User talk:Werldwayd/Archive2 (2008-2009)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


This is an archive of Werldwayd talk messages. My current talk page is here: User talk:Werldwayd. Please leave messages only on that page.

For archived talk pages of earlier messages, please refer to:



Welcome note

Welcome!

Hello, Werldwayd, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions, especially those to the Paul Guiragossian article.

You might like to read these pages, which helped me when I was starting:

Wikipedia can be kind of crazy, so if you need help, don't hesitate to ask. Check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} in a new section on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome, and I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!

« D. Trebbien (talk) 20:19, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Notability of Streetwize (jazz band)

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Streetwize (jazz band), by Danielarrow, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Streetwize (jazz band) seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Streetwize (jazz band), please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Streetwize (jazz band) itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 17:34, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Stateside (band)

A tag has been placed on Stateside (band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Excirial (Talk,Contribs) 20:31, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Lee Mulhern

I have nominated Lee Mulhern, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lee Mulhern. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Ian¹³/t 21:02, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Lee Mulhern

A tag has been placed on Lee Mulhern requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 21:10, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

Statewide

Please read WP:MUSIC and tell me how you think Statewide meets the notability guidelines for bands and musicians. Just saying "They have appeared in a number of events live (UK, Ireland, Europe) and an album is in the making." and including a video link isn't enough. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 21:11, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Desert Heat (band)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Desert Heat (band), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. tomasz. 17:25, 16 August 2008 (UTC)

re: "incomplete list"

I'm not sure where you intended to post this comment but is does not appear to be at all relevant to the template page where you posted it. I have reverted that edit in the hope that you can find the correct page. Thanks. Rossami (talk) 04:13, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

  • Thank you for your assistance. I have reposted it on the proper talk section of the article actually werldwayd (talk) 05:07, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Armenians in Italy

Thanks for your work on the page Armenians in Italy. Dzhugashvili (talk) 11:19, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

Demographics of Nagorno-Karabakh

Hi. Re this article you split out, surely it would be better titled "Demographics of the Nagorno-Karabakh Republic", or have I misunderstood what it's supposed to be about ? CultureDrone (talk) 14:40, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

  • You are absolutely right. These are current data of population of the Nagorno-Karabakh Republic, not the region of Nagorno-Karabakh. I have implemented the change exactly as you suggested werldwayd (talk) 08:14, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

Ben Addelman

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Ben Addelman, and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: Samir Mallal. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:45, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Arev Armenian Folk Ensemble

I have nominated Arev Armenian Folk Ensemble, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arev Armenian Folk Ensemble. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Lәo(βǃʘʘɱ) 04:34, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

January 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Manu Militari has been reverted.

Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): \bmyspace\.com (links: http://www.myspace.com/manumilitari).

If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 10:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Great work


The Barnstar of High Culture
For your contributions to Wikipedia's Canadian film-related articles.Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:33, 11 March 2009 (UTC)|}


Armenian Barnstar of National Merit
User:Werldwayd is hereby awarded the Armenian Barnstar of National Merit for all the hard and tireless work he has done to improve the coverage of Armenian related articles. Keep up the great work!
this WikiAward was given to Werldwayd by --VartanM (talk) 11:21, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Werldwayd. You have new messages at Camaron's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--GedUK  08:54, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Imposs

A tag has been placed on Imposs requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. RadioFan2 (talk) 01:29, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Unconstructive

How are my contributions unconstructive?Guitarmasta666 (talk) 14:13, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Phil Vassar

Please don't demolish the article's intro. An intro is supposed to be more than two sentences long. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Many otters • One hammer • HELP) 18:12, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Kristyan Ferrer

A tag has been placed on Kristyan Ferrer requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. mhking (talk) 04:42, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Kristyan Ferrer

I have nominated Kristyan Ferrer, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kristyan Ferrer. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. mhking (talk) 12:16, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

That's fair enough. I'll certainly abide by what the concensus decides on the article. (cheerfully so!) --mhking (talk) 15:35, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

Hagop Kassarjian

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Hagop Kassarjian. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:12, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

Cheb Mami

Hey, thanks for cleaning up and adding to the Cheb Mami article, it looks great!Fuzbaby (talk) 16:35, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Courtesy notification

An article you have edited, Nabil Abou-Harb, is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nabil Abou-Harb (2nd nomination). MichaelQSchmidt (talk) 19:56, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

Might you consider adding the award and cite to the article? And what do you think about removing the "Commercials" sectiion entirely, as it does not seem useful to the overall notability... unless one of them has won an award. MichaelQSchmidt (talk) 21:15, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

Steven Hilliard Stern

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Steven Hilliard Stern. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:11, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

Categories

Thanks for your recent edits. FYI, we usually do not tag articles into parent categories when they are already within subcategories. For example, you've added Category:LGBT-related films to many articles already within Category:American LGBT-related films or similar subcategories, which is unnecessary and redundant, and actually deprecated to keep parent categories uncluttered. Thanks.— TAnthonyTalk 20:56, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

