User talk:Wiikkiiwriter

Your recent edits[edit]

Please use your usual account for messages like the ones you've been posting lately, see WP:SOCK#SCRUTNIY. Thanks! Kylu (talk) 02:43, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It is quite obvious from your editing pattern that you are not brand new to Wikipedia. If you wish to use multiple accounts, it is generally good form to link the accounts to each other so others don't get confused, and think you are trying to hide your identity. Since I know you are not intentionally hiding your identity, could you let everyone know what your older account is? Thanks! --Jayron32.talk.contribs 02:45, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You say you lost the password to your other account. What was the account? If we know that account, then we know that you aren't trying to hide anything. I know you are a good user, and have no desire to hide any prior accounts, so I am certain you would have no problem revealing your prior identities... --Jayron32.talk.contribs 02:54, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You may be interested in this: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Historian19. Cheers! --Jayron32.talk.contribs 03:12, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

January 2009[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for This is obvious an alternate account used only for trolling and disruption. We can do without that thank you.. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Spartaz ^Humbug! 06:44, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Autoblock should be lifted. seicer | talk | contribs 13:50, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Request handled by: seicer | talk | contribs 13:50, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It appears the blocking admin has released your block; I just disabled a related autoblock on those grounds. Try editing? – Luna Santin (talk) 12:28, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I did try but it appears that I am still blocked — Wiikkiiwriter (talk) 12:39, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Argh. One more autoblock. Try again? – Luna Santin (talk) 12:40, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Still blocked — Wiikkiiwriter (talk) 12:42, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, now I see it -- the autoblocks are being reset because the original block was not, in fact, unset (my mistake reading the log). That being the case, I've taken a closer look at the circumstances surrounding this block. I can confirm that there's no obvious technical link between this account and Historian19 (talk · contribs), but your immediately leaping into that area does seem unusual. Would you be willing to explain how you became involved in that dispute? – Luna Santin (talk) 12:57, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Participate on this discussion is not a violation to Wikipedia is it? Nor did I vandalize and nor did got any warning before a block was in. Me writing on the board was only for a personal reason , a reason for me to help fellow users in a situation they may feel stuck in, like for example three users against one and doing everything on their powers to just kick him out, like me, I was accused for something I did not do. participate on this dispute was not the reason I was blocked, was it? — Wiikkiiwriter (talk) 13:04, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Check auto block please? :) — Wiikkiiwriter (talk) 16:00, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Understand that by undoing my edit, no administrator will be lead to this page, so they won't be able to judge whether the unblocked template by Seicer was in error, or Seicer just forgot to follow up on it (because as it is, you're still blocked, not autoblocked). See here. Suit yourself though.--Atlan (talk) 16:04, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest you post another unblock request, pointing to the above "request granted".--Atlan (talk) 16:11, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

hmmm.... I think that should take care of it. Let me know if you have any more issues. seicer | talk | contribs 16:47, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation[edit]

You are directly copying from this [1] article into Wikipedia, thereby violating Wikipedia's copyright policy. Please stop. Acroterion _(talk) 01:39, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've re-opened a discussion on AN/I at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#copyright_violations. Acroterion _(talk) 02:08, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, Thanks Wiikkiiwriter (talk) 02:20, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, such as User:Hhhhhahaha, you will be blocked from editing. --( fi ) 04:03, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP:DNFTT[edit]

In regards to your recent edit to WP:ANI, please see the above essay. Thanks. Kylu (talk) 04:09, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

February 2009[edit]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did to Breast, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Toddst1 (talk) 01:32, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Breast[edit]

I think not. You can do search engine searches just as well as I can. AnyPerson (talk) 01:34, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The generalizations about women are merely personal observations, so cannot be allowed as-is. A valid source would be required. Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} 02:03, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Breast revert[edit]

Why I reverted your edit should be fairly clear, you cited no sources, and the information you had added seems like more akin to a rumor then a real fact backed up by evidence. --Honeymane_{Heghlu meH QaQ jajvam} 03:34, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

At best. Racist rhetoric at worst. Toddst1 (talk) 06:14, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vandal at large, again[edit]

Hi there WIIKKII, VASCO here,

I noticed you scolded vandal PASD08 in this article, Hassan Nader, as seen here (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hassan_Nader&diff=265319412&oldid=264916352). Well, just look a little bit further above: this idiot vandal has opened a FIFTH account, SVZ08, and continues to remove links, refs, gluing sentences, just because.

This might also be helpful (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Pararubbas/Archive)

Keep up the good work, VASCO from PORTUGAL,

--NothingButAGoodNothing (talk) 22:37, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009[edit]

Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia and the articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits, as you did to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard. Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, try the sandbox, where you can write (almost) whatever you want. ╟─Treasury Tag►contribs─╢ 08:50, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi[edit]

The total number of Kurds in the world is around 30 million, but Iraqi Kurds specifically exist in multiple places like Iraq obviously and are around 6 million, and Kuwait (immigrants from Iraq) 200000, and there probably exists in other countries but i am not sure of their numbers,they are probably a minority.If you want information about Kurds in general, then there are also millions in Turkey (home to the largest Kurdish population in the world), Iran, Syria, Lebanon, Israel, Azerbaijan, Afghanistan, Canada, USA, Russia, Ukraine, Greece, Denmark, Austria, Switzerland, Sweden, UK, France, Germany, Armenia and more countries.Hattar393 (talk) 06:19, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There are Iraqi Kurds in many countries, but to publish a number is very difficult..i only know that there are iraqi kurds in Iraq and Kuwait because their population in those two countries are public. Other countries do not have statistics pertaining Iraqi kurds, they would only have Iraqis or Kurds, not Iraqi Kurds. Sorry for making this long, but i hope you got what i am trying to say. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hattar393 (talk • contribs) 00:52, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]