User talk:Wikiweb10011

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 08:00, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm Super48paul. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Ethan Suplee because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Super48paul (talk) 08:12, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ethan Suplee. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Ethan Suplee was changed by Wikiweb10011 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.870932 on 2014-01-09T08:21:09+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:21, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiweb10011, you are invited to the Teahouse[edit]

Hi Wikiweb10011! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Ryan Vesey (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:41, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Article: Madison McKinley[edit]

You have twice removed my tags that the article Madison McKinley needs rewriting due to style and because it appears promotional. You also deleted the information regarding this matter that I put on the article's Talk page, as well as comments from someone else raising serious WP:COI concerns. You referred to my tagging as vandalism in comments, which it is not. Please see WP:Vandalism for more information. Also, please see WP:RS regarding the references needed. The article has multiple clear problems which is why I tagged it. I explained this on the article's Talk page. I will revert the edits so that the tags appear and the Talk information appears. Please leave them there. They let people know to work on it. Please feel free to fix the article or ask someone else to. --Jersey92 (talk) 02:49, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Madison McKinley. Such edits are disruptive and appear to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Jersey92 (talk) 03:04, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You removed the tags again while the article needs a lot of work. Please leave them until the article is fixed. Please see the article's Talk page and above. --Jersey92 (talk) 05:35, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your comments are personal opinions. Please do not use inappropriate tags again. Reverted inappropriate tags by Jersey92 to latest version by Wikiweb10011. Checked: article is adequatel and not a promotional article. Please stop using inappropriate tags for personal opinions. Vandalism is now being reported. --Wikiweb10011 (talk) 05:38, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You keep deleting Tags without addressing the reasons that they are being added. The tags are not vandalism. I have added an RfC. Please do not delete it. --Jersey92 (talk) 06:15, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.

FYI: The introduction does not require references or citations. See Lady Gaga's Wikipedia for example: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lady_gaga - Minor editing has been done. Please do not make any inappropriate tags for personal opinions related to the article again without significant contribution to the article. --Wikiweb10011 (talk) 06:30, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about the article should be made on the article's Talk page. The issues are throughout the article and throughout the references. Let's see what the editors say in response to the RfC. --Jersey92 (talk) 06:23, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Repeated abuse of tags (tagging) without improve the article by user Jersey92 --Wikiweb10011 (talk) 06:39, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted your entry at WP:AN/3RR because you deleted a previous entry and replaced it with your own. the panda ₯’ 10:21, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. the panda ₯’ 11:00, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Adding much-needed tags to an article is NOT vandalism. As you were already advised, the article needed massive clean-up, so the tags were indeed valid - edit-warring to remove necessary maintenance tags is not acceptable behaviour. The short form: that article is crappy and needs fixing. Nothing wrong with telling the world to help fix it, especially when there's already a discussion on HOW to fix it ongoing the panda ₯’ 11:02, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've increased your block to one month from now for creating two sock accounts.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:54, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 15:15, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]