User talk:West Virginian/Archive 23

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Wikipedia ad for Wikipedia:TULSA
Wikipedia adsfile info – show another – #161
My user talk page: September 2015–October 2015


Archive 20 Archive 21 Archive 22 Archive 23 Archive 24 Archive 25 → Archive 30

Joseph Sprigg (attorney general)

Hello, WV! I've just finished reading and copy-editing Joseph Sprigg (attorney general). I have a few questions and concerns:

1) In the section Joseph Sprigg (attorney general)#Early life and family, in the bulleted list of siblings, it looks as if the two columns are unnecessarily far apart. (a) Can you indent the left-hand column a bit? and (b) Can you bring the right-hand column a little closer to the left-hand column?

  • Corinne, the column formatting was being disagreeable so I went ahead and worked the columns back into the prose. Let me know if this works! -- West Virginian (talk) 07:47, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

2) The last sentence in the sub-section "West Virginia" of the section Joseph Sprigg (attorney general)#Law and political careers (right before "Maryland") is the following:

  • Following his election in 1888, Sprigg was selected as part of West Virginia's attending delegation to the inauguration of President Benjamin Harrison.

In this sentence, the possessive adjective "his" in "Following his election" is ambiguous. It's not clear whether this refers to Fleming or Sprigg.

  • Corinne, I've changed this to "Sprigg's election" to clarify this. Thanks for the catch! -- West Virginian (talk) 07:47, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

3) The second sentence in the third paragraph in the "Maryland" sub-section of the section Joseph Sprigg (attorney general)#Law and political careers is the following:

  • The league was formed in December 1899 for the purpose of cleaning up the pollution of the North Branch Potomac River, Cumberland's main public water source, following an acquittal of the West Virginia Pulp and Paper Company, which was blamed for the majority of the river's pollution.

I think to mention an "acquittal" of the company with no further explanation adds some unnecessary confusion. Even if you add just a brief explanatory phrase such as "an acquittal in a suit that had been brought against the company by X regarding the water pollution", that would help. If you don't want to add anything, you might consider deleting "following an acquittal". Just a thought.

  • Corinne, I've removed the mention of the acquittal and made that one sentences two separate sentences. Let me know if this works. Thanks! -- West Virginian (talk) 07:47, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

4) In the References section, you've got this statement:

  • Sprigg was sometimes erroneously named as "Spriggs".

"Named as" is not the phrase that is usually used. Ordinarily, it would be:

  • Sprigg was sometimes erroneously named "Spriggs". or
  • Sprigg was sometimes erroneously referred to as "Spriggs".

You'll see that I re-arranged a few sentences, and deleted some words. As always, feel free to undo or modify those changes. Corinne (talk) 01:16, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

  • Once again Corinne, thank you for a truly outstanding copyedit. Your edits have greatly improved this article! -- West Virginian (talk) 07:47, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
I'm glad to be of help. I enjoy learning about people in American history whom I had never heard of before. May I make a suggestion? I know your pings are a real courtesy, but every time you write {{u|Corinne}}, I get a separate notification, and since the notifications occur at about the same time, and are directing me to the same discussion, I don't think they are all necessary, do you? What do you think about waiting until you are writing your last reply to my various concerns to ping me? When I get to the discussion, I will read all your replies in that section. It would save you time and effort, and I'll see all your replies anyway. If you wish to ping me on an individual reply, please feel free to do so. Corinne (talk) 15:15, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
Corinne, I'll keep that in mind. -- West Virginian (talk) 16:59, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
I hope you were not offended by my suggestion. Corinne (talk) 00:41, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
Corinne, Not at all. I just took note. Thanks! -- West Virginian (talk) 11:24, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
I noticed two more things:

1) Twice, once in the lead and once in the "West Virginia" section of Joseph Sprigg (attorney general)#Law and political careers, you use the word "multiple"– "multiple terms". The use of "multiple" is becoming more common, but it isn't the best writing. It would be better to use a word such as "several", "many", or "numerous", or the phrase "a number of".

2) In the last paragraph in the "West Virginia" section of Joseph Sprigg (attorney general)#Law and political careers, you might want to give some thought to the order of sentences. You'll recall that you just changed "his election" to "Sprigg's election". Since the word "election" was just used in the previous sentence to refer to Fleming's election, this switch is slightly confusing, or jarring. Also, I notice that you have "following X" twice in the second half of that paragraph. I'm wondering whether you'd consider moving that last sentence earlier, perhaps just after that first "Following" sentence; it is just one more thing he did while in office. (You could, if you haven't already, put all of these things in precise chronological order according to when he did them, but if they are already in that order, it isn't making sense as far as paragraph organization, and if you're not going to give dates, chronological order is not really necessary.) I may be wrong, but the affair with the investigation of the other election seems the least important of all the things that are mentioned, so perhaps could go last. Corinne (talk) 15:34, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Hebron Church (Intermont, West Virginia)

The article Hebron Church (Intermont, West Virginia) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Hebron Church (Intermont, West Virginia) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tomandjerry211 (alt) -- Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 12:01, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Joshua Soule Zimmerman

Hello, WV! I've just finished reading and copy-editing Joshua Soule Zimmerman. It's another fine article. There were hardly any problems. I just have two minor concerns:

1) Do you remember regarding another article how I thought putting date ranges in parentheses in the lead slows down the flow of the sentences? I'm wondering whether the actual dates need to be given in the lead. Perhaps something like "in the early years of the 20th century" for both of them would be sufficient. If you really want the dates to be there, perhaps removing the parentheses and fitting the dates into regular prose would work.

  • Thank you for the suggestion! I've added "in the early years of the 20th century" to the first paragraph of the lede to remedy this. -- West Virginian (talk) 12:40, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

2) I was surprised to read the first mention of his father, but not his mother. His mother is mentioned later, but not in the same way. I'm too tired right now to find them; I'm sure you will be able to find them.

