User talk:WikiExplorerAbhi

Welcome![edit]

Hi WikiExplorerAbhi! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 15:10, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Timtrent unable to get approval for mt edit plz help me out WikiExplorerAbhi (talk) 16:14, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I did already. I reviewed a draft of yours. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 16:25, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Timtrent is that get aprooval WikiExplorerAbhi (talk) 16:27, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No. You have to do the work. Please read Help:YFA 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 16:30, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Timtrent i ll try my level best

if i given the content can u do this for me once so that i can learn things by seeing WikiExplorerAbhi (talk) 16:37, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

just now I edited one page and submitted it plz check tht once i think it will meet alll criteria WikiExplorerAbhi (talk) 16:50, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot do this for you. I saw what you submitted. Please do not simply resubmit with, it has huge problems you need to solve. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 17:17, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Timtrent i removed extra citations kept inly relevant informations and citation accordingly WikiExplorerAbhi (talk) 17:22, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

there is no problem with the content and styles now ONLY thing is with the citation WikiExplorerAbhi (talk) 17:23, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am not going to review it a third time. The second review was a major exception. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 17:27, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Timtrent ok if possible kindly go through it.

and i wanted to clear is second time no problem with the content ryt only citation errors WikiExplorerAbhi (talk) 17:33, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot be unbiased about it. I am too close to it. I'm sorry. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 18:42, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Puttur, Karnataka, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Jalen Folf (talk) 17:49, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@JalenFolf sure am not aware about that will revert it WikiExplorerAbhi (talk) 17:52, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

new page creation[edit]

dear i like to create one user page for the physics savage WikiExplorerAbhi (talk) 17:56, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Catholic Board of Education, Managlore (November 23)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Pbritti were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Lacks independent sourcing, does not appear to pass GNG.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Catholic Board of Education, Managlore and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Pbritti (talk) 16:33, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, WikiExplorerAbhi! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Pbritti (talk) 16:33, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Catholic Board of Education, Managlore (November 23)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pbritti was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Additional citations are either not reliable or independent, constituting a REFBOMB.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Catholic Board of Education, Managlore and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Pbritti (talk) 16:50, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Pbritti ok i ll try next time with latest content WikiExplorerAbhi (talk) 16:56, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: AP Monteiro (November 23)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs to

meet any of the eight academic-specific criteria
or cite multiple reliable, secondary sources independent of the subject, which cover the subject in some depth

Make sure your draft meets one of the criteria above before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If the subject does not meet any of the criteria, it is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:AP Monteiro and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

asilvering (talk) 17:28, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Asilvering he is a academician and young scientists as awaredee fron government of Karnataka WikiExplorerAbhi (talk) 17:52, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @WikiExplorerAbhi, usually "young scientists" are too early career to have wikipedia pages, so I don't think an award for young scientists is a very solid basis for the notability of an academic. And with a PhD in 2011, he's not a "young scientist" anymore, so there should be something more you can find. You say he's an academician - what academy? That might help. The article also mentions he has written several books - do these have scholarly reviews? Are they extensively cited? That's the sort of thing you need to show. Have another look at the academic-specific criteria at WP:NPROF. -- asilvering (talk) 00:28, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Asilvering Dear i have resubmitted the article for your kind perusal

as per your suggestion i have added books authored by the Dr AP Monteiro and it is selling in Amazon abd other platforms also

and several citation for the claim I added at the same time to prove he is a academician i added the institution name where he is working and also google school id

thank you 103.150.152.96 (talk) 02:09, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: AP Monteiro (November 23)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vanderwaalforces was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:AP Monteiro and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 18:04, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Vanderwaalforces help me to post publish this page WikiExplorerAbhi (talk) 18:13, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: AP Monteiro (November 24)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by BuySomeApples were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:AP Monteiro and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

BuySomeApples (talk) 04:31, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Antony Prakash Monteiro has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Antony Prakash Monteiro. Thanks! Greenman (talk) 11:20, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Antony Prakash Monteiro (November 24)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Vanderwaalforces were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs to

meet any of the eight academic-specific criteria
or cite multiple reliable, secondary sources independent of the subject, which cover the subject in some depth

Make sure your draft meets one of the criteria above before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If the subject does not meet any of the criteria, it is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please, don't do WP:CITEBOMBing, pick the citations and place them just after statements that they support. Not putting them all at the end like this. Also, sources are mostly primary meaning they are either the subject's own work, or they are works connected to the subject in one way or the other. See WP:SECONDARY for more information.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Antony Prakash Monteiro and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 11:26, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Antony Prakash Monteiro (November 24)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please sort out the WP:BOMBARD

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Antony Prakash Monteiro and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 15:07, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Antony Prakash Monteiro (November 24)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Timtrent were:

I do not normally review more than once. I a making an exception.

"Department of Physics[5].[6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][1][14][15][4][16][17][18][19][3][20][21][22]"is a prime example of WP:CITEKILL. Instead we need one excellent reference per fact asserted. If you are sure it is beneficial, two, and at an absolute maximum, three. A fact you assert, once verified in a reliable source, is verified. More is gilding the lily. Please choose the very best in each case of multiple referencing for a single point and either drop or repurpose the remainder.

Please deal with "nternational publications.[15][16][18][19][13][14][24][17][20]" and with '"Mangalore Diocese[26][27][28][29][24][30]" as well, and do not introduce any more.

No-one can review this until they know which references you have chosen. Do not resubmit before you have solved this.

Don't know what to do? For;low the long to the AFC Helpdesk, and ask there.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Antony Prakash Monteiro and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 16:55, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Black Kite (talk) 18:44, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Black Kite how come uploading 2 pics will lead to promotion WikiExplorerAbhi (talk) 01:31, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]