Blaine Larsen

You can't use a CD cover in {{Infobox musical artist}}. It generally has to be a free image, especially if it's a living person. Non-free images are only acceptable in biographical infoboxes if it's a deceased person (see Dan Seals) or disestablished band (see McBride & the Ride). Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 21:21, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

Adam Lambert straw poll on including/removing "Order #" and "Results" columns from the performances section

Hi, this may seem rather trivial but I'm trying to gauge community consensus on including or removing "Order #" and "Results" columns from the performances section on the Adam Lambert article which you have been in some way recently involved. The poll is here. Your time is appreciated. -- Banjeboi 21:40, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

Heidi Hartmann

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Heidi Hartmann, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.iwpr.org/About/staff.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 05:18, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Naked Rugby League

I have nominated Naked Rugby League, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naked Rugby League. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Mattinbgn\talk 03:54, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

re:Illinois high school boys basketball championship

Greetings Werldwayd!

I noticed that you removed Category:Basketball tag from this article. It certainly seems if was removed by an editor who knows what they are doing. could you explain to me why this article does not belong in this category? I ask so that I may avoid doing such things in the future. Any help would be appreciated. LonelyBeacon (talk) 01:17, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

I have responded to you on your own talk page werldwayd (talk) 06:05, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
Werldwayd,
I greatly appreciate your explanation. Not being affiliated with the basketball project that you are, I certainly did not have the background to make that assessment the way you could. You have my word that I will certainly not re-add it, and should I come across similar articles in the future, I will not add the category there.
Just for the record ... this particular tournament is not a conference tournament, and there are not hundreds like it in the United States. The tournament involves in excess of 500 teams, with less than 50 states holding full state championships like this (some states only crown regional champions instead of state champions). In the absence of a national tournament, this is generally the highest team honor American teams can achieve. I doubt that makes a difference here (I'm more into school related articles than basketball, so I have no strong feelings on this). Continued luck in your editing! LonelyBeacon (talk) 16:01, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Basketball Wales

Hi Werldwayd, please let me know your reason for removing [[Category:Basketball|Wales]] from Basketball Wales. I only ask as you didn't include an edit summary. Depending on your response, I may have to make some changes to categories in similar articles I've created. Cheers, Daicaregos (talk) 07:34, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

I have responded to you on your talk page werldwayd (talk) 07:52, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
Hi again, Thank you for your reply. I note that you have added [[Category:Basketball in Wales]] to Basketball in Wales. Thank you for doing that. May I suggest that you include an Edit summary when making changes to articles, as it helps everyone to understand what has been changed, and why. Do you have any reason to inform me that "4-5 players from college had been categorized under the category of Category:Basketball and I removed those too, for these 4-5 basketball players were so minimal to basketball they cannot be mentioned either. If Jordan or Bird or Magic Johnson are not categorized there, can a player named Chavis Holmes or Kirk Walters ...". I have never heard of them, nor understand why you would wish to discuss them with me. Were they part of a copy and paste that do not relate to my query. Please let me know if you want me to do anything about it/them. Best, Daicaregos (talk) 08:12, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Ankur Vikal

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Ankur Vikal. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Index of Gibraltar-related articles

I have nominated Index of Gibraltar-related articles, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Index of Gibraltar-related articles. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 21:51, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Tangram (book)

The article Tangram (book) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not appear to be notable

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cybercobra (talk) 07:27, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Cedar Revolution

A tag has been placed on Cedar Revolution, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

some of what it says is biased!

You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. MilesM11 (talk) 12:48, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Index of Lebanon-related articles

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Index of Lebanon-related articles. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Index of Lebanon-related articles. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:18, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Boy (2009 film)

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Boy (2009 film). We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boy (2009 film). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:17, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Bernd Dittrich

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Bernd Dittrich. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bernd Dittrich. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:08, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

Naím Thomas

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Naím Thomas. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Nicholas McAnulty

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Nicholas McAnulty. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicholas McAnulty. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:16, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

December 2009

  1. Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added such as to the page Bass Odyssey do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.  
    Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://www.myspace.com/bassodysseymusic (matching the regex rule \bmyspace\.com).
    If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 06:47, 11 December 2009 (UTC)


Stacey Solomon

Per "Redirect as there is concensus that non of the participants is notable" - I am not sure that there is that consensus. The opinion at Talk:List_of_The_X_Factor_finalists_(UK_series_6)#Joe_McElderry_2 seems to be (albeit sometimes grudgingly) that WP:MUSIC #9 applies to the top 3 finalists. Given that the independent article says nothing other than what is already at List_of_The_X_Factor_finalists_(UK_series_6) / The X Factor (UK series 6)‎ I personally cannot see justification for a separate article, but I don't know it can be argued against on the basis you did. I42 (talk) 19:19, 13 December 2009 (UTC)


Jon and Tracy Morter

I've no problem with you mentioning Jon and Tracy Morter in the body of the article Killing in the Name it is just that the intro should summarize the article. I understand it is difficult to resist adding news details to the summary but we need to remember the article is all about the song by Rage Against the Machine and focus on that. (The link will probably have to go. I'd be surprised if the Jon and Tracy Morter article survives, the kind of no fun editors I've encountered wouldn't let that article last days. Most likely it will end up as a redirect back to Killing in the Name -- Horkana (talk) 02:35, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for your sympathetic comment. I just cannot reinstate an entry over and over and I am of the rule of three-times reedits and refrain from that. I just hope some other colleague could pitch in with an entry for them if necessary. werldwayd (talk) 02:56, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of 7th Heaven (band)