  • This was a bit odd because the sources state that Zimmerman was born at the ancestral home of his mother, but they do not give the name of this home. So because his mother is introduced in that context, she is named first. Then his father is introduced with his vocation as a Methodist minister. His father is mentioned in the lede because his ministry brings Zimmerman to the Eastern Panhandle of West Virginia where he forges his political career. Let me know if this makes sense. I tried introducing both parents together, but because the "mother's ancestral home" detail, it's difficult to work in unless you have any suggestions. Thanks for the catch! -- West Virginian (talk) 12:40, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

I was skimming the article on George Washington University (because of the link at "Columbian University" (which I had never heard of)). I finally found the information saying that "Columbian College" was changed to "Columbian University" (at least for some parts of the college if not all – I don't remember), then later to "George Washington University". I was looking at the images, and I was puzzled by two of the captions. I don't know if you know anything about GWU, but if you do, perhaps you can explain these to me:

(a) RomePathWalk? No spaces between the words? Very odd. Or very modern, perhaps.

(b) Corcoran Salon Doré. 01 - Do you really think the "01" is needed? Corinne (talk) 01:17, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

  • Corinne, George Washington University has been known by several names, and has been located at several locations throughout D.C. during its existence. I live a few neighborhoods over from GWU, so I'll have to stop by and inspect these places for myself. Rome Hall is a building, and it doesn't seem as if this walkway is named, so I changed the caption to "Walkway at Rome Hall." It looks like the person used the name of the image file to create the caption, hence the lack of spacing. GWU recently acquired Corcoran College of Art and Design, and the Salon Doré is the Corcoran Gallery's 18th-century French period room. I've changed this in the caption. -- West Virginian (talk) 12:40, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
The captions look much better. What a nice acquisition for GWU! Corinne (talk) 17:11, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
Corinne, It most certainly is! It was controversial in D.C. given the historic significance of the Corcoran College of Art and Design and the Corcoran Gallery. The college and gallery were in need of funding, and when their funding situation became unsustainable, the actual school component was acquired by GWU and the Corcoran Gallery and its collection were acquired by the National Gallery of Art, although the gallery maintains a special relationship with GWU. I'm glad they are both saved! -- West Virginian (talk) 17:28, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
I am, too. Thanks for explaining. I had confused the Corcoran College with the gallery, but it's still a nice acquisition. The gallery is exquisite and I'm sure will benefit from the connection to GW. Corinne (talk) 18:08, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Samuel Lightfoot Flournoy

Hello, WV! I've just finished reading and copy-editing Samuel Lightfoot Flournoy. It's even better than the Zimmerman article! I have just two or three minor concerns:

  • Corinne, I will be getting to these comments in a moment, but just for the record, this was a copyedit and review of Samuel Lightfoot Flournoy (West Virginia lawyer) and not of his father Samuel Lightfoot Flournoy. (Myself and other editors have been unable to come to a consensus regarding disambiguations for their names since they did not use Jr. and Sr.). It looks like during your review, you conflated the two men. The article for his father Samuel Lightfoot Flournoy was already copyedited, but of course an article can never be copyedited too many times! I will incorporate these changes into the articles for the two men later today. Thank you again for the double copyedit/review! -- West Virginian (talk) 12:52, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
Oh. I think I put the GOCE template on the talk page of the father's article after I had left these comments here. Other than that, I don't think I mixed things up, did I? I just moved the GOCE template to the talk page of the article on the son. Corinne (talk) 17:06, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

1) At the end of the second paragraph in the lead, you have this sentence:

  • In addition to serving as an incorporator of the New Homes Corporation of Charleston in 1931, Flournoy was later president of the Mortgage Exchange Corporation and was involved in the establishment of a local association of mortgage businesspeople in 1952.

It's all right, but only "all right". Usually, when we use "in addition to X," you've already said he did X. Here, you're introducing new information. Grammatically, the sentence is correct, but I don't like introducing new information with "in addition to X", especially in the lead. Also, when you follow it with "and later he did Y", the "in addition" is unnecessary. I prefer direct past tense verbs:

  • Flournoy served as an incorporator of the New Homes Corporation of Charleston in 1931 and was later president of the Mortgage Exchange Corporation. He was involved in the establishment of a local association of mortgage businesspeople in 1952. / He was involved in the establishment of a local mortgage business association in 1952. [Is there a difference between an association of mortgage businesspeople and a mortgage business association?]
  • I've incorporated the above suggested sentences and it would not be incorrect to say mortgage business association, especially in the lede, so I've incorporated this as well. Thanks for the suggestions! -- West Virginian (talk) 08:05, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

2) At the beginning of the second paragraph of the lead, you have this sentence:

  • Flournoy relocated to Charleston in 1890 during his father's second West Virginia Senate term.

I know you go into slightly more detail later, adding that he relocated with his family, but since he was only four years old at the time of this relocation, do you think it sounds a little odd to say he "relocated to Charleston"? Perhaps "moved to Charleston"? Or "relocated with his family to Charleston"?

  • I've incorporated "relocated with his family to Charleston" per your suggestion. -- West Virginian (talk) 08:05, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

3) In the "Law career" section of the section Samuel Lightfoot Flournoy#Career, you have this sentence:

  • Throughout his law career, Flournoy was designated as a special master, arbitrator, or commissioner for several high-profile lawsuits and court cases.

I know you go into detail regarding these positions soon after this, but when I first read this, I thought you were perhaps offering synonyms for "special master". The conjunction "or" makes one wonder, well, which one was it?

I'm wondering what you think of re-wording it so that it is clear he held all three of these different positions at various times. Something like this:

  • At various times during his law career, Flournoy was appointed special master, arbitrator or commissioner for several high-profile lawsuits and court cases.

