User talk:Wikiboykid

Hi Wikiboykid, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of Contents

Department directory

Need help?

Questions — a guide on where to ask questions.
Cheatsheet — quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes.

Wikipedia's 5 pillars — an overview of Wikipedia's foundations
The Simplified Ruleset — a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules.

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia — a guide on how you can help.

Community Portal — Wikipedia's hub of activity.

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.

If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.
If you'd like to tell us about yourself and meet other new users, be sure to introduce yourself at our new user log.

Good luck, and have fun. --Matt/TheFearow (Talk) (Contribs) (Bot) 06:03, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Verdict suspect[edit]

I am not a vandal as claimed with my sock Wikikidboy. And I have not emailed anybody saying I am.--Wikiboykid 06:44, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wikiboykid (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Where is the evidence? Show any contribution that is indentified as vandalism. Take my other account Wikikidboy and lets see there too. Yamla is a liar, I haven´t emailed him saying I am a vandal. I am requesting evidence or else this should get a quick ending.

Decline reason:

You have been abusing multiple accounts. You said so yourself, and you did so in a way which contravenes policy — Alison ☺ 09:48, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I'm sorry, but I certainly trust Yamla and don't believe he would act in such a deliberately malicious manner. As you are banned from editing, you are, simply, not permitted to edit, in any manner, whether that would normally be considered vandalism or not. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 08:03, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wikiboykid (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The above statement is false, I haven´t said anything myself. When did I say that? Where is the text showing that I have said that. Do you people even know anything about the articles I contribute too? If not it´s highly likely that you are all jumping to conclussion.--Wikiboykid 14:17, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You're an obvious sockpuppet. -- tariqabjotu 14:20, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

How can I be an "obvious" sockpuppet when I haven´t made any single contribution that can possible be indentified as vandalism? Give me proof beacuse then it´s just a conclussion by you people.--Wikiboykid 15:27, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Any edits made in defiance of a ban may be reverted to enforce the ban, regardless of the merits of the edits themselves. As the banned user is not authorized to make those edits, there is no need to discuss them prior to reversion. Users are generally expected to refrain from reinstating any edits made by banned users. Users that nonetheless reinstate such edits take responsibility for their content by so doing. - WP:BAN.

In other words since you're banned, none of your edits should be accepted, whether it's vandalism or not. By the way, nice username. I see you still like impersonating other editors. -- Oakster Talk 16:12, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What makes you think I am impersonating? Where is your proof that I am a banned user. My contributions are very helpfull and if I was a banned vandal I would vandalise the articles but you don´t see me doing that do you? Nobody has any solid proof of anything and you are all just pathetic. If any of you want me to stop trolling as you say show the proof you have or else I will have to be unblocked now do I.--Wikiboykid 17:26, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wikiboykid (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

There is no proof. If I was to be a vandal I would have vandalised an article by any of my contributions, but that hasnt been the case with my contributions so...--Wikiboykid 00:20, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This is becoming tiresome. Talk page protected. — Naconkantari 00:25, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.