is nominated. Thanks for the award from a while back, by the way. --Brandt Luke Zorn 04:07, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, it's now nominated, though it won't be reviewed for a while as the music section of WP:GAN is severely backlogged right now. --Brandt Luke Zorn 04:29, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
A GA review for the article is now up, courtesy of Drewcifer3000. I've pretty much addressed all of the issues except one, which I have to ask you about. The sentence that begins "Chamberlin has a somewhat old-fashioned recording sentiment..." has been challenged for POV reasons. I don't have the source you used for it, so I have to ask you if "old-fashioned recording sentiment" or something to that affect was actually on the DVD; if not I'd recommend rewording it. Thanks, --Brandt Luke Zorn (talk) 10:17, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Coat of Eyes[edit]

Hey, I see your a Billy Corgan/Smashing Pumpkins fan, cool. There might not have been a lot written about "Coat of Eyes" YET! That's just because this information is finally being shared after 20 years and so many fans figured they knew everything about Billy and his life already. But the truth of the matter is this was the band that started the path for Billy Corgan to eventually form the Smashing Pumpkins, without "Coat of Eyes" there would more then likely be no "Marked" or "Smashing Pumpkins" for that matter. Of course Billy Corgan would have been successful in some band but there would be a very great chance it would not have ever been with "The Marked" or "The Smashing Pumpkins". I think it would be a shame for fans trying to find out more about there favorite artist's background to not have this information. Additionally I'm not sure if your familiar with Todd White but this was a quote from him on Netphoria about "Coat of Eyes" "From speaking with pre-SP musicians/friends of Billy, the names mentioned (Greg Bates, Jim Marcus, Angel Espada) are certainly legitimate. In fact, Greg was more commonly called Greggy." And another quote from another very well know long time fan Pmac "I have notes from one of my first conversations with RER (Ron Roseing) (this was back in 99) when I asked him for old song titles and he mentioned "Drowning in the Flowers" that was done with "Greggy". I would consider these legitimate 3rd party sources. Additionally, I recently came upon a link (http://www.rspaa.org/rspaa/Demos/Pre-Pumpkins/) that has one of the "Coat of Eyes" Billy and Greg's Home Demos Vol. 1 songs "I Pray For More" inaccurately listed as The Marked - August 1986 (studio demos) This song is Billy on guitar and sound effect vocals and Greg Bates on lead vocals. Let me know what we should do here? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Eaccess07 (talkcontribs) 04:38, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Coat of Eyes again[edit]

Fair enough, Is that something you would do then? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Eaccess07 (talkcontribs) 05:05, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:SP Zeitgeist book.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:SP Zeitgeist book.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 20:15, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Sttemplogo.gif)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Sttemplogo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 14:48, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ronald Reagan[edit]

Hi. Thanks for your recent edit to Ronald Reagan, but please remember to describe all your Wikipedia edits with an edit summary. Thanks, Happyme22 (talk) 22:22, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of The Barbarians (film)[edit]

I have nominated The Barbarians (film), an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Barbarians (film). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. SilkTork *What's YOUR point? 13:53, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Qotsa logo.png)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Qotsa logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 10:45, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Zeitgeist[edit]

I'll help you get it up to GA; it's pretty close now, it just needs some trimming around the edges. Also, I think the Outtakes section should go, but I thought I'd ask you about it first. --Brandt Luke Zorn (talk) 04:15, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I took out "FA Stomp", but now the section's only two songs long. Shouldn't the information be merged elsewhere in the article or removed? Besides, both songs seem poised for a future release anyway. --Brandt Luke Zorn (talk) 05:42, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Charles Manson[edit]

Just a note to let you know that it is against WP policy to insert a contact address for anyone, regardless of status. See Wikipedia:BLP#Privacy_of_contact_information for discussion regarding this. Wildhartlivie (talk) 20:08, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I do apologize, I'm not sure how that happened. Wildhartlivie (talk) 03:16, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Zeitgeist sales on SP Discography[edit]

See my reply on the talk page. There are some common misconceptions about what the RIAA certification is and how it works. WesleyDodds (talk) 09:14, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

SP's song[edit]

Hi, is it this edit ok? --87.7.119.178 (talk) 12:18, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:SP Zeitgeist blue.JPG)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:SP Zeitgeist blue.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:03, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:SP Zeitgeist green.JPG)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:SP Zeitgeist green.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:03, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Weezergreen.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Weezergreen.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:02, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

D&D articles for Wikipedia 0.7[edit]

Hi there!  :)

As someone who's worked on D&D and/or RPG articles before, I'm inviting you to participate in our goal to both improve articles that have been selected to be placed in the next Wikipedia DVD release, as well as nominate more to be selected for this project. Please see the WikiProject D&D talk page for more details. :) BOZ (talk) 21:59, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject: Dungeons & Dragons[edit]