I know it still says "or", but maybe it's the different introductory phrase ("At various times during his law career") that indicates he held the different positions at different times. What do you think? By the way, is there a significant difference between "lawsuits" and "court cases"? Wouldn't just one of those suffice? Perhaps "...or commissioner in several high-profile court cases".

  • Thank you for this suggestion as well! I've incorporated this in both the lede and in the "Careers" section.

(One more item to follow.) Corinne (talk) 02:51, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

4) The second paragraph in Samuel Lightfoot Flournoy#Political career is:

  • During a controversial re-indexing of Kanawha County records by Works Progress Administration officials in 1935 and 1936, Flournoy served as chairman of the Charleston Bar Association's Re-Indexing Committee, which completed an independent investigation of the re-indexing progress, as ordered by the bar association's executive leadership. Under Flournoy's leadership, the committee completed its review in January 1936.

I've highlighted the word "leadership" in bold to show you how close they are, and they're referring to the leadership of different people. I'm wondering what you think of using a different term for the first use, perhaps "board", "council" or "committee". Corinne (talk) 03:01, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

  • I've changed the first usage of "leadership" to "committee." Thank you for the catch! -- West Virginian (talk) 08:05, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

P.S. As I was searching for the right place at the top of the article's talk page to add the GOCE template, I saw that the article was copy-edited on July 23, 2015. Did I already copy-edit the article on that date? I thought the name sounded familiar. Of course I don't mind at all doing another copy-edit. In fact, if I did copy-edit the article once, it seems different now, and I'm glad to have reviewed it a second time. Just wondering. Corinne (talk) 03:06, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

  • Corinne, thank you so much for reviewing and copyediting another of my articles! I've incorporated all your suggestions into this article and I feel it flows much better now. Thanks again! -- West Virginian (talk) 08:05, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Robert White (West Virginia senator)

The article Robert White (West Virginia senator) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Robert White (West Virginia senator) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tomandjerry211 (alt) -- Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 14:41, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Literary Hall

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Literary Hall you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tomandjerry211 (alt) -- Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 15:20, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Literary Hall

The article Literary Hall you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Literary Hall for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tomandjerry211 (alt) -- Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 18:41, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Romney Academy

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Romney Academy you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tomandjerry211 (alt) -- Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 21:40, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Edwin Maxwell (attorney general)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Edwin Maxwell (attorney general) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tomandjerry211 (alt) -- Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 22:01, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

List of accolades received by Dookudu

This, is my first film awards list at the FLC. If interested, please leave your comments here. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 12:52, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

This list has been promoted to FL status yesterday and is my first FL success. Thanks for reviewing/commenting/supporting the list's promotion at its FLC. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 01:39, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Dwarka

Can you kindly consider reviewing this GAN? Thanks.--Nvvchar. 04:10, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

  • Nvvchar, I would be honored to take on this review, and I hope you won't mind that it will take me a few more days to do so. Let me know if you have any questions or concerns in the meantime! -- West Virginian (talk) 08:20, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
^ Thanks you, take your time. No hurry.--Nvvchar. 01:28, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Romney Academy

The article Romney Academy you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Romney Academy for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tomandjerry211 (alt) -- Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 11:01, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Thayer Melvin

I've just finished reading and copyediting the article on Thayer Melvin. It's quite well written and needed hardly any changes. I hope you don't mind that I removed the word "twice" before "reelected" in the lead. I didn't think it was needed because you've got "re-" in "reelected" and you give the two dates. I thought with "twice" there, it almost sounded like he was elected 2 x 2 = 4 times, which puzzled me because there were only two years, but I guess you used "reelected" because he had held the position before that, so each subsequent election was a reelection. Feel free to put "twice" back in if you want to. I left "twice" in, though, when you mention this again later in the article.

It's Wednesday, in the morning, and I think I was quite tired when I wrote these comments last night, so they seem a little silly now that I'm re-reading them. Sorry about that. Here is the link to my edit. You can see this sentence in the second paragraph: [1] I might have been a little confused about what the original position was to which he was reelected twice (he held so many positions!). Now I see it is the circuit judge position. So, shall we put "twice" back in? I guess it's all right. I'll do that. Corinne (talk) 15:10, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

In the fourth paragraph in the lead you have this sentence:

  • Melvin was twice reelected to his circuit judge position, and resigned in 1881 to practice law in Wheeling.

(This is a different sentence, I think, from the one I was referring to above. I assume "twice reelected" means he held the position three times: election/appointment + 1st reelection + 2nd reelection.)

I've copied this sentence here for another reason. I know you explain this in more detail later in the article, but I'm wondering if you could give some slight indication of the time frame for the second half of the sentence relative to the first half. It sounds like he might have resigned right after he was elected. Perhaps just changing the order in the second part would help:

  • Melvin was twice reelected to his circuit judge position, and in 1881 he resigned to practice law in Wheeling.

I think that's the way it needs to be worded. Corinne (talk) 03:33, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

I thought of a different way to word it:
  • Melvin was twice reelected to his circuit judge position, resigning in 1881 to practice law in Wheeling.
What do you think of this wording? Corinne (talk) 01:11, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Here is the sentence in the lead from which I removed "twice":

  • By the age of 20 he was elected as the Hancock County Commonwealth's attorney, a post to which he was reelected in 1856 and 1860.

