User talk:Werldwayd/Archive12 (2020)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


This is an archive of Werldwayd talk messages. My current talk page is here: User talk:Werldwayd. Please leave messages only on that page.

Disambiguation link notification for January 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Yamar Samb, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Yamar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 15 January 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Love Me Baby concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Love Me Baby, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:23, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

Hi

Hope everything is good with you. Could you please take a look at the articles about Christopher Wollter and Julia Dufvenius. Any help is appreciated as always. Thanks.BabbaQ (talk) 12:17, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 January 2020

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:10, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gunther Göbbel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stand by Me (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 15:42, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Lift Me Up (Olivia Newton-John and Darren Hayes song) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Lift Me Up (Olivia Newton-John and Darren Hayes song), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:25, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 8

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Akcent (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Madonna
City Gate (Frankfurt) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to University of Frankfurt
Sadik (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Sadek

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:25, 8 February 2020 (UTC)


Need assistance with the Singles section in Patrick Fiori's Wikipedia Page

I noticed you helped a lot with that section, so thank you so much! Now, I just need to figure out how to get rid of one more thing that I don't think he sang without ruining all your hard work.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patrick_Fiori#Singles

I don't think Patrick ever sang All By Myself, so I tried to get rid of it, but it kept messing with the table and even when I tried to fix it, it still looked bad. Please help. Thanks in advance. Hajiru (talk) 11:15, 9 February 2020 (UTC)


A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
Thank you for your help! Have a barnstar! :D Hajiru (talk) 22:27, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Rihand (disambiguation)

Notice

The article Rihand (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unnecessary disambiguation page. Just two dabs at present, both are kinda WP:PTM, and one of these topics is the primary one anyway (I would argue the dam, since it gets 5x as many pageviews), but Rihand currently redirects to the river. Hatnotes should be used for navigation here.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. buidhe 00:09, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Christopher Wollter

On 15 February 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Christopher Wollter, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Swedish actor Christopher Wollter started his career as a teenage reporter for the SVT children's television show Barnjournalen? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Christopher Wollter. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Christopher Wollter), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

BabbaQ (talk) 00:03, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:The-British-Esperantist-Vol1No1.jpeg

Thank you for uploading File:The-British-Esperantist-Vol1No1.jpeg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 15

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

City Gate (Frankfurt) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to University of Frankfurt
Patrick Fiori (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Garou

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:04, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:A-little-respect-audio-playground.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:A-little-respect-audio-playground.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:22, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Love Me Baby

Hello, Werldwayd. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Love Me Baby".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:11, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Beur FM

Notice

The article Beur FM has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:RS

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BonkHindrance (talk) 03:38, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 22

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Al-Manar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Manar
Tættere på himlen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Søvnløs

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 15:00, 22 February 2020 (UTC)

"Hot Girlz" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Hot Girlz. Since you had some involvement with the Hot Girlz redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 13:03, 23 February 2020 (UTC)

"DJ Bl3nd" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect DJ Bl3nd. Since you had some involvement with the DJ Bl3nd redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Jalen Folf (talk) 01:53, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Jaffa-film.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jaffa-film.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:32, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

Mizanur Rahman Azhari

Dear friend Werldwayd, I hope you are fine. I’ll be very grateful if you will please take a look at the Mizanur Rahman Azhari page, and at the most recent comments on my own talk page. Another editor has created an excessively frivolous article, listing, for example, dozens of non-notable lectures referenced only by YouTube. I’ll be enormously grateful if you can help to keep this article reliable and sensible in scope and focus. Thank you. All good wishes, George Custer's Sabre (talk) 05:41, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

  • Welcome. For one the article is very poorly written. Even in grammar it needs huge improvements, let alone that the YouTube sources quoting each and every YouTube tape unacceptable and promotional. As if it is some sort of advertising. Any way I'll correct language and leave the rest for AfD discussion where I also left my comments. werldwayd (talk)

Disambiguation link notification for February 29

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Al-Manar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Manar
Jake Hoot (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Better Off Without You

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:38, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 1 March 2020

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:47, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

Draft:The Rigga-Ding-Dong-Song concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:The Rigga-Ding-Dong-Song, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:27, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Lift Me Up (Olivia Newton-John and Darren Hayes song)

Hello, Werldwayd. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Lift Me Up".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:09, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited James Newman (musician), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page One in a Million (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:50, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Haigazian-university logo.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Haigazian-university logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:36, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

Canto Católico

Good evening Werldwayd, I've read your article about the song 10,000 Reasons (Bless the Lord). I am not an expert of Christian music but I think this Spanish group has made a notable music and video.

I won't sponsor the choir, that I don't know perosnally and to which I hadn't any kind of contact. They publish uniquely free video on Youtube and aren't mentioned yet on en.wikipedia. I was just looking for a quotation rather than a WP article.Do you think this is the case?

Thanks for your eventual opnion and help. Micheledisaveriosp (talk) 23:00, 19 March 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Municipal political parties in Winnipeg

A tag has been placed on Category:Municipal political parties in Winnipeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 13:53, 23 March 2020 (UTC)

"Jana (disambigation)" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the redirect Jana (disambigation) should be deleted, kept, or retargeted. It will be discussed at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 March 23#Jana (disambigation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 19:46, 23 March 2020 (UTC)

"Saadalla (disambigation)" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the redirect Saadalla (disambigation) should be deleted, kept, or retargeted. It will be discussed at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 March 23#Saadalla (disambigation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 19:46, 23 March 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 March 2020

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:43, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

"Slimane (disambigition)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Slimane (disambigition). Since you had some involvement with the Slimane (disambigition) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. TheAwesomeHwyh 18:56, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:The Rigga-Ding-Dong-Song

