User talk:WikiEditsAnnon2

January 2018[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Busted discography, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. — LeoFrank ^Talk 10:51, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I gave adequate explanation in that I bought the albums. And don't have a hissy fit over me changing one number to make it closer to the actual value of sales for the album. You are ruining Wikepidia.

Deletion discussion about In Bloom (Neck Deep Song)[edit]

Hello, WikiEditsAnnon2,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether In Bloom (Neck Deep Song) should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/In Bloom (Neck Deep Song) .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Winged Blades^Godric 13:34, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Information[edit]

Regarding this: Neither of these edits were vandalism. Neither claimed you were an admin. Please see WP:NOTVANDAL to learn the definition of vandalism. Additionally, the fact that you own the album is practically irrelevant as regards reliably sourcing content. Please see Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources to help you understand how to source content. Tiderolls 22:17, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018[edit]

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Busted discography.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Theroadislong (talk) 22:22, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Twenty One Pilots[edit]

You may not have noticed when you made this that the genre list was preceded by a hidden edit notice that read.... You did not add the source of the added content to the infobox, much less the relevant section. When you see these edit notices it's always best to explore with other editors how best to proceed. In many cases the edit notices are placed after a consensus has been reached. Please see WP:Verifiability; sources are required whenever one adds content that may be contested. Since your edit has already been reverted it was obviously contested. Tiderolls 18:45, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In Bloom response[edit]

I'm thinking about doing more work on it this weekend. My edit did not save the article from deletion, as it is still considered for deletion. I'm not sure when it will be deleted but in order the keep it from being deleted we'll have to add a background, music video, composition, reception, and charts section, all supported by sources very soon. I'll try to do that but it won't be easy. I'll start looking for sources tonight and see what I can do and hopefully keep it from being deleted. Bowling is life (talk) 23:18, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Where did you get the chord progression for the song? It needs a source and I can't find a source for it. Bowling is life (talk) 00:08, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have made some improvements to the article but I can't find any charts. Without charts, I don't think we can save this article from being deleted. Bowling is life (talk) 01:47, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Spotify charts[edit]

It looks like Spotify is a single source chart and should not be mentioned in the table. If you disagree, please point to a reliable source that shows the non-Spotify data that Spotify aggregates for their ranking. —C.Fred (talk) 00:17, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018[edit]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

- TNT^❤ 21:51, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]