I don't think "twice" is needed, at least here. If you do want "twice" in the sentence, it really should be punctuated differently:

  • By the age of 20 he was elected as the Hancock County Commonwealth's attorney, a post to which he was twice reelected – in 1856 and 1860. (By giving two years, that's the same as saying "twice".) Corinne (talk) 03:49, 9 September 2015 (UTC) Forget this. I put "twice" back in. Corinne (talk) 15:13, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Corinne, as always, I look forward to, love, and appreciate your reviews and copyedits! It looks like you have put twice back in, so is there anything else for this article that I must address? Thanks again for your thoughtful comments and suggestions! -- West Virginian (talk) 00:10, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
I have a question about this sentence, the first sentence in the fourth paragraph of the lead:
  • In 1865, Melvin was elected prosecuting attorney of Hardy County and was reelected as the prosecuting attorney for Hancock County the following year.
How can you call it being reelected if it was for a different county? Corinne (talk) 01:21, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
Thayer had previously been twice elected the prosecuting attorney for Hancock County, prior to being elected as the prosecutor of Hardy County. Since it's not a "continuous" reelection so to speak, I will be go ahead and change it to "elected." -- West Virginian (talk) 12:20, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
WV, I recently installed Windows 10. After that, WikEd didn't work, so I asked at the technical page. I found out there were others for whom WikEd suddenly stopped working (there was a thread going) for those using Google Chrome. An editor suggested I switch to Firefox, which I did, and WikEd started working. But, since then (I don't know if it started when I installed Windows 10 or when I switched to Firefox a day or two later) it seems that the ping from my page doesn't work. I left a query about it, but havent' received a reply. I wonder if you would mind if I test it out just to see if the problem has resolved itself. I'm going to ping you now. Let me know if you receive it. Thanks. Corinne (talk) 01:30, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
I did indeed receive your ping and responded on your talk page. -- West Virginian (talk) 12:20, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
I have another question. This sentence is in the section Thayer Melvin#American Civil War, and the same or similar sentence is in the lead:
  • By August 1861, Melvin organized a company for state service with its headquarters in his hometown of Fairview.
Normally, in a sentence about the past, after a prepositional phrase beginning with "by" + date, the verb should be in past perfect tense: "had organized". In other words, he had organized a company in or before August 1861. I'm wondering why you used "By August 1861" instead of "in August 1861". Is it because it is not clear exactly when he organized the company, and you know it wasn't later than August 1861? Or is it because you know he started organizing it months before that and finished by August? The only thing that makes me hesitate changing "organized" to "had organized" is that there is nothing else about this particular event either before or after this sentence, so it's kind of isolated, and "had organized" in such an isolated sentence at the end of a paragraph kind of leaves the reader hanging. So the question is, do you want to be grammatically correct or leave it as it is? Another possibility is to join the two paragraphs so the later information (about 1862, etc.) immediately follows this sentence, reducing its isolation. Corinne (talk) 01:52, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
Corinne, thanks for the additional comments. I've changed by to in. I've also merged the two paragraphs per your suggestion. -- West Virginian (talk) 12:20, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Bollywood

Hi WV! Do you have interest in reviewing Bollywood GA nominations 'cause I have a nom currently. -- Frankie talk 14:09, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

  • FrB.TG, I will be engaging in reviews tomorrow when I have a little time off, so I will take a look in the Good Article nominations and will select a few to begin reviewing. Thank you for the heads up! -- West Virginian (talk) 00:20, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Romney Literary Society

You've done an excellent job documenting this obscure West Virginia group; not many would have considered it possible, or even worthwhile, to write a GA let alone a FA. I haven't found anything in the prose that really needs polishing, just some technical and formatting suggestions:

  • In the infobox, the society's foundation and dissolution date should use {{Start date}} and {{End date}} for metadata purposes.
  • Also would it possible to paraphrase the society's purpose in the infobox rather than to repeat it verbatim here and in the prose.
  • The size of an image shouldn't be specified in the infobox or with the other images, as it overrides a reader's thumbnail size preference. As the photo of Literary Hall is in a portrait orientation, appending |upright will keep it from being larger in relation to the others.

If I spot anything else, I'll let you know. Niagara ​​Don't give up the ship 22:34, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

  • Niagara, thank you for your review and suggestions! I will be catching up on my Wikipedia responsibilities tomorrow, so I will hopefully address and incorporate your comments and suggestions then! Thanks again! -- West Virginian (talk) 00:21, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Niagara, I've incorporated all your suggested changes. Take a look and let me know if you have further suggestions! -- West Virginian (talk) 15:27, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
  • I have added {{Refbegin}} and {{Refend}} to the "Bibliography":section; in some browsers this is more noticeable than others, but keeps the citations and bibliography looking the same. I have also fixed a deprecated parameter in a citation template and hidden another in the infobox (which you can decide what should ultimately be done with it). The presence of both caused the the article to be placed in maintenance tracking categories noting that were problems that needed to be addressed. I also notice you link a lot of your sources to Google Books, which there is nothing against, but I generally avoid, particularly if there isn't a preview (nothing needs to be done if you find it useful, though). Other than those, I have not found anything else. Niagara ​​Don't give up the ship 01:33, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Niagara, thank you for your edits and for rescuing this article from a maintenance tracking category! -- West Virginian (talk) 08:18, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Literary Hall

I've just finished reading and copy-editing Literary Hall. I hope you don't mind that I re-worded some sentences and rearranged some sentences within paragraphs. If you don't want me to do that so much, let me know.

I changed a sentence in Literary Hall#Hampshire County Public Library to "expanded its hours to include". After I saved it, I saw that the next sentence had that same verb. Here are the two sentences now:

  • Following its move to Literary Hall, the library expanded its hours to include both Wednesday and Saturday afternoons. Its book exchange hours were expanded to five afternoons a week through the assistance of the National Youth Administration and the Works Progress Administration.
  • I've changed the first usage of expanded to increased per your suggestion. -- West Virginian (talk) 12:23, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
  • I think "expanded" goes better in the first spot and "increased" goes better with the passive voice verb in the second spot. Corinne (talk) 15:04, 11 September 2015 (UTC) I hope you don't mind that I went ahead and reversed the verbs. I thought of another verb you could use instead of "increased": "extended" - "its hours were extended", but then you have two verbs beginning with "ex-", and there's another word in the same sentence beginning with "ex-". It's up to you. Corinne (talk) 15:09, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

I don't think it's too bad, but if you want to change one of the verbs, you could either change the second one to "were increased" or we could change the first one back to the way you had it.