Hello, Werldwayd. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Rigga-Ding-Dong-Song".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 20:41, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Branco, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Branco & Gilli (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:21, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Megaheavy

Hello, Werldwayd

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Amkgp and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've proposed an article that you started, Megaheavy, for deletion because it meets one of the relevant criteria and I believe that the article obviously and uncontroversially does not belong in an encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to prevent the deletion:

  1. Edit the page
  2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
  3. Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Amkgp}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Amkgp (talk) 04:56, 10 April 2020 (UTC)


Nomination of Mike Dreyden for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mike Dreyden is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Dreyden until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. gnu57 09:12, 12 April 2020 (UTC)


Speedy deletion nomination of Smoke Dawg

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Smoke Dawg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smoke Dawg. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. TwinTurbo (talk) 17:36, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

G4 nominations

You are not qualified to review WP:G4 speedy deletion nominations of articles, because you are not an admin and cannot see past revisions. Even if you think you are right, please do not remove G4 nominations in the future; post a message on the talk page to contest the deletion. Primefac (talk) 19:37, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

@Primefac: Is there any written policy/guideline on that? Olisaiuer (talk) 16:37, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
You mean, other than the template itself? If this template does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion: a non-admin cannot see what was in the old version, and therefore cannot make that call. Primefac (talk) 16:48, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited South American Board of New Federations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page President (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 15:18, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

Icekiid moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Icekiid, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Loksmythe (talk) 03:55, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of List of The X Factor finalists (American season 1) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of The X Factor finalists (American season 1) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of The X Factor finalists (American season 1) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ajf773 (talk) 09:39, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 25

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Mohammad Yasin (politician) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Mohammad Yasin
Sirte (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to SIRT

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:08, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

"Vincent (given name)(version 2)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Vincent (given name)(version 2). Since you had some involvement with the Vincent (given name)(version 2) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Regards, SONIC678 18:24, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 April 2020

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:18, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

Hi

I hope you are safe in these times of COVID-19! Anyway, as always any help on Gunnar Seijbold is appreciated. Regards.BabbaQ (talk) 10:11, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.231.63.209 (talk) 07:47, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 3

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Heuss l'Enfoiré (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to GLK

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:22, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation

@Werldwayd: I have reverted your move. You did not discuss it anywhere. Also, there is another Jesuit priest named James Martin (as seen in the hatnote) therefore "Jesuit priest" is an ambiguous disambiguation. Elizium23 (talk) 22:53, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 10

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

My Friend the Wind (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Engelbert Humperdinck
Vasil Garvanliev (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Nick Carter

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:02, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi

Please take a look at the article about The Skandia man that I created. He is very likely to be revealed as the killer of Olof Palme who was shot in 1986. As Swedish police will announce the final results of the investigation now in June. --BabbaQ (talk) 19:36, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

Regarding your minor edit on "Modern Loneliness"

Hey, I was just taking a look at the edit(s) you made on "Modern Loneliness" and was wondering on why the second part of the intro should be moved in 'Background and impact'. I based the article on previous articles made on songs/singles, including "If I Were a Boy" and "Everything I Wanted", with the latter being more of a similar length to the article. Those two articles I mentioned put a brief summary of each section in the intro, which is what I though I did (or at least it was my intention). Here's a link to the current revision and the (previous revision) I'm referring to.

Also, besides that, what are your opinions on the article based on the grading scheme? What can I improve on for this and future articles? Thanks for all the help. BenevolentBeast (talk) 03:03, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

---

Greetings Matthew

Move of paragraph from intro

The reason I moved that second section lower Matthew is that I felt the intro was too long anyway. Usually that type of material we place in "background" section. But now I realize the subject matter of this song particularly what he tries to convey in the music video is very relevant in this case, so it is well worth placing after all in the intro, which I have now done reversing my edit, although in general such material belongs to the background section. The examples of the other two songs was relevant and I have reconsidered my edit and reinstated it.

You have done a wonderful job Matt for a brilliant song and clearly a very talented singer songwriter. He has this aura about him that one brief look, and you are impacted by his personality. And you get hooked to what he's gonna say. So you can be proud of what you have done for a song that didn't chart very well but is far more precious than those making the Top 10 any time. I knew next to nothing about Lauv 2 days ago. But then I saw his MTV Live performance and I was captivated and checked your page on Wikipedia and made the edit. By the way, I never knew about Lauv and this is the only one I've listened to. I'll rectify it later when I have time, but for now I want this song to sink in if you know what I mean. I don't want to dilute my pleasure with other songs of his. This is sublime enough and now I've seen like 10-15 different takes and its amazing.

Reservations

But still I have strong feelings about some excerpts which I personally do not feel really belong there in an intro. For example: " It received mixed reviews from critics with a consensus view on what it stands for." Sure... But anything receives mixed reviews. Why highlight this in an intro? This is just a subjective view of some "experts". Also the whole sentence is not "well written". It is a huge downer for me. Or for example this which is borderline "trivia" stuff unfit of an intro: "Fans were featured on the video as well, with some dancing with him to the track, and others through making a cover of the song." Doesn't add much to what the essence of the song is. Me I would have put this interactive thing with fans in the "music video" section instead where it belongs.

My suggestion is to keep second paragraph more simple like:

QUOTE: A song revolving around feeling lonely in the modern age, the lyrics express that although people are more connected than ever due to the rise of social media, this connection still has its negative effects as most are not genuine and does not replace real-life relationships. The accompanying music video revolved around Lauv using social media but not feeling happy nor positive while using it, relating to its lyrics. The single peaked at number 14 on Billboard's US Bubbling Under Hot 100 chart. UNQUOTE

and relegate the more offbeat comments lower... But that's just me. Give it a thought and do what you feel is appropriate.