Hi! I’ve been working on a lot of ‘’Dungeons & Dragons’’ articles lately and saw that you were a member of WikiProject Dungeons & Dragons), and am inviting you to rejoin Wikipedia’s D&D group. I've been hard at work removing tags placed inappropriately on D&D articles, as well as modifying articles to remove tags that were placed legitimately. In addition, I have been compiling related articles together so that the articles are longer, making it easier to remove tags and to have short articles on lesser topics by just putting it into another appropriate article (links to such compiled articles can be found on my userpage). Check out the project here , and ask any questions that you may have here. Thank you for your time. Drilnoth (talk) 21:00, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:SP nothingeverchanges.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:SP nothingeverchanges.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:55, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Sp moon.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Sp moon.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:58, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Countrymike.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Countrymike.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:05, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Smashing Pumpkins WP now Smashing Pumpkins taskforce[edit]

As you were listed as a member of the previously inactive Smashing Pumpkins WikiProject, I'd like to inform you that it has been reactivated as the Smashing Pumpkins taskforce. You can sign up here. WesleyDodds (talk) 02:18, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Sp mashedpotatoes cover.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Sp mashedpotatoes cover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:12, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Sp mashedpotatoes d1.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Sp mashedpotatoes d1.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:12, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Sp mashedpotatoes d2.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Sp mashedpotatoes d2.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:12, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Sp mashedpotatoes d3.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Sp mashedpotatoes d3.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:12, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Sp mashedpotatoes d4.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Sp mashedpotatoes d4.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:12, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Sp mashedpotatoes d5.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Sp mashedpotatoes d5.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:12, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Zeromelvoin.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Zeromelvoin.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 11:58, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Zeromelvoin.jpg[edit]

Replaceable fair use
Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Zeromelvoin.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 11:58, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Astral Planes[edit]

Astral Planes has been redirected to The Smashing Pumpkins, this was done because there is no indication of how this song might meet WP:NSONGS. It may one day meet these notability guidelines but not today. If the song reaches a national chart, it will meet those guidelines for example. If the song is included on an album, please update the redirect to that album article. Please be aware that very very few songs meet these notability guidelines while guidelines for albums are not as strict. Its not about whether or not a particular song "deserves" a page, they've got to meet notability guidelines.

Please do not replace the article again. I'd rather not have to protect the page which will only make crating an article for the song more difficult should the song meet guidelines in the future.--RadioFan (talk) 20:09, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Werideatdusk33. You have new messages at RadioFan's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Nicole Fiorentino. The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Nicole Fiorentino has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. NW (Talk) 00:50, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:SPWWMM.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SPWWMM.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:38, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:SPAstralPlanes.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SPAstralPlanes.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:39, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:SPWWMMcd.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SPWWMMcd.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:43, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer[edit]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 01:08, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:SPWWMM.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SPWWMM.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:39, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:SPWWMMcd.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SPWWMMcd.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:46, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:SP freak cover.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SP freak cover.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 05:08, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Sp2010lineup.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Sp2010lineup.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 14:24, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sp881005.JPG[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sp881005.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:39, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 28[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Billy Corgan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mystic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:38, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Sp gish reissue.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Sp gish reissue.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. — ξxplicit 01:53, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Sdreissue.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Sdreissue.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. — ξxplicit 01:53, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article VOLSER has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

dictionary definition

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Keφr 12:23, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You're invited: Art & Feminism Edit-a-thon[edit]

Art & Feminism Edit-a-Thon - In a city near you! - You are invited!
The first ever Art and Feminism Edit-a-thon will be held on Saturday, February 1, 2014 across the United States and Canada - including Chicago! Wikipedians of all experience levels are welcome to join!

Any editors interested in the intersection of feminism and art are welcome. Experienced editors will be on hand to help new editors.
Bring a friend and a laptop! Come one, come all! Learn more here!

SarahStierch (talk) 05:30, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Depeche Mode - Violator.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Depeche Mode - Violator.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:58, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Being Beige cover.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Being Beige cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:54, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 4[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited TheFutureEmbrace, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Bass and Mary Star of the Sea. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Songs of Faith and Devotion[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Songs of Faith and Devotion you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Casliber -- Casliber (talk) 10:20, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Songs of Faith and Devotion[edit]

The article Songs of Faith and Devotion you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Songs of Faith and Devotion for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Casliber -- Casliber (talk) 22:20, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Umm...hi, are you going to try and address any issues raised on Songs of Faith and Devotion? Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 21:08, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Songs of Faith and Devotion[edit]

The article Songs of Faith and Devotion you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Songs of Faith and Devotion for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Casliber -- Casliber (talk) 01:41, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:ElectoralCollege2000-Large.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 22:04, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Evening Descends for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Evening Descends is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Evening Descends until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Walter Görlitz (talk) 21:17, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Werideatdusk33. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Freshcuts big.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Freshcuts big.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:35, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Eric Remschneider has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Successful musician but doesn't meet WP:MUSICBIO or WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 12:32, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Three Stooges in popular culture for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Three Stooges in popular culture is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Three Stooges in popular culture until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 01:04, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Smashing Pumpkins -The Aeroplane Flies High - vinyl cover.jpg listed for discussion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:The Smashing Pumpkins -The Aeroplane Flies High - vinyl cover.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ―Justin (koavf)TCM 18:23, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]