2) I just had a concern that you might have included too much information about the Clinton Masonic Lodge. I think it gets away from Literary Hall a bit. I'm not an expert in article construction, so you might have to consult someone else. Corinne (talk) 03:07, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

  • Corinne, I tried to include an appropriate amount of context as I had done with the Romney Literary Society. I'll see if I can pare this down some. Thank you for the suggestion. -- West Virginian (talk) 12:23, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 09 September 2015

Your GA nomination of Edwin Maxwell (attorney general)

The article Edwin Maxwell (attorney general) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Edwin Maxwell (attorney general) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tomandjerry211 (alt) -- Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 20:21, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Thayer Melvin

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Thayer Melvin you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 22:01, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Romney Classical Institute

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Romney Classical Institute you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tomandjerry211 (alt) -- Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 00:01, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Romney Classical Institute

The article Romney Classical Institute you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Romney Classical Institute for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tomandjerry211 (alt) -- Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 16:21, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Romney Academy

Hello, West Virginian! - I've just finished going through Romney Academy. You'll see I made a few minor copy-edits. I have a few concerns:

1) In the second paragraph in the section Romney Academy#Establishment and development, you have this quote:

  • "the average price of tuition, exclusive of books, paper, etc. has been within a small fraction of four cents for every day of each attendance for each poor child."

Normally, a comma is used after "etc.", but since this is inside a quote, I hesitated to add it in case the original text did not have a comma there. Can you look at the original text? If there is no comma in the original, I wouldn't add one here.

  • The original text did not use the comma, and rendered it here the same way as not to distort the original quote. Thanks for the catch! -- West Virginian (talk) 21:08, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

2) In the first paragraph in the section Romney Academy#Board of trustees, you have this sentence:

  • Due to subsequent vacancies incurred among the board of trustees since Romney Academy's establishment in 1818, its act of incorporation was amended by the Virginia General Assembly on March 25, 1839, appointing a new board of trustees governing Romney Academy consisting of prominent Romney area residents David Gibson, John Baker White, Angus William McDonald, Daniel Mytinger, and John Kern, Jr.

I wonder whether the sentence isn't a little long. Besides that, you have three present participles, "appointing", "governing", and "consisting" in close proximity. I assume that the "appointing" was done by the act of incorporation, but it may also have been done by the Virginia General Assembly, so not quite clear. The new board of trustees clearly consisted of prominent Romney area residents, but was the act of incorporation so specific? It didn't cover broader issues?

Whether or not you break the sentence into two, can you give some thought to the verbs in this sentence to make it clear who or what did the appointing and whether or not the act of incorporation specified these particular board members. Perhaps just changing "consisting of" to "that consisted of" would help. If you like the idea of breaking this sentence into two, perhaps end the first one after "Romney Academy" and start the new sentence, "The new board consisted of...". I don't know. What are your thoughts?

  • I've broken this sentence up into two. Take a look and let me know if you think this works better. -- West Virginian (talk) 21:08, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
The new second sentence is fine. I'm still troubled by the first sentence, though, even with the change of "appointing" to "which appointed". The sentence starts, "Subsequent vacancies were incurred among the board of trustees..." and because it is followed simply by "and", it's not clear whether that was the reason for the 1839 act of the General Assembly. I'm wondering whether the sentence should start something like this, "Because there were several vacancies among the board of trustees, in 1839 the General Assembly passed..., appointing a new board of trustees consisting of Mr. A, B, C and D", or "Due to several unfilled vacancies on the board of the trustees,..." I know that puts back "appointing" and (possibly) puts the two sentences back into one, but maybe that wasn't the problem. Corinne (talk) 23:11, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Corinne, I've reworded the sentence per your guidance. Thank you for the suggestion! -- West Virginian (talk) 02:36, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

3) I was totally confused by the various buildings. You mention the buildings here and there, scattered through all the sections, and you don't use the same word/phrase to describe the various buildings each time. I just couldn't keep the various buildings separate in my mind. It would take some time for me to find all the mentions and lay it out clearly. Can you give some thought to this? Do the buildings have to be mentioned in several different sections?

  • The buildings here play a very prominent role. There is the initial building during the colonial era, then the main building used by the academy, which was the stone building that warranted its own section below. And then, there is the new 1846 building, which once it was completed, the academy relocated there and became the Romney Classical Institute. I'll take a look later to see if I can find a way to make these timeline seem less confusing for the reader. Thank you for the suggestion -- West Virginian (talk) 21:08, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

4) The last sentence in the section Romney Academy#Establishment and development is:

  • Following the school's move to the building, it was reorganized as the Romney Classical Institute with Foote as its principal.

When I read this, I wondered, "Who was Foote?" I looked back and saw that the only mention of him before this is way back in the lead. You give a more complete description of him and a link in the next section. I wonder if you need to mention Foote here at all. Also, this is about the 1840s, and the next section starts again with the 1820s. I know these are separate sections, but I wonder if there is a way to minimize the jumping around in time in this article. Just a thought.

  • Usually I try and keep my articles in chronological order, but in this one, I tried to pull out themes and discuss them individually like "Faculty and curriculum" and "Board of trustees" and of course the old stone building got a section. When I have time, I'll probably make that a buildings section to discuss all the buildings used by the academy during its existence. -- West Virginian (talk) 21:08, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

5) At the beginning of the third paragraph in Romney Academy#Establishment and development you have this sentence:

  • Romney Academy was formally established on February 11, 1818, when the Virginia General Assembly finally passed an act entitled "an act incorporating the trustees of Romney academy, in the county of Hampshire" in which the assembly incorporated Romney Academy and constituted and appointed a board of trustees for the operation of the institution.

In this sentence there is a quote. In the quote, "academy", in "Romney academy", is not capitalized. I know it is a quote and the text should reflect the original. Are you sure "academy" is not capitalized in the original?

