User talk:Wikirob78

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Wikirob78, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Wikirob78, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Night By Night, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! FoxyOrange (talk) 18:51, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Night By Night[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Night By Night requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. FoxyOrange (talk) 18:51, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

April 2013[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Night By Night, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 00:57, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your article is now at User:Wikirob78/Night By Night, where you can edit to your heart's delight. Keep in mind, though, that it will need significant improvement if you wish for it to remain in main space after you move it there. (See WP:MOVE for that.) Have you read Wikipedia:Your first article yet? Good luck, Drmies (talk) 19:04, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 20:33, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikirob78, you are invited to the Teahouse[edit]

Hi Wikirob78! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Nathan2055 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:16, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Night By Night.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 14:31, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Night By Night.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Chihin.chong (tea and biscuits) 16:08, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Message left at the Night by Night page[edit]

I have replied on the AfC page for Night by Night. Chihin.chong (tea and biscuits) 20:07, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Wikirob78[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Wikirob78, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 00:57, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Night By Night, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.
Next step(s): Add an image for the band, Flickr is usually the best place to get an free image as it states the copyright.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia and well done for acting on feedback and improving your article. It has been a pleasure to work with you.

Chihin.chong (tea and biscuits) 19:45, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Night By Night 2013 v2.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Night By Night 2013 v2.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 22:24, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Night By Night 2013.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Night By Night 2013.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 22:25, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Night By Night 2013.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Night By Night 2013.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:30, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback Notice[edit]

Hello, Wikirob78. You have new messages at Chihin.chong's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Nomination of Night By Night for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Night By Night is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Night By Night until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 23:36, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013[edit]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Night By Night. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 14:17, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to get this right, and put citations to Classic Rock Magazine and Bass Guitar Magazine but then they were tagged as unreliable or original research. Seems a bit confusing imoWikirob78 (talk) 14:42, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You added links to things like purerawk, nxnofficial, blogspot.co.uk, festivalphoto.net, stereoboard.com, youtube, etc. These compose non-reliable sources and/or original research. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 15:46, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, please read the message above again, I was clearly referring to the magazines. ThxWikirob78 (talk) 19:37, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The warning was given to you for this edit [1] where you added a substantial number of non-RS sources which was reverted. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 22:10, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Votestacking[edit]

Please review this section WP:Votestacking as you appear to be engaged in canvassing with edits such as this: [2]. Such behaviour is not acceptable on Wikipedia and can be viewed as disruptive. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 14:22, 15 June 2013 (UTC) Not sure about this - I read the Votestacking article and it says:[reply]

"Posting an appropriate notice on users' talk pages in order to inform editors on all "sides" of a debate (e.g., everyone who participated in a previous deletion debate on a given subject) may be appropriate under certain circumstances on a case-by-case basis."

Now JCC approved this article and appeared ok with it - and you do not appear to be so and I can´t see anyone else who has a view. So, I would say me posting on one person´s talk page would appear appropriate in the context of above! Wikirob78 (talk) 14:37, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comments in your notification to JCC included text such as, "which I believe you were happy with" which is appears as trying to influence a !vote. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 15:47, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Seems you may also want to invite FoxyOrange who seemed to have an opinion on an earlier version of it as well with this edit: [3]. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 16:14, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

P.P.S. And it also seems Drmies may be relevant as well considering the logs here [4]. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 16:16, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi thanks for clarifying, it sounds very complicated. I will not contribute any further. All the best. Wikirob78 (talk) 17:04, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but under the circumstances, I'd rather not vote/give my opinion. Thanks, jcc (tea and biscuits) 17:08, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Really isn't complicated at all - if you decide to invite people to comment you should invite all people who have demonstrated an interest in the article, not just those who you think will share your view. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 17:37, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ConcernedVancouverite, I think that Wikirob must get the message by now- he's learnt his lesson the hard way. I would appreciate if took his actions in good faith- he was trying to defend his article without resorting to sockpuppetry (I saw a AfD the other day where it was a sockfest (unsurprising the page nevertheless got deleted)), and such would stop informing him (sorry for using the word informing, I couldn't find another word for attacking that didn't seem so "bitey"). jcc (tea and biscuits) 15:41, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Wikirob78/Night By Night[edit]

A tag has been placed on User:Wikirob78/Night By Night, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

WP:STALEDRAFT copy of Night By Night

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 17:44, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Night By Night Band Shot.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Night By Night Band Shot.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 01:21, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ben Christo (June 4)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Huon was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Some paragraphs don't cite any references whatsoever, others broken links or unreliable sources, leaving major parts of the draft improperly sourced.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ben Christo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Huon (talk) 16:20, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ben Christo (July 24)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kvng was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No new WP:RELIABLE sources added since previous review.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ben Christo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~Kvng (talk) 20:33, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ben Christo (December 1)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kvng was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

M Magazine appears to be the only applicable WP:RELIABLE source. We need to see significant coverage in multiple reliable sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ben Christo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~Kvng (talk) 15:54, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]