Already what you have done Matthew is tremendous for any song in Wikipedia. This is already impressive beyond belief. The length you have gone to for a worthy coverage is mind boggling. It is a "labour of love" actually and very much worthwhile. I am sure it was greatly rewarding and gratifying to you personally and you'll remember this edit many years from now as one of your "high points" in editing.

Appearances

But I would add, if I were you, I would add some significant performances of the song in "Appearances" new section on the page. For example his appearance in Tonight Show with Jimmy Fallon here. This is highly significant. You can mention the whole setting in this performance, singing in the public, then in a couch setting with what you think are actors, then suddenly they become this fascinating backing vocalists, then the standing ovation.

Another very notable performance that needs to be included is the MTV Live performance here. Actually this was the first time I heard the song and it is being put on MTV Europe video programming all over Europe. The British MTV has put it in their Top 40 show in the UK as a possible coming hit. Known as "Modern Loneliness (MTV Live Performance)", this version has become, at least in UK and European continent, an "official live version" of the song for obvious reasons, even more so than the actual music video itself. I dedicate this particular MTV performance to you for your profound work on this song in Wikipedia.

Also significant is the "Modern Loneliness" Acoustic (Live on MTV news) found here with no backing vocalists for a change. It is significant as it is a national broadcast.

Other significant appearances which can be mentioned in passing on the page is performance during the Rolling Stone "In My Room" IGTV series here and in GMA here. There's also the Album Release Party performance with IHeartRadio LiveXLive here

All these "appearances" would make a wonderful two three sentences to highlight media presence and impact.

Lyrics

I just love the section "Critical reception" section. You have done huge research in tens of publications and media outlets and it is just perfect. I reread it three more times and it's amazing. I also went through some of the actual articles you quote to read what actually they were saying.

About the explanation of the lyrics, its good you point out song is about online connections and loneliness. You highlight " "Modern loneliness, we're never alone / But always depressed, yeah / Love my friends to death / But I never call and I never text, yeah". But then there are part of the lyrics that relate to relationship with parents. This is not covered at all in the page which is a shame as it is central to the song. The opening lines make it very clear: "I've been thinkin' 'bout my father lately / The person that he made me / The person I've become / And I've been tryna fill all of this empty / But, fuck, I'm still so empty" He comes back to this parental subject yet again later when he sings "If I could break my DNA to pieces / Rid of all my demons / If I could cleanse my soul / Then I could fill the world with all my problems / But, shit, that wouldn't solve them / So, I'm left here alone" There was clearly some huge parental impact that has had some life changing impact on this guy. So "DNA" enslaves us with our "demons" and we realize you can't solve it. He also says: "The baggage in my heart is still so dark" (Baggage usually refers to what you get from parents that stick with you for life). It is for a very good reason that in the official music video, there are communications with "Dad" and with "Mom". They ("mom and dad") appear at the end of the video as well in support.

So if you can find a review that tackles this "parental" aspect of the song and son-father relationship, it would also be a great addition, because this is also a majour theme in the song as well. Modern Loneliness is not just about online, but family relations, depression and mental health as well. Even if quotations could not be found, in the "Synopsis" section, a convenient sentence or two could be added about the mom and dad connection while describing the video content. Develop 2-3 sentences to what you report "Towards the end, he starts to text back his friends and family and calls his parents back." which is conveniently there. But it merits some more elaboration.

Conclusion

That's about it Matthew. In conclusion, I must add this communication with you is sort of a tribute to the essence of the "Modern Loneliness" lyric about online communications. Because it effected me greatly. Then I realized your communication on my talk page was so relevant and a very close call to my understanding of the song. It struck a moment in me as it dawned on me what Lauv meant with this gem. I realized you reached me through the internet as a colleague editor, an unknown "Wikipedia friend" I know nothing about, but with clear compassion and resolve to make a contact through an edit I made. And in retrospect I am happy I made it or else all this "magic moment" wouldn't have been possible really, would it? So I wanted to respond so as not to fall to the trap and mistake of "Love my friends to death / But I never call and I never text 'em". We as editors fall into this easy trap and we don't respond and even if we do, it is with bitterness and aggressiveness, a condescending wry comment, or worse, we respond with a one liner let down sentence and just move on. But for me, a communication like yours is an opportunity to prove if you are "an editor friend from Wikipedia" and you really care, as I felt you did, you do deserve my time and effort and that's what I've done as you see. I've put great thought to a way of responding adequately to make an impact as well. Plus this song has effected me tremendously as you see, and now I realize the quality of the Wikipedia article was almost this one-man effort by you to present it in the best way to readers all over the world. It is a "quality product" already. I am sure Lauv fans appreciate what you have done here as well. Hope Lauv has had the time and also has checked this piece in Wikipedia. It is very possible, and if it is, it would be amazing. You deserve a signed copy of the single at least, plus a free ticket, an invitation when he is near your town. Finally a dedication to Filipino friend, who really cares: "Para Sa 'Yo" here by a young Philippines talent Juan Karlos Labajo . For you! werldwayd (talk) 06:47, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