  • Academy was not capitalized in the original quote. I tried to be faithful to it, so I left it uncapitalized here too. Corinne, thank you so much for another thoughtful and very helpful copyedit and review! As you can see my to do list for copyedits is dwindling, so I'll need to start working on more new material! Some of my articles and lists in work have been taking a little longer than expected but I hope to have two new articles for GOCE by the end of the month. Thanks again! -- West Virginian (talk) 21:08, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Well, that's all. Corinne (talk) 17:42, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Dwarka has been nominated for Did You Know

TFL notification

Hi, West Virginian. I'm just posting to let you know that List of tallest buildings in Brooklyn – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for October 12. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 20:20, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Giants2008, thank you for selecting this list to be featured as a TFL. I reviewed the lead tailored for the TFL feature, and feel that it works perfectly. I look forward to its October 12 appearance! Thanks again and let me know if you have any questions or concerns in the meantime! -- West Virginian (talk) 07:27, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of William C. Clayton

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article William C. Clayton you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tomandjerry211 (alt) -- Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 23:01, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

West Virginia

Hello, West Virginian! I've just started to read the article on West Virginia, and I have a question for you. I looked at the infobox briefly and was startled by the "Route marker". Don't you think the image of the route marker ("20" in a black outline) is a little large? Is it that important that it has to be so big? Corinne (talk) 01:59, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Corinne, I believe that is the default size for the state highway marker section of the "Infobox U.S. state symbols" template. I would suggest leaving a note at Template talk:Infobox U.S. state symbols; perhaps they can reach some consensus there and shrink the size a bit. -- West Virginian (talk) 07:31, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Romney Classical Institute

I've just finished working on Romney Classical Institute. What do you think? Corinne (talk) 02:48, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

  • Corinne, I just reviewed your copyedits to Romney Classical Institute. Thank you so much for engaging in yet another superb copyedit and review of one of my articles! Its prose flows much better now! -- West Virginian (talk) 08:26, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
You're welcome! Are you sure you don't mind my re-wording things here and there? If you'd prefer that I left your wording but just made minor edits, I don't mind. Corinne (talk) 12:27, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
You're always welcome to Wikipedia:Be bold with my articles! That is why I nominate them for GOCE... I like a different perspective! -- West Virginian (talk) 14:05, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
O.K. Thanks. Corinne (talk) 16:00, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of William C. Clayton

The article William C. Clayton you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:William C. Clayton for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tomandjerry211 (alt) -- Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 19:41, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Today's featured article/October 2, 2015

A summary of a Featured Article you nominated at WP:FAC will appear on the Main Page soon. It mostly follows the lead section; how does it look? - Dank (push to talk) 17:17, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Dank, I just reviewed the summary of the TFA summary paragraph for Capon Chapel, and I am incredibly honored that it has been selected. It reads perfectly and I look forward to its appearance on the front page. Thank you for taking the time to format this writeup! -- West Virginian (talk) 17:31, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
Thanks. Happy to help! - Dank (push to talk) 17:43, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Thayer Melvin

The article Thayer Melvin you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Thayer Melvin for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:01, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Capon Chapel

Congrats on yet another Featured Article and Today's Featured Article. :) Keep up the great work! :) - Neutralhomer • Talk • 09:19, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Neutralhomer, thank you for your kind words and for your support! Once Romney Literary Society is through FAC, I hope to nominate Hebron Church next! -- West Virginian (talk) 14:55, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 September 2015

Req to review!

Hey there! I am on a wiki-break now. Can you review Lady Gaga videography which is at FLC here? It's okay to ignore this. -- Frankie talk 18:33, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

  • FrB.TG, I've completed my review and left my comments on the candidate page. It looks like all the concerns have been raised and addressed! Congratulations on yet another job well done! -- West Virginian (talk) 13:33, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXIV, September 2015

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 05:08, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Special Barnstar
A special barnstar to a special editor of Wikipedia. Congratulations on completing a decade here. Kudos to you! — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 13:27, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Ssven2, thank you tremendously for this honor! I'm greatly humbled, and appreciative. It's hard to believe that it's been ten years since I created this account, as Caponer. I am looking forward to the next ten... perhaps in that time I can finally finish my to-do list ;) Thanks again! -- West Virginian (talk) 13:30, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
No probs. Its editors like you that make WP, and in turn, the world itself by reading WP articles expanded by us editors, a better place! — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 13:32, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
Ssven2, keep up the amazing work, and continue to let me know when you have lists and articles for review, as I'm always interested to review your latest work! Thanks again! -- West Virginian (talk) 13:35, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
Sure thing. :-) — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 13:35, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Just came to know that you have completed ten years in Wikipedia. Congratulations! Pavanjandhyala (talk) 13:59, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

  • Pavanjandhyala, thank you for the congratulations! It's been a pleasure working with you and I look forward to many further projects to come! -- West Virginian (talk) 14:35, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
All the best! Pavanjandhyala (talk) 16:15, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Alexander W. Monroe

Hello, WV! - I've just finished reading and copy-editing Alexander W. Monroe. I just have two concerns:

1) At the beginning of the lead, you start off as you often do, giving all the dates. I didn't remove them because you seem to like to have the dates there. I don't know what is normally done in other similar articles; maybe dates are given, I don't know. You know what I've said in the past regarding the lead in other articles (that the dates break up the flow of sentences and slow the reader down), but it's really up to you as to what you prefer.

  • I know it breaks up the sentence flow a bit, but I sometimes like to include the parenthesized dates to provide temporal context to the reader of when this person was active in the roles mentioned.

