User talk:WillowW/Archives from 2013-14

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Dear WillowW[edit]

Thank you for the good article on parametric oscillators that you wrote. I had few problems understanding some parts of it though and would be very happy if you could answer a few of the questions in Talk:Parametric oscillator. regards --Debenben (talk) 04:21, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you in turn for your kind letter. I'm so glad that you translated the article for the German Wikipedia! It was one of my first articles and not very polished, I'm afraid. The article seems to be in good hands, though, and I may add a little "Senf" someday. I hope that your questions have all been answered by now, but if not, please write again. Willow (talk) 08:02, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Old Proteins page[edit]

Hello WillowW, I wondered whether you still had any plans for this page, or whether you would be satisfied to have it deleted. Nikkimaria (talk) 17:44, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine with me. Thank you for taking care of it and for being so courteous in asking. :) Willow (talk) 08:10, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Love history & culture? Get involved in WikiProject World Digital Library![edit]

World Digital Library Wikipedia Partnership - We need you!
Hi WillowW! I'm the Wikipedian In Residence at the World Digital Library, a project of the Library of Congress and UNESCO. I'm recruiting Wikipedians who are passionate about history & culture to participate in improving Wikipedia using the WDL's vast free online resources. Participants can earn our awesome WDL barnstar and help to disseminate free knowledge from over 100 libraries in 7 different languages. Multilingual editors are welcome! (But being multilingual is not a requirement.) Please sign up to participate here. Thanks for editing Wikipedia and I look forward to working with you! SarahStierch (talk) 21:15, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cotes' spirals[edit]

Hello Willow! I've seen your contributions regardings spirals. I was wondering if you could provide more details on the derivation of the formula

referring to movement in an inverse-cube force expression.--188.26.22.131 (talk) 11:20, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox conic section has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. eh bien mon prince (talk) 08:49, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Books and Bytes: The Wikipedia Library Newsletter[edit]

Books and Bytes

Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2013

by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs)

Greetings Wikipedia Library members! Welcome to the inaugural edition of Books and Bytes, TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of Books and Bytes, please add your name to the subscriber's list. There's lots of news this month for the Wikipedia Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved...

New positions: Sign up to be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Wikipedia Librarian

Wikipedia Loves Libraries: Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted.

New subscription donations: Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis??

New ideas: OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges

News from the library world: Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY

Announcing WikiProject Open: WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions

New ways to get involved: Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration

Read the full newsletter


Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be opt-in only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the Suggestions page. --The Interior 21:08, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Permission to use image?[edit]

Dear WillowW: IM a cognitive neuroscientist writing a textbook for Wiley PRess. I'd like to sue your image of nerve conduction speed inmylenatede and unmylenated nerves that you posted in wikimedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Conduction_velocity_and_myelination.png

so I would like your permission and also like to ask how you would like the attribution to be worded.

George SPilich at gspilich2@washcoll.edu or via wikimedia account. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gspilich2 (talkcontribs) 21:16, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your kind letter, and of course you have my permission to use my image. I hope that it's enlightening and useful to your readers. :) Willow (talk) 07:46, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello good morning, I guess you never look to your French page: https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discussion_utilisateur:WillowW … but you should do it. – Because I am glad (or astonished) that you will be a girl of Worms (“Wormserin”). "Nix fer u'gut, awer mer wern's jo se'e" -> Schöne Grüße aus Worms, --Pratz53 (talk) 09:28, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Library Survey[edit]

As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi t | c 15:28, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please read and comment delete or keep Dao's theorem[edit]

Dear WillowW,

I known You because You are creator of pages Seven circles theorem, so You are knowledgeable classical geometry, please read pages Dao's theorem and comment anything You think. Delete or keep pages Dao's theorem

Thank to You very much.

Best regards Sincerely Eightcirclestheorem (talk) 04:42, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Euclidean algorithm[edit]

I have nominated Euclidean algorithm for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. DrKay (talk) 12:11, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]