@Werldwayd: Wow, I didn't expect a response like this. If I'm being honest, like you said, I definitely would have expected a one sentence or so response and that's it. When I saw the notification that you replied, I was amazed and was kind of happy to see really detailed feedback, and I just want to say thank you so much. When I looked at your page, I saw that you had 300k+ edits and thought, he might be a bit busy. But I really appreciate you actually taking the time to provide a lot of suggestions that I can definitely work on.
First off, you're right about the introduction. When I was writing the intro, I couldn't exactly come up with the right words, which is why that one sentence sounded sort of bland. I'll definitely take your suggestion on what the 2nd paragraph should look like. I'll add just a bit more info as well as I expand further into the article, if necessary. This is really my first "real" article that I've attempted to do, and I'm happy with the progress that I've made, and would love to make it better than it was before.
As for the appearances, I didn't even think of this part. It just slipped my mind, I guess. I never looked into Lauv's performances of the song, and didn't realize that there were quite a few notable appearances that he made on national TV. I'll make sure to add a new section focusing on that, as it's definitely a major part and could add even more detail to the article than I thought.
I had fun writing the critical reception section. It was interesting to see all the point-of-views of the reviewers. The reviewers add a lot of good commentary, and would definitely try to dig for more to expand the section. For the lyrics, I guess my mind may have slipped on the other meanings of the song. I guess I was just so focused on the "social media" part that I didn't bother to notice and expand on the relationship and other thoughts that he references in the lyrics. Going in deeper into the lyrics is something I will add for sure, and hopefully I'll be able to find more reviews that can support these meanings. And adding more to the music video section is probably a good idea. I was looking at other articles (for example, the one I mentioned earlier: If I Were A Boy) and they really went in-depth to capture more of the song's meaning. I love this and will incorporate these types of writing into this article.
Like I said earlier, I didn't expect a reply like this and I really, really appreciate it. You pointed out a lot of things that could definitely be fixed or added to make the article even better. I'm basically still new to the whole Wikipedia community; before this article, I have only made three small stubs and a start-class article. But when I remembered this song, I thought to myself—why doesn't this track have it's own page yet? It made many news articles and is one of Lauv's most important releases to date, even though like you said, it did not chart very well. What's surprising to me is it never even broke the Billboard Hot 100 chart, but that's alright I guess. What matter is the content of the song, not the success nor achievements. But anyway, this is why I decided to take the opportunity to attempt to write it.
Overall, I just want to say that your comments will make the article better than it ever was before. Unfortunately, I have an exam coming up in a few days, in which I have to focus on that for a bit. But rest assured, I will be doing more and more research on the song within the next few weeks. I really hope you can come back in some time to see the progress. As my first serious article, I want it to be the best it can possibly be and hopefully everything will go well.
Once you decide to take a look at his other songs, I know you won't be disappointed. Although I haven't gone through How I'm Feeling as much besides the 10 singles and a few songs here and there, I know it's all likely good and hopefully you'll enjoy them as well. His previous album, I Met You When I Was 18 (The Playlist) is definitely a great listen. Though most of the album is a bit emotional (with the exception of tracks 1, 2, 10, 12, and 13, which are all more upbeat), they are great songs to listen to. If you'd like, update me on that, it would be cool to see if you like his other tracks or not. But, of course, no rush and no obligation. Also, I never thought of Lauv himself possibly reading the article, but ever since one of my friends read my other article and pointed out that the artist could have possibly read it, it's weird but it makes sense. If he ever does see it, that would actually be really cool. By the way, that song you linked at the end was pretty good. I don't typically listen to much OPM but when I do, it's usually not bad.
I hope you have a great day in the midst of the current worldwide situation. BenevolentBeast (talk) 07:58, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
All the best for your exams. I have added added the cover according to this Apple page It looks awfully similar to the album cover. Perhaps it is not an actual cover and Apple is all wrong about it. But let's keep it in for now until the distributing company comes with a new cover design. If you are sure the cover is wrong though, take it off. Mind you in Europe some use this Cover in Netherlands, or in Cover in Belgium. Incidentally the page you created now has visits of between 50 and 70 views on average every day (particularly these last few days it has seen a sharp rise) (See updated visits per day) Here some Stats to make you appreciate your work. Almost 96% of the work is your text!
I have now added the Belgian chart peak on the table on the page by this edit. I'll keep an eye if there are more chartings in Europe. I think this will be growing with time.
You say the track has two videos—a visualizer and a music video. But with the two videos you mention there is a third "official video" published by Lauv on his own page "Modern Loneliness (acoustic) [Official Video]" (video here). So I think this needs a mentioned in the "Music Video" section as a third video. It has no backing vocals. Just him and the guitar.
Some sources you may have not used, but very relevant: MTV News, CLASH (an amazing source I must say and a precious interview), LaViasco (this goes into detail of each verse and contains good coverage of the son-father relationship), DustTalks (a great source for analysis of the lyrics - I am sure you will find a few ideas from here to cover lyrics) Summit (analysis from a Christian perspective) and so on... I could edit from these myself, but I'd rather leave them to your sensible editing. I want you to have this as a memorable magical edit page. I'll only make some nominal maintenance edits, but for development of text and content, it's yours. But exams first! This can wait. werldwayd (talk) 10:10, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Eurotrash (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Johnny Logan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:51, 17 May 2020 (UTC)


Nomination of Bitcoin (disambiguation) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bitcoin (disambiguation) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bitcoin (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jtbobwaysf (talk) 20:36, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

Enough with partisan massive edits on both sides

Our Malankara Church article is about the "historical Malankara church". But because of recent conflicts between the Malankara Orthodox Syrian Church and the Jacobite Syrian Christian Church, this article has become the battleground between editors biased towards this church or that church on both sides of the conflict. So we see these massive shifts in which what should be a more static "historical Wikipedia page" become so unrecognizable in the wink of an eye. So as if in a matter of few days we have a "new" historical fact of a new church. I mean what could have happened in a matter of few days to add or subtract from a well-grounded article this much. I assume a small paragraph at the end needs to tackle the conflict in a grounded manner, but the overall article should be left alone. I have had enough of this meddling with what should be a stable historical and reliable article. A committee of let's say three detached non-biased but knowledgeable editors should be assigned to which all suggested edits should be forwarded to. It would be good that these editors know a lot about the nuances and can pick what is a genuine proposed edit and what is a biased partisan edit and decide. Those who propose changes should have an editor name (so no anonymous editors) and they should have at least say 500 edits to prove they are genuinely interested in the welfare of the Wikipedia project and are not here for some one-subject partisan interest and no other contribution except fixation in this one subject. I hope this page and probably (for the next few months) the pages of the Malankara Orthodox Syrian Church and the Jacobite Syrian Christian Church are subject to stricter surveillance and higher requirements for being able to change them. werldwayd (talk) 23:52, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

