User talk:Whyagainwiki

Welcome[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, Whyagainwiki, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! - Ahunt (talk) 21:15, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Agora Tablet PC at Comparison of tablet pcs[edit]

You did a really good job adding the new tablet to the table and I just have few questions for you:

why did you remove the reference to the manufacturer's page?
how do you know that it's multitouch?
where did you find that it has bluetooth?
where did you find seven hours of batter life? The reference you added just says "Battery life is more adequate than good lasting a full day but no more" and manufacturer states only 3 hours of general use.
how do you know that it has lithium polymer battery?
where did you find that it has 3g? This article states otherwise.

Hakimio (talk) 10:53, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Update: researched the tablet and updated the specs for you. Hakimio (talk) 17:06, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the delay. I did update it from UK website of Agora.

Multiple accounts[edit]

As a rule, you are not allowed to operate more than one account, per the multiple accounts policy. I have therefore blocked User:Whyagainwikiimages. I'm going to assume that you were simply unaware of the policy, and no real harm was done - I'm therefore not blocking this account for sockpuppetry, as would usually be the case. Yunshui 雲‍水 11:45, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and in case you haven't checked WP:REFUND recently, I've restored the Nokia 2710 article to your userspace for you to work on - it's at User:Whyagainwiki/Nokia 2710. Ignore the message at undeletion review about contacting Fastily - he's retired from Wikipedia - but do please get the opinion of myself or another admin/experienced editor before moving the page back to article space. Yunshui 雲‍水 11:47, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Yunshui

Please approve User:Whyagainwiki/Nokia 2710 I will move it later once approved. Thanks

Sorry, but the tone is still too promotional (it's little more than a prose list of features), and it doesn't meet the notability requirements due to a lack of appropriate sources. You need to provide references to significant coverage in multiple, reliable, independent sources before the article can go into mainspace. Nokia's own websites don't make the cut as sources, since they clearly aren't independent of the subject. Yunshui 雲‍水 08:55, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OK I cleaned it up more based on nokia 2700 wiki page

Hope this is OK

Still not quite there, I'm afraid. The GSMArena source is no more than a spec listing, not the significant coverage required. You could, however, make use of the information at their review of the phone, which arguably does contain enough coverage. You would then need at least one more source unconnected with Nokia to pass the inclusion requirements; if you can find another review in a suitably mainstream publiaction, that would do the job. Incidentally, turning the prose list into a bulleted list doesn't actually address the content problem... Yunshui 雲‍水 11:53, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]