2) Toward the end of the article, you list the names of Alexander and his second wife Margaret's children. Right before the list, you say they "had children, four of whom survived to adulthood" (or something like that). Don't you think there should be a number before "children"? I noticed that no dates were given for the last child in the list. Did that child not survive to adulthood, and, if so, do you know if she was the only child that did not survive to adulthood? If so, we know they had five four children. If you don't know the number, perhaps you could write that they had "at least five four children" or "several children". What do you think of my other edits? Corinne (talk) 22:47, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

  • Corinne, thank you for the catch! I've changed this to: "Monroe and Margaret had at least four children:" Annie Monroe survived to adulthood but I was unable to find any records of her birth or death. Thank you so much for engaging in another thorough and thoughtful copyedit! -- West Virginian (talk) 12:46, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Mingo Oak

Hello, West Virginian! I have just pretty much finished going through Mingo Oak. I have a few concerns:

1) The first sentence of the last paragraph of the section Mingo Oak#Dimensions and age is the following:

  • Various estimates place the tree's seeding sometime between 1354 and 1361 AD although estimates of the year of its origin vary within a few decades.

There appears to be some repetition here. Are the "estimates of the year of its origin" from the second half of the sentence the same as, or different from, the "various estimates" from the first half of the sentence? If they are different from the first estimates, then I would add "other" before the second "estimates". But even if you do that, it's not clear why the second clause is subordinated to the first clause (with "although") nor why the second group of estimates (in the second half of the sentence) needs to be mentioned separately at all since you've already said, "Various estimates". What is significant about the second group of estimates that it needs to be mentioned separately?

If, however, the second "estimates" is really part of the first group of "various estimates", then it's not clear why you need to mention that the estimates vary within a few decades, since you just said the estimates are between 1354 and 1361.

  • I've removed the second part of the sentence. Is was in fact referring to the same estimates. -- West Virginian (talk) 13:20, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

2) Later in that paragraph you have this sentence:

  • In September 1932, West Virginia state forester D. B. Griffin and Emmett Keadle, president of the Mingo County Fish and Game Protective Association in Williamson, used an increment borer of its own and estimated the tree to have begun its growth around 1356, with an accuracy of measurement within 25 or 30 years.

In the phrase, "used an increment borer of its own", it's not clear to what "its own" refers.

There may be a more standard and more common phrase to use than "with an accuracy of measurement within..." but I can't think of it right now. Something like "standard deviation" or "plus or minus...". I'll have to do a little research to find it.

  • "Its own" referred to the Mingo County Fish and Game Protective Association, but it looks like this problematic phrase has been removed, which works well. I'll keep the wording as is, since "standard deviation" refers to a calculation of deviation for a group. If the the protective association had calculated all the estimates, the outcome of that calculation would be a standard deviation. I wonder if a better phrase here would be "Margin of error." This article from the U.S. Forest Service discusses margin of error in dendrochronology. I think this may be the term we were both grasping for. I've modified the text accordingly.

3) The last sentence of that paragraph is:

  • Blueprints and boring samples were consigned to the West Virginia State Museum in Charleston and to the Smithsonian Institution in Washington, D.C.

I don't know, but the word "consigned" has a slightly negative connotation to me, like "consigned to the dust-bin". Maybe it also has a normal, non-negative connotation, too. What do you think of changing "consigned" to another word such as "sent", "given", or "distributed"?

  • I've replaced consigned with given. Thanks for the suggestion!

4) In the third paragraph of the section Mingo Oak#Felling, you have this sentence:

  • Criss was a public relations for the Kelly Ax and Tool Works Company. Meek arrived with his own crew from the E. C. Atkins and Company, a saw manufacturer.

I think you'll see that a word is missing after "Chriss was a public relations". I don't know what word should go there, so I didn't add one. Something like "executive", "man", "manager"?

  • I had originally written "public relations spokesperson" but spokesperson was accidentally removed by me at some point. I've put it back in. Thanks for the catch!

5) In the second paragraph of the section Mingo Oak#Legacy, you have this sentence:

  • Under the terms of the Island Creek Coal Company's lease with the West Virginia Game, Fish, and Forestry Commission, the land around the former tree reverted to the company following the tree's death and felling.

I changed "its death and felling" to "the tree's death and felling" because "its" was slightly ambiguous. There are several singular nouns before it, and I think the noun ("the tree's") makes it clear. Then I also changed "its felling" to "the tree's felling" at the end of the lead, but the sentence is a little different there, and I wondered whether you thought it was clear enough that "its" referred to the tree and nothing else in this sentence in the lead. If you do, you can change "the tree's" back to "its" (in the lead); I wouldn't change it back in the later sentence, though.

  • Thank you for this fix! This works just fine!

6) In the second paragraph in the lead, and later in the article, you have this sentence:

  • While the tree had long been known for its size, it was not recognized until 1931, when John Keadle and Leonard Bradshaw measured the tree and found it to be the largest living white oak in the world.

In the clause, "it was not recognized until 1931", it's not clear what "it" refers to. Does it refer to the tree, or its size? I would clarify this by using a noun instead of "it". The subject of that clause will determine which meaning of "recognize" is meant – "recognized" meaning "realized for the first time", or "recognized" meaning "honored publicly"? I think you mean the former, so it's important to know what was realized for the first time. (Don't forget to make the change in both places where the sentence appears.)