Werldwayd, if/when you suspect sockpuppetry, we are handling that at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kkktpkirij. Elizium23 (talk) 23:59, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
No, I am not suggesting sockpuppetry at all. What I mean is that we have very much biased a sort of "activism editing" in which "my side is always right and the other side always wrong". Plus if an editor is only concerned and fixated with just one subject, he or she is not well-intentioned editor as all he wants from the Wikipedia project is this one page to be alligned to what he thinks it should be alligned to. In these turbulent times of a great historical church, one of the most ancient of the general Christian Church, if this church is passing through an internal conflict, why should an entire "historical Malankara Church page" be subject to such massive restructuring and editing? I know the article suffers from a very big concern that over the years, it has included very biased editors who jeopardized the overall neutrality. The role of my suggested three-member committee is to study the article, all its references, its present and earlier content, keep what is accurate and remove what is inaccurate and reinstate what was accurate earlier but had been removed by later edit. A sort of a truly encyclopedic solid article in a moraturium month let's say, and after that only nominal changes should be made only, as history is history after all, and not much new facts can arise with such an article. It's not that this is a new church that is rising. It was around many centuries ago. Then it stopped being and is taken over by a multitude of new churches. The Malankara Church page to my mind should be comprehensive, but static and solidly stable werldwayd (talk) 00:12, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
Whatever you suggest, sockpuppetry is very much a factor on these pages and has been for months. We've been blocking lots of socks and they are the source of much disruptive editing. We've also been using WP:RFPP to protect pages against newly-created socks, and that's been quite effective, along with new "partial blocks" where an IP range or username can be blocked from editing a specified number of specific pages. Elizium23 (talk) 00:14, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
Again, if sockpuppetry needs to be addressed here, all the power to you. But in essence sockpuppetry is not the real issue at the end. A sockpuppet can go to an anonymous internet cafe and edit. There is no proof he is the same guy. He can go to a friend's domicile somewhere else, create an editor name, or just ask his friend to do the desired edits.... It's sort of "war on drugs" or fighting global terrorism now.... The real issue, to my mind is the mindset of "partisan editing" or "activist editing". It's sort of a propaganda scheme or some "holy war". What I am talking is a mentality of why and how one should actually edit Wikipedia. Mind you it can be an editor who has never ever done a single edit in Wikipedia. He is an inexperienced newcomer and is for some valid reason involved as a member of one of these Malankara churches. I mean you search what interests you or involves you, right? But this newcomer is so incensed by our Malankara article, the first edit he makes is this massive change in the article. Every single detail is amended by him. Now this should stop. No anonymous editing should be allowed and let's say 500 edits in a multitude of subject before changing this one page and disappearing. All the rest should address their proposed changes to a committee and the latter tackles how important it is to make the change and how to make it. And first and foremost. All the earlier materials should be questioned and the article cleansed, including biased partisan references so that we have a solid reliable article. As much as I love Wikipedia, Malankara Church, Malankara Orthodox Syrian Church and the Jacobite Syrian Christian Church that we have are highly questionable and suspect and at best, one sided, and I would take every single paragraph I read in them with a pinch of salt. werldwayd (talk) 00:27, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
Good; as it is, page protection is in place now, and will expire in 9 hours. So let's be vigilant for disruptive editing in all its forms, and resubmit the article to WP:RFPP, and we'll get our wish that only autoconfirmed users may edit the page. Elizium23 (talk) 00:54, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
Well I've had my say. And I do appreciate you helpful comments here and your due diligence remarkable edits on the page. But what I know is that these articles have been subject to those one-sided edits for many years past, are still a battleground today and will remain so for many months and years to come. So temporary restrictions may help for a few days. But the problem persists and will return as soon as the restrictions expire. A more permanent upkeep is necessary and some dedicated editor. Pay them a nominal monthly salary if need be. Say 100 dollars a month for his precious time and knowledge... It's too much to handle for some dedicated editor being a sort of "guardian angel" or "redeeming saviour" for months and months and gets a lot of abuse and no pay and gets burnt out. Then he quits and we find a new unpaid dedicated editor who now goes to the same process before he gets burnt out as well. And the abuse on the page continues... So all the best to you. Really and honestly. But if we think of our temporary "a week or two" measures or discovering a sockpuppet here and there is such a great achievement... you need to know our "one month Wikipedia timeframe" is a "second" or two in Malankara Church time. This is a church of centuries for good reason. It has been going on if you believe their church history since St. Thomas, yeh, that Thomas who was one of the chosen twelve apostles of Jesus Christ, the Messiah, Son of God, the one who is expected to come in a great messianic event.... Yes this is the one St. Thomas who infamously didn't believe Jesus' (Messiah's) resurrection and demanded that Jesus appear to him and the rest so that he would put his finger on the hands of Jesus that showed the nail scars he suffered on the Cross... That Thomas that traveled to India, an unknown land, to establish this thing called Malankara Church we are talking about endlessly 1900 years on, give or take. The Malankara Church tradition is that he died their for his beloved Malankara Church that he established for the love of Jesus and mankind... I mean this subject is so timeless and engaging me and you have spent on this for a few hours of our precious time in one infamous Friday the 22nd of May 2020 in corona days, without finding a single other editor to intervene and give his or her opinion for a change... I mean this subject page is that engaging. But I can assure you from now that Wikipedia will disappear from the face of the Earth but Malankara Church and its continuing modern-day derivatives will go on and on and on long after we're gone in the ether. Let's see others address this issue though. I'll watch the page for sure but am moving on to other subjects... werldwayd (talk) 01:11, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:My-life-in-porn-Bobby-Blake.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:My-life-in-porn-Bobby-Blake.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:48, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Burrard, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Harry Burrard and George Burrard (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:38, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Alexandre Tarta concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Alexandre Tarta, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:35, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 May 2020

