User talk:WhydoesyourfacexD

Welcome![edit]

Hello, WhydoesyourfacexD, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Satan's Intoxicated Dead Goat Cheese, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Tea House, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! GSK ✉ ✓ 02:54, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Satan's Intoxicated Dead Goat Cheese[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Satan's Intoxicated Dead Goat Cheese, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. GSK ✉ ✓ 02:54, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013[edit]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Wheat Thins, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Ben Ben (talk) 02:59, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 03:09, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WhydoesyourfacexD (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I realize that I vandalized everything and I'm very sorry. I would like to be a legitimate contributor to the encyclopedia, and I have already begun on the Simple English wikipedia under my other alias Thesixthstaff. If you would be so kind as to unblock me, that would be cool, thanks.

Decline reason:

You've made one edit there so far, so we don't have a lot of evidence to go on. If, in a few months, you've established yourself as productive on another wiki such as Simple English Wikipedia, we might consider an unblock, but as of now, too soon to do that. only (talk) 21:47, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Man I really regret this[edit]

However, I am returning in six months to appeal my block. As I said in my previous appeal, I have been contributing to the Simple English Wikipedia under Thesixthstaff, as seen here. I hope you'll let me back. :( WhydoesyourfacexD (talk) 02:03, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WhydoesyourfacexD (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

However, I am returning in six months to appeal my block. As I said in my previous appeal, I have been contributing to the Simple English Wikipedia under Thesixthstaff, as seen here. I hope you'll let me back. :( WhydoesyourfacexD (talk) 02:03, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline. If you complete the requests below, please repost an unblock request and it will be evaluated. Mike V • Talk 06:43, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I'm leaning towards accepting the request per the standard offer and your contributions on simple wikipedia. However, just to confirm a few things could you sign into your account here to confirm that you are the individual making the request? Also, could you make an edit on simple wikipedia to confirm that Thesixthstaff is your account? Thanks, Mike V • Talk 22:09, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Simple English Wikipedia link. PhilKnight (talk) 06:32, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WhydoesyourfacexD (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

So it's been about nine months since I was blocked, which I think is enough of a gap to request the standard offer. As you can see above, I contributed to the Simple English Wikipedia fairly regularly for a while under the alias thesixthstaff. I will make an edit on my talk page on the Simple English Wikipedia, as well as here, as was requested by Mike V in July. I have been inactive on the Simple Wikipedia as of late because I've been busy, et cetera, but I genuinely wish to contribute to the encyclopedia. That being said, I don't wish to use this account to edit - I'd like to continue with thesixthstaff as I have made only helpful contributions there, and the sole purpose of this account was vandalism. How would I go about disabling this account and permanently switching to the other? Thank you for reviewing my request, and giving me a second chance. WhydoesyourfacexD (talk) 22:27, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As you requested, I have unblocked your other account, Thesixthstaff, and this one can remain blocked. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 15:40, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.