  • I've remedied this in both sections of the article by including the proper noun and "publicly." Thank you for the suggestions!
WV, at the risk of irritating you, I still don't completely understand this sentence:
  • While it had long been known for its size, the Mingo Oak was not publicly recognized until 1931, when John Keadle and Leonard Bradshaw measured the tree and found it to be the largest living white oak in the world.
I see you added "publicly" to "recognized". I really hadn't meant to suggest that you add "publicly". I had thought that clearing up the ambiguity of "it" would clarify the meaning of "recognize". I only used "publicly" above to summarize those different meanings of "recognize". Now I see which meaning you think is the right one, but right after this sentence (which merely speaks about measuring), there is no mention of any announcement or newspaper article or ceremony. I'm wondering if a slight change in wording would make sense:
  • While the tree had long been known about for its size, the unique status of the Mingo Oak was not recognized until 1931, when John Keadle and Leonard Bradshaw of Williamson took measurements of the tree, and found it to be the largest living white oak in the world.
This avoids the word "publicly", and I believe shifts the meaning of "recognized" back to "realized for the first time". What do you think? Corinne (talk) 00:37, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
Corinne, you're a genius and wordsmith as always! You can never irritate me; I am always open to improvement! -- West Virginian (talk) 02:09, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

7) I don't know whether "Parent-Teacher Association" should have a hyphen or an en-dash. We've got to check MOS. (I'm too tired to do that now.) Well, that's all for now. Corinne (talk) 02:01, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

  • The article for Parent-Teacher Association uses the standard hyphen, and the sources also used the standard hyphen. I have some proposed articles that will be affiliated with West Virginia's Parent-Teacher Association, so I will delve into this more in the future, which may result in a modification of the article title. Thank you again for another comprehensive and thorough copyedit and review Corinne! -- West Virginian (talk) 13:20, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Moodu Pani

The next article I worked on for GA. User:Kailash29792 is the main contributor while I'm a co-contributor. Do let me and Kailash know if you would like to conduct a GA review on it. Thanks. — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 02:07, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Ssven2, I will claim this review, but due to my schedule and obligations this week, I won't be able to complete the review until this weekend. Hopefully that will be alright! -- West Virginian (talk) 13:32, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
That's alright. Do notfiy the nominator, Kailash29792 about it as well. — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 13:34, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Just a gentle reminder on the article's GA review.  — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 13:00, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

...and one from me. Kailash29792 (talk) 08:08, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
Ssven2 and Kailash29792, I swear I haven't forgotten you both and this article! I will be completing my review tomorrow morning EST. I apologize for the prolonged delay. -- West Virginian (talk) 01:02, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
No worries. Do let me and Kailash29792 know when you have left comments at the GAR page. Thanks.  — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 01:04, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Rod Steiger/archive1

Dr. Blofeld's next FAC of which I'm a co-nominator. Feel free to leave comments at the FAC page. — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 05:49, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Ssven2, I will review this article for FAC by the end of the week. Thank you again for the notification! -- West Virginian (talk) 13:34, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
You're welcome. — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 13:36, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Mingo Oak

Yunshui 雲水 14:52, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Joseph Sprigg (attorney general)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Joseph Sprigg (attorney general) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tomandjerry211 (alt) -- Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 17:21, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 September 2015

DYK for Joseph Sprigg (attorney general)

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 01:53, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Joseph Sprigg (attorney general)

The article Joseph Sprigg (attorney general) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Joseph Sprigg (attorney general) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tomandjerry211 (alt) -- Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 11:21, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The GA star
Congratulations on completing 50 GAs! An amazing feat!  — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 13:39, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Ssven2, thank you so tremendously for this special honor. Your thoughtfulness and camaraderie on Wikipedia is valued and always appreciated. Thanks again! -- West Virginian (talk) 13:57, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
You're welcome, West Virginian.  — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 13:58, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
Congratulations West Virginian. 50 GAs is not a mean feat and i appreciate your hardwork. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 00:48, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
Pavanjandhyala, thank you so incredibly much for the kind words and encouragement! -- West Virginian (talk) 13:22, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
Congratulations, West Virginian! Corinne (talk) 18:43, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
Aww thank you Corinne! --West Virginian (talk) 22:11, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Kudos!

Nice work on today's FA. APK whisper in my ear 01:29, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

Congrats on your first TFA. Well done, Sir. :) - Neutralhomer • Talk • 01:52, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
Thank you AgnosticPreachersKid and Neutralhomer for the kind words and congratulations! I appreciate all your continued support, and extraordinary contributions to Wikipedia! -- West Virginian (talk) 03:43, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

Congratulations on your 2nd FA and your first TFA.  — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 04:37, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

Join the choir of praise, precious again, - great article beginning with attractive at-a-glance information! - I am singing here, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:25, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
For bringing the article of Romney Literary Society, an important historical place in West Virginia, to FA status. Congratulations. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 04:06, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
  • Pavanjandhyala, అవార్డు ధన్యవాదాలు // thank you tremendously for this award, and thank you for all your significant contributions to Wikipedia! -- West Virginian (talk) 04:24, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
If speaking Telugu itself is a stunner, you wrote the text too. How did you manage? Pavanjandhyala (talk) 04:26, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
Pavanjandhyala, a good friend of mine is Tamil and has taught me some phrases and characters from both the Tamil and Telugu languages. I only know the very basics, as I had to look up "అవార్డు" ;) All the best! -- West Virginian (talk) 04:30, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
Great. Anyways, all the best for your future endeavours. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 04:31, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

Well done! Sorry I didn't find time to take a look at it, was that the one you asked me to copyedit? It's just I'm preoccupied with Sinatra at the moment!♦ Dr. Blofeld 06:17, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Thanks Dr. Blofeld! No worries. -- West Virginian (talk) 21:57, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mingo Oak

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mingo Oak you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:00, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 September 2015

Congrats and QPQ

Hi there, congrats on your new FA! Sorry I didn't get a chance to respond to your response. I was just wondering if you could look at Boys Don't Cry (film) for featured article status. It's my first FAC, and I would really appreciate it. Even a check on one of the aspects of the criteria would be very helpful. Thanks, Johanna (formerly BenLinus1214)talk to me!see my work 03:03, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Johanna, thank you for notifying me of your FAC! I promise to review this article within the next 48 hours. Thank you again for the review! -- West Virginian (talk) 08:20, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
Thank you! :) Johanna (formerly BenLinus1214)talk to me!see my work 01:53, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
Johanna, I promise to get to it soon; it's a busy week! -- West Virginian (talk) 02:16, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:West_Virginian/Archive_23&oldid=1190229668"