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:06, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

File:I-Am-A-Gummy-Bear-The-Gummy-Bear-Song.jpg

Can I use this picture on page of russian Wikipedia "Гуммибер"? Владимир Меланхолин (talk) 09:24, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

Harris J

Hello dear friend. I hope you are fine. You have added a lot of content to this page, but in my best judgement the sources you add for some (other content is unreferenced) is weak or unreliable. If you disagree we can discuss the edits on the talk page. I have made an edit summary but please ping me if you’d like to discuss on my own talk page. I’m sure you can improve the quality of the sources. All the best, George Custer's Sabre (talk) 09:32, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

File:NewYorkTimesFrontPage-15Nov2012.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:NewYorkTimesFrontPage-15Nov2012.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. -- Marchjuly (talk) 09:34, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Survivor: Live from Harding Prison, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages CCM and Essential Records (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:44, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mukarram Talabani

Notice

The article Mukarram Talabani has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. TheImaCow (talk) 08:55, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Gétaz (disambiguation)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Gétaz (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

  • disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
  • disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
  • is a redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 06:59, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Call (2002 film)

Notice

The article The Call (2002 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film with no independent, verifiable reviews.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 16:01, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Call (2002 film)

Notice

The article The Call (2002 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film with no independent, verifiable reviews.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 16:01, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Mongolian-National-Democratic-Party-2005.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mongolian-National-Democratic-Party-2005.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:29, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Anomie (Stephen Simmonds album)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Anomie (Stephen Simmonds album) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article does not exist or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Majash2020 (talk) 22:39, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Nexus-music.gif

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Nexus-music.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:35, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Anomie (Stephen Simmonds album) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anomie (Stephen Simmonds album) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anomie (Stephen Simmonds album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Majash2020 (talk) 00:46, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 June 2020

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:54, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Alexandre Tarta

Hello, Werldwayd. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Alexandre Tarta".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 08:39, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

File:NewYorkTimesFrontPage-15Nov2012.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:NewYorkTimesFrontPage-15Nov2012.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 2 July 2020 (UTC)


Proposed deletion of Jeanene Fox

Notice

The article Jeanene Fox has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable BLP

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 12:33, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Anomie-album-by-stephen-simmonds.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Anomie-album-by-stephen-simmonds.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:24, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Anomie-album-by-stephen-simmonds.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Anomie-album-by-stephen-simmonds.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:24, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of International College of Excellence

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on International College of Excellence requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

  • disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
  • disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
  • is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Metropolitan90 (talk) 22:16, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Khalil-and-majnun.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Khalil-and-majnun.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:39, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Arev-arabic.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Arev-arabic.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 2 August 2020

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:26, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

Requesting article expansion help

Hi,

Recently initiated Draft:Yasmine Mohammed as stub article. Pl. do have a look at the article and if interests you then join in expanding the same with suitable references.

Thanks and regards.

Bookku (talk) 08:51, 8 August 2020 (UTC)


Disambiguation link notification for August 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Beste Zangers, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Jan Keizer and Ben Saunders.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:28, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Leto (rapper), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Niska.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:38, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Node (singer)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Node (singer) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://krposts.com/block/ycqf5J44SWgTvMeO1lQ-2w. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Onel5969 TT me 14:30, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 August 2020

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:33, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Washington Post front page.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Washington Post front page.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mookie's Law

Notice

The article Mookie's Law has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable short film, nothing found in a WP:BEFORE search to help it pass WP:NFILM. Tagged for notability for over a year.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 21:31, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:JoongAng-Ilbo.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:JoongAng-Ilbo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:52, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Mookies-law-short.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mookies-law-short.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:50, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

Jubël (duo)

Hey Werldwayd. Would you be willing to expand Jubël (duo) into an article? I was just notified that this and Jubël (band) have been nominated for deletion, and I think it's pointless as the band have had more entries in Europe than just their cover of "Dancing in the Moonlight". Thanks. Ss112 15:33, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for the message. I am happy you contacted me after all this time. I appreciated you great contributions and chart updates. And I appreciate your edits from time to time. But no rush. A person like you could have a chart website on your own. You were visiting all these chart pages and you probably know a lot about international music. I will definitly try to come up with an article for Jubël as well in a couple of days I hope. I do really believe Wikipedia is not doing enough to highlight international music. Yes we have a lot, but we miss a lot as well. werldwayd (talk) 15:46, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for the well wishes you left on my talk page a few months back and here now. I've semi-returned to editing, but also remain semi-retired. I haven't gotten back into doing chart updates, and I don't particularly wish to or see myself doing so. There are other users covering most of that now, and I'm fine with that freeing up most of the time I used to dedicate to doing them, although I do agree with your point that Wikipedia's coverage is lacking on international non-English music. Anyway, thanks if you can get around to expanding the article. Ss112 16:15, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Thanks User talk:Ss112. After your great words, I am even more motivated to at least launch a page for Jubël. I am also having this "Wikipedia fatigue" by now and don't edit that much. I am happy you keep at least a token link with Wikipedia. Plus that your tremendous input for years to Wikipedia Music was legendary and much appreciated. I can't forget that. I used to keep up just the music number ones pages and it was so much work. But you were updating all the new entries and the new peaks of all the songs and with much better referencing than I could ever do. That was awesome. So I quit even doing the number ones. In any case, there are times we have to set our priorities and if necessary call quits here. The whole Wikipedia system is built on voluntary efforts of people who have this idealistic vision that they are contributing meaningfully to a greater project and that they are appreciated by many. Then some stupid discussion and so much insult makes us realise that our sacrifices were not considered at all by other trigger-happy colleagues and administrators. I am surprised how people like me just continue to donate our times this way. Me I almost never take part in discussions because of their toxic atmosphere. I make one token effort to save an article and if I get a tit for tat or firey answer, I just quit. They can delete it for all I care. And move on to some other article myself. No one article or position is worth the risk. I just mind my business and almost totally ignore discussing after a token intervention. Still thanks to you. By the way, I love Jubël. I find them fascinating. werldwayd (talk) 16:31, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