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is 7th Heaven (band). We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/7th Heaven (band) (2nd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:09, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

NPOV

I've partially reverted some of your changes to Abdulkareem Khadr, you have to be careful not to remove sourced information about him - and comments like this border on POV - you are rephrasing the innocent meeting of a 10-year old child with a man who would later become notorious as Osama bin Laden's #2...as "he even met with al-Qaeda leader..." - let's not pretend a 10-year old is exercising choice in who he does and doesn't meet. Sherurcij (speaker for the dead) 04:18, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

Since I'm always ready to bitch when somebody makes an article worse or does an edit I consider unconstructive, I consider it only fair that I should now be obliged to come and thank you for the wikifying and linking to other articles you've done. (Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, etc) Good work on that front! However, I do think there's a certain POV inadvertantly created when you give a Canadian citizen born in Canada who speaks flawless English and was given an English name...and you put the name in Arabic in brackets as though that's the "real" name. He was named "Omar" not "عمر", etc. We don't do the same for Omar Epps for example. Also the fact their grandfather lived in Egypt is irrelevant to their introductions, per Wikipedia:NAMES#Opening_paragraph - "Ethnicity or sexuality should generally not be emphasized in the opening unless it is relevant to the subject's notability. Similarly, previous nationalities and/or the country of birth should not be mentioned in the opening sentence unless they are relevant to the subject's notability." - the fact he is "Canadian" is relevant, the fact his background heritage is Egyptian has never played a role in his notability. Sherurcij (speaker for the dead) 04:56, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
Actually Omar Epps is not an Arab, thus "Omar" as in Omar Epps is markedly different from Omar as in Omar Khadr. The "O" in Omar Epps is the Latin letter O whereas the "O" in Omar Khadr is the Arabic letter "ayin". I would be very surprosed for example that they called him the Americanised Omar when naming him, but rather the Arabic عمر with a "ayn". I am sure this is true inside their family as well. Withouth Arabic, not only is his personal name mispronounced, but his family name as well. The Canadians continue caling him Kadr or Qadr, whereas his name is definitly not an Englsh K but an Arabic [[Ḫāʾ] of KHA . The Arabic reproduction helps in correct pronunciation of his mispronounced name AND family name. Thus is a huge addition to correct pronunciation werldwayd (talk) 05:08, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
As far as ethnicity is concerned, an ordinary Canadian would not have been intersted at all in the time that the Khadrs were in Pakistan and Afghansitan. Believe it or not, their Arab ethnicity might have been one of the primary considerations because al Qaeda leadership is almost totally an Arab orgnaisation. All their announcements are in Arabic and its sympathizers mainly of the Arab World. So the Khadrs being Arab Muslims was a primary reason for their notability actually. werldwayd (talk) 05:19, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
Only to those who speak Arabic, less than 1% of readers I'm sure, to the other 99% it gives the illusion he's somehow "less" Canadian and has a "secret foreign name", that he's really named عمر and not Omar. If you're concerned about pronunciation, I'd suggestion appending Wikipedia:IPA for Arabic to the Khadr family article (though I doubt the individual biographies need it) instead. Per your final paragraph, it makes no sense and borders on extreme POVism - what language al-Qaeda releases its statements in is absolutely irrelevant to the spelling/appearance of the name of Canadians who followed their father overseas where he was alleged to have interacted with AQ. Sherurcij (speaker for the dead) 05:21, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
Again we should not just be "worried" how general readers will perceive a certain presentation. Simply because you have a foreign sounding name doesn't "make you a lesser Canadian". That's preposterous. Canada is a multicultural country wth many ethnicities. Canada also encourages people to be open about their language and ethnicity and not hide it behind some "sanitized" English sounding name. Perceptions in minds of readers is not something we control or base our editing decisions on. werldwayd (talk) 05:27, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
As a direct result of our conversation, now Omar Khadr has also an Arabic page [1] werldwayd (talk) 06:24, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Coffey Anderson

Werldwayd, do you have a reason for this? Drmies (talk) 02:36, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

Well, Before, the article had good sections and was well-divided. After the re-edits, what happened was that all the text came in the intro, with no subsections, then every album went on to have a multiple subsection for a discography that usually should be just that, a listing of albums. It didn't look right to have no sections for bio, then to have four sub-sections for every release. I also reasoned in the edit explanation "Albums names in bold rather than separate sub-sections". Usually discography sections do not even contain tracklists anyhow. In this case, Anderson would have, just like every other artist, four lines (names of albums) and years, that's all... I think the way it looks now, is that the discography looks more like one entity as is the case with all other artists. werldwayd (talk) 03:24, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for your response. Drmies (talk) 05:37, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Werldwayd/Archive2_(2008-2009)&oldid=1164391566"