User talk:Westsomething

Welcome[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, Westsomething, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Aaroncrick^{(Tassie Boy talk)} 20:55, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Miostatin2.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Miostatin2.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:50, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Miostatin1.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Miostatin1.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:50, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nikolai Klyuev[edit]

The source doesn't seem to be reliable: the author (Arthur Klesh) is not a known expert, and the article contains some rumors and speculations (for instance, the one that the relationship between Klyuev and Yesenin was of sexual nature - there's no definite evidence of it). --89.31.118.162 (talk) 10:52, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It's the material from media, the journal. And it's not stating about the relationships between this two persons, it's the description which explains such believes of Klyuev in Christ. Wikipedia is made to be encyclopedic, it's need to provide the explaining why exactly Klyuev have such believe. I don't care about the sexual orientation, Pyotr_Ilyich_Tchaikovsky was gay, Leonardo Da Vinci too and noone cares about it, this is only the label. Westsomething (talk) 05:51, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Originally, this claim comes from A. M. Etkind, who is an expert in psychology and psychoanalysis, not history or literature. I'm not sure whether we can consider him relevant. --89.31.118.162 (talk) 05:59, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What claim? Who you are? This is out of discussion. This is encyclopedia - it must respresent all sources about material. It's not your personal sandbox. Why do i need to wasting my time on this... Westsomething (talk) 02:12, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]