Jubël - Dancing in the Moonlight

Hello Werldwayd

I wanted to thank you for your contributions to the Jubël version of Dancing in the moonlight. I thought I would let you know that I have added some more charts and a certifications table (although it has displayed using the American MDY date format whereas the chart table uses the DMY date format, I’m not sure why this is?)

Thanks again, TF0771 (talk) 12:08, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

The reason for using DMY was because Jubël is a Swedish act and in Sweden they use DMY. But since the great majority of the page is in MDY, go ahead, you have my go ahead to convert all of the ones appearing as DMY to MDY for consistency in the whole article. werldwayd (talk) 19:32, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for your response, I will do this now. TF0771 (talk) 20:54, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:JoongAng-Ilbo.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:JoongAng-Ilbo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:36, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Banana (disambiguation), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shaggy.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 September 2020

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:48, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 September 2020

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:54, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

Can you make an article for the new Kane Brown EP?

The new Kane Brown EP has two pretty huge hits, with "Cool Again" and "Be Like That". I was wondering if you could make an article for it. 2001:558:6012:50:7902:D51F:B9F7:9985 (talk) 02:29, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shot in the Dark (song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shot in the Dark.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:37, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

"Liraz" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Liraz. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 9#Liraz until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 18:53, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Daniel Balavoine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Starmania.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

Süßer die Glocken nie klingen

You created the redirect for Süßer die Glocken nie klingen to "the writer", but it's the wrong person. Did you read that article? Just wondering ... - No need to change, and the correct one has no article, - I'll substitute by an article about the song tomorrow. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:45, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

Thanks Gerda Arendt. Well I was depending on the List of carols under German. Now as a rectifying move, I have redirected like this. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Christmas_carols#German which is our page List of Christmas#German which is the best move for now. It explains as "The Bells Never Sound Sweeter" / Traditional / Wilhelm Kritzinger .... So you see my obvious confusion with Friedrich Wilhelm Kritzinger. In this latter article it says his father was a Christian pastor. Is it actually his father we are talking about? In any case, now the forward is to the Christmas carols page, so accurate. Hopefully some fellow editor will use this as an incentive to create a full article for this popular Christmas song werldwayd (talk) 21:33, 21 October 2020 (UTC) werldwayd (talk) 22:43, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Thanks. Looking forward for a full article on this from you. Don't forget also the language versions and covers by well known artists recording it. WE thankfully have a German article about it already in Wikipedia in addition to Spanish, Italian and Polish. So an English article will fill a great need for coverage of a wonderful song. werldwayd (talk) 00:04, 22 October 2020 (UTC) werldwayd (talk) 00:08, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:NewYorkTimesFrontPage-15Nov2012.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:NewYorkTimesFrontPage-15Nov2012.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:43, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

Athletico SC

Hi, I think the disambig page should be merged with Atletico into one page, with the various Athletico SC's and Atlético's redirecting to the same page. Nehme1499 (talk) 15:44, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for suggesting. But Atletico had just two items whereas I had collected more than10-12 items and I thought the English Athletico would be better for English Wikipedia. But now that most of the items I have added are Atlético, I have taken your suggestion and moved them there. werldwayd (talk) 17:06, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Perfect, thanks! Nehme1499 (talk) 21:07, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
God bless. والله كنت نور ونعمة عليّي werldwayd (talk) 21:12, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Beach basketball for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Beach basketball is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beach basketball until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Deadbeef 04:23, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Atlético, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nacional Atlético Clube.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:35, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

Atlético F.C.

Hello. I've attempted to fix the links to dabs resulting from the Atlético F.C. move, but it's a complex web of redirects and renamings and I may have made mistakes. Please can you check my work? Thanks, Certes (talk) 11:18, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

I appreciate so much your work Certes and thank God for DisamAssist without which this would have been an impossible task. It was wrong from the outset to establish Atletico FC for one specific club, even if it was called Atlético Fútbol Club as you realize Atletico FC applies to hundreds of teams. So I don't know why that one team was chosen for this. It had to be changed to Atlético FC Cali or whatever. Plus there were so many links as Dépor F.C.. Also Atlético Juventud is also a common generic name of many clubs, so I had to change that specific one to Atlético Juventud Girardot. There are many Atlético Juventuds. Atletico SC was also a very common name, so why assign it to some obscure Lebanese women's team in a small town. All these generic names needed to be corrected. I am so sad this caused so many wrong links in Wikipedia that needed fixing, but now you have done an admirable job for which I am forever thankful. I am checking the corrections one by one and they look fine. werldwayd (talk) 11:39, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
You're right that there are other clubs called Atlético Juventud, such as Juventud de Las Piedras, Juventud Unida Universitario and Juventud de Pergamino. I retargeted that redirect to Atlético Juventud Girardot, but perhaps it should be a {{R from ambiguous term}} or even a new dab and its incoming links changed. My other concern was that some links to Athletico SC (Lebanon) clearly refer to men's football. I'm going to assume that the "homonymous sports academy" also had a male team not mentioned in the article; it's no worse than linking Atlético Cali from 2019 Colombian Women's Football League. Certes (talk) 12:03, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:JoongAng-Ilbo.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:JoongAng-Ilbo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:35, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

Tove Lo

Thanks for thanking me for starting the page. But mine was a modest start, a very very modest for the page when she had just one or two hits. I heard them and I liked them. So I rushed creating the page. I was terrified though some colleague would come swiftly and suggest deleting it for lack of notability, lack of references etc. But it stayed strangely enough and now look at the page! Yes I was so excited for an unknown Swedish singer, but never expected it would blossom into this. So impressive. I am though still with the small guy as always. I always have that fear they will delete a page I really cared for... So despite all my edits, I still fear such a treatment. But when a page gets real big, you won't see me edit in a page like Tove Lo anymore. She is so big now, my effort is better used somewhere else. At the time I was the one. The only one practically. Now there are hundreds of volunteers... but not me. Still thanks anyway. You made my day and made me reminisce the days when my service was needed. This is my two cents for fellow editors. That they err to the side of inclusiveness. Someone somewhere needs our input. Perhaps the artist himself or herself in his/her greatest time of need for being acknowledged. When they get real big eventually, who needs an editor like me anyway. werldwayd (talk) 00:43, 29 October 2020 (UTC) werldwayd (talk) 00:47, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

Your reply made me smile during the entire time I was reading your comment @Werldwayd:, Lo's music means a lot to me and I certainly dose to you too! I related completely when you talked about getting a page deleted. I had the same fear after my first page, that someone would suggest it getting deleted because of some strange reason, but no, it stayed! My very first article/draft/sandbox wasn't so lucky though... when I received the "welcome to the TeaHouse" notification, my day would be completely ruined. You were the one to start Lo's page and you built the foundation for that article, now people are building the rest, and look at it now! It's now a Wikipedia:Good article! Thank you for creating the article when you did, and for your work on this wonderful piece of art! Thank you so much! Much love,--Los Perros pueden Cocinar (talk) 02:05, 29 October 2020 (UTC) <3

Thanks again. When you have a problem with editing or a page you proposed is being nominated for deletion, I would love to help if possible. Drop a line on my talk page. You have to restore at least a minimum user page as well now deleted. Nothing elaborate mind you. Just what areas you love editing, what are your priorities editing and how they can contact you. It shouln't be a red link. Just 3-4 lines will do. Meanwhile all the best. It was a pleasure. werldwayd (talk) 07:44, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

Will do! I'll let you know if I need help! Thanks for the proposal, and thanks for the page! --Los Perros pueden Cocinar (talk) 14:01, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

UFO Yepha

Hi, they didn't have an & in their name. While you're at it, you can link Yepha which you made later on. TherasTaneel (talk) 21:54, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for your note. I have fixed the name and linked to Yepha as well. Thanks again werldwayd (talk) 22:40, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

Reverted move

Hi, just to let you know I've reverted your move of Illustrated Daily News, given it was never formally named the Los Angeles Daily News. It might be worth a talk page discussion if you intend to move FAs in future, since they are generally watched and their names have been the source of discussion, as indeed this was at the FAC. All the best.--Wehwalt (talk) 12:37, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The-Times-5-June-2013.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The-Times-5-June-2013.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:44, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 1

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Esporte Clube Juventude
added a link pointing to Juventud
Juventude Sport Clube
added a link pointing to Juventud
Los Angeles Herald
added a link pointing to Los Angeles Express
Los Angeles Herald-Express
added a link pointing to Los Angeles Express
TeenStar
added a link pointing to Hayes

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:29, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 1 November 2020

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:53, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Baselios-Paulose-II.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Baselios-Paulose-II.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement of http://www.syriacchristianity.info/MorBaseliosPauloseII/Photos.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Elizium23 (talk) 08:00, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

This may be considered a fair use since it pertains to a deceased person and is a very standard historical photo. For notable dead persons, it may be impossible to provide non copyright photos. So we may use a widely used photo already in circulation on many other sites and print publications. Such photos are considered typical photos for general use. werldwayd (talk) 09:37, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Los Angeles Herald, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Los Angeles Express.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 8 November 2020 (UTC)


Orphaned non-free image File:Message (AIDES album - cover art).jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Message (AIDES album - cover art).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:40, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Washington-Times-Herald-Washington-Indiana.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Washington-Times-Herald-Washington-Indiana.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:00, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Firestone-Kygo-featuring-Conrad.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Firestone-Kygo-featuring-Conrad.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Icekiid

Hello, Werldwayd. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Icekiid".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:33, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

The Galleon moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, The Galleon, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. — Amkgp 💬 14:02, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Novaya-Gazeta-cover.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Novaya-Gazeta-cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:48, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 November 2020

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:47, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of EyeMan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article EyeMan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EyeMan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Praxidicae (talk) 14:04, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

George Khoury (actor) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, George Khoury (actor), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jmertel23 (talk) 19:53, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

Edit summaries

Hello. I notice that a series of edits you made at Los Angeles Herald-Express did not contain Edit summaries. As you know, these few words for each change are very helpful to other editors. Yours, BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 00:24, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Playgirl-issue-one.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Playgirl-issue-one.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:31, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

File:Hallelujah-norway-single.jpg

Hey there. I placed the PROD tag on File:Hallelujah-norway-single.jpg. You have seven days to contest/remove the PROD tag. Once removed, I won't be able to reinsert the tag; there is WP:FFD. If left uncontested, the image will be then deleted. --George Ho (talk) 04:38, 18 December 2020 (UTC)


Nomination of List of Caucasian Albanian catholicoi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Caucasian Albanian catholicoi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

The Signpost: 28 December 2020

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:26, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vaï, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Laval.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:30, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Werldwayd/Archive12_(2020)&